That may be true, but is he worse than Khali or Batista?,
Yes, because the other two are actually over as credible main-eventers, and Batista, at least, is a good draw. Khali has good drawing potential. Kane is not over and has never been a draw. Ever.
I think Kane should have gotten a title run with his whole, "May 18th" deal.
It was May 19th. Which is a perfect example of how forgettable Kane has always been.
Kane is one of the few guys that has drawing power
Since when? Where is your proof of Kane's supposed drawing power?
Kane v. Undertaker Inferno Match
Kane v. Shane Ambulance Match
Kane And Taker vs. Edge and Christian on Smackdown for the tag belts
Kane v. The world in a TLC match
Kane v. Taker Wrestlemania 14
and which one of your favorite wrestlers comes even close to these?
Hell, son. I can name 5 Ultimate Warrior matches that are better than any of those matches.
Ultimate Warrior vs. Hulk Hogan at Wrestlemania 6
Ultimate Warrior vs. Randy Savage at Wrestlemania 7
Ultimate Warrior vs. Rick Rude at Summerslam 1989
Ultimate Warrior vs. Sargent Slaughter at Royal Rumble 1991
Ultimate Warrior vs. Rick Rude at Summerslam 1990
When you are getting outclassed by the Ultimate Warrior, then you don't deserve a World title.
At this point SD needs a real champ. Batista's time as champ quickly went from alot of people loving it, to a Cena like reaction from the crowds. Khali has 0 mic skills and from what I can tell 0 wrestling skills.
Batista only drew heel heat against the Undertaker. That was the only time. Otherwise, he came out to good pops. Khali is an intimidating badass, whose job is not to do 5 different variations of a wristlock, but to pound the everliving fuck out of you.
Both of them are more credible, and deserving, than Kane.