I think the first time they attacked the undertaker was to make an impact. Taker happened to be on raw that night and they just decided to take advantage of that fact. I think this time it was far more methodical. They deliberately went out of their way to interefere in THIS match aginst THAT man. And I think it is a way of keeping their options open with regards to nexus, I think WWE is intending to keep nexus going til just after mania and this is a back-door is current storylines with them start going slow.
So I like to think of things in a sherlock holmes approach, them you have eliminated all else, whatever left no matter how improbably is the answer. Unfortunately that is difficult to do in a business where storylines are designed to make the most unexpected events come into fruition. For instance it would be hard to say that HBK wasn't behind it if you think far out enough because he has a motive and plausability (ie possibilty of being the raw GM) and although I think it is very unlikely, it is not impossible to rule out.
In that case let us be rid of all the impossibilities. It isnt darren young, evan bourne, jack swagger, and basically low-carders and mid-carders tied up in feuds are not behind it, it wouldn't make any sense. So lets rule out ziggler,bryan,morrison,ted dibiase,cody,drew mcintyre,goldust,zeke,swagger and those guys. Now lets exclude other mid-carders who would make no sense but arent involved in storylines such as kofi, mvp, christian etc. then we'll rule out other people in the top tier who are feud involved and wouldnt make sense, so now we remove miz, sheamus, alberto del rio, rey and others.
OK now were left with Kane, barrett, otunga, cena, raw GM, Edge, HBK, HHH, Chris Jericho, CM punk, someone from taker's past? and anyone else I can't think of atm, has to be a major heel with control over nexus and this is what I can currently narrow it down to.
1) On the following weeks smackdown, Kane seemed very proud of the fact that taker was buried but he didnt seem to know anything of this plan to bury him, concluded bu the fact he was talking about how he was the only man left standing when taker was buried, and that he scared away nexus after they intervened, I'm eliminating Kane
2) HBK retired from wrestling this year. I personally believe that over his years in the business, HBK matured as man. So I concluded that he's is the type of guy who is now totally honest. I dont think he would ever have worked anyweher than WWE and I dont think he will return to wrestling if he gave his word not to, I dont believe he would do that after his very honest speech, so I'm ruling out him because I trust his word.
3) I'm going eliminate jericho seen as WWE arent sure yet when he'll return so to base a story around him being there at a given time would be irresponsible plus nexus seemed very much physically in control of jericho not the other way round. I'm ruling him out.
And I think thats all the guys I can eliminate for certain....
So Raw GM, you can lump HHH into this category as well as michael cole and other prospective people. The Raw GM would do this surely to show what he could do and the control he had on nexus and the things they can do under his control, a very possible choice. I know you probably think CM punk is a wild card, but he is a top heel and could very well have his motives but he has only just moved to raw so it would be odd bringing him to smackdown by default as a result, plus what power could punk have over nexus, theyre not straight edge?, so I think it is possible to rule him out.
Right it cant be otunga ive just realised because wade was there when the whole thing went down and he wouldnt have done it under the rouse of otunga's orders and if it had been done without his say so, he would have brought it up on raw so it isnt otunga although otherwise plausable. So we are left now with wade barrett, john cena of the mystery Raw GM, just as everybody called initially. And what this means is depending on what they decide to do with nexus it could be any of these three, so you see what I mean about leaving options open? All three make as much sense as each other and it really is anyones call which one it will be, there is no sure way of knowing its ours to wait and see.
Thanks sherlock.....no shit....