Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I don't stop to read anyone's in particular, basically if you've seemingly put some actual thought into your post and not just spouted fan boy rhetoric like 'Punk should have never lost to Taker. Punk is way better' or shit like that, then i'll take the time to read your post. After all, you took the time to type it.
And Armbar, if there was a thread for 'whose posts do you avoid?' it'd be a LOT easier for me, but i would definitely get constant hate messages and red rep (not that i give a shit about rep either way as long as it's justified and not truly stupid) if i posted in it, because the guys i purposely avoid have appeared in just about eveyone's posts in this thread so far......
I look forward to seeing how many people try to coax me into revealing who they are....... I'll go out on a limb and say..... none.
Oh, and thanks to the guys who've said me. A year ago i'd have been lucky to get a mention at all.
Why so Sidious??
Really though, Punk shouldn't have lost to 'Taker. Not because he's better, but because there was no reason whatsoever to have 'Taker bury him.
I hope you're being ironic there X.
JMT, Tdigs, Guy, Armbar, Mitch, Kenny Powers, X, Theo, Scotty, SSC, Cardinal, ITGG, IDR, Fizzy (who is fucking underrated in my opinion) and a few others.
Wasn't it done because of something that happened backstage? I thought I heard that somewhere.Not at all. What did feeding Punk to Undertaker accomplish? Absolutely nothing. It in fact set them back by making Punk look weak, killing the insane heat he had been garnering for months.
Not saying Punk shouldn't lose to someone like Taker, just saying that it was a completely boneheaded move that only had negative impact, and no upside. No one came out looking better, 'Taker didn't need the rub.
Nah I believe plans were already in motion to have Punk drop the title to Taker, but then the incident with him not dressing in formal clothes for overseas publicity tours was like the final nail in the coffin and is why they had the match barely go 10 minutes and had Taker pretty much squash Punk. Because he didn't wear his penny loafers with the cufflinks, the WWE cuts his legs out from under him.
Luckily of course he's so damn good that he built up the SES from nothing and a few shitty jobbers to the biggest heat magnet in the company. You can't keep a good man down.
And now they're getting fed to Big Show.
Well fuck you very much too…I pretty much read anything written by people who have avatars and some sort of custom sig. That way I know they're dedicated to the forum and will have a better chance at making a somewhat intelligent post. I do have favorite, of course, but I'm not going to list them. I don't want to hurt anyone's feelings.
xfearbefore said:Not saying Punk shouldn't lose to someone like Taker, just saying that it was a completely boneheaded move that only had negative impact, and no upside. No one came out looking better, 'Taker didn't need the rub.