burnout4200
Pre-Show Stalwart
Personally I think people tend to be alot more creative and loose when they're with their friends. It's rather obvious that Russo at least suggested hiring Ferrera. Cornette comes off as a hot head that could be rather difficult to work with. I'm not saying that's the case it's just the impression I've gotten from his personality. Russo just happens to have a better resume (on paper) than Cornette and Dixie see's more promise going in his direction, and honestly I can't argue.
Since Jarrett took his leave the direction and focus of the company has changed dramatically. Younger stars have been put towards the forefront and some MEM guys have taken a backseat by working with younger/ lower card talent. It almost seems like every older star is in a program with a younger star but I haven't really checked those stats of course. The IWC's previous main complaint about TNA was the older/former WWE superstars burying the young guys. That problem has been more than solved but everyone is in an uproar because of who made it happen.
While the Vince Russo/Ed Ferrera duo has a bad reputation, their strong point happens to be exactly what the IWC was asking for. Blame yourselves not Dixie Carter. During their WCW stint they literally turned the place upside down. Kidman went after Hogan, Vampiro turned on Sting, and other young guys went after the older guys on the very first show (I got the tape but I haven't watched it in awhile. Forgot the other feuds that started that episode). During their WWE stint they were all about creating new characters. They stuffed a few guys into a stable with Shawn Micheals to gain some notoriety off of him, which one of them did. They threw a few guys into a stable with Ron Simmons and I think one of those guys went on to be a little bit popular too if I remember correctly. Goldust might have been a miss, (or partial hit depending on opinions) but you don't need anywhere near a perfect score for a successful result. Creating stars is their focus, Creating stars is what TNA needs to do, and creating stars is what the IWC demanded.
So far I think I've avoided opinion and leaned more towards fact. It's time to get my opinion in. I prefer TNA to WWE for one reason, things seem to change rapidly and you never know what's going to happen next. That's not always a good thing. When you switch ideas too quickly you leave some stories unexplained and you're gonna use some crappy ideas along with the good ones. I'll deal with a few crappy stories in order to be surprised every once in awhile. There seems to be a major storyline change on every single Impact whether it's good or bad. Regardless I turn on TNA knowing that something is gonna happen, I turn on RAW hoping something finally happens, and I turn on Smackdown hoping CM Punk talks kids out of doing drugs so there's more for me. TNA is still Non Stop Action, it just represents constantly changing storylines instead of the actual wrestling in the ring. The last time RAW left me off excited to see the next show Cody Rhodes no sold it and acted like his dad getting RKO'ed was no big deal.
Now for a few individuals. Booker T's thing is weird, but can you tell how much fun he's having with a little bit of creative control? That makes it awesome for me right there. He just seems like a kid in a candy store wanting to try a little bit of everything.
As for Abyss, what he's doing is alot more entertaining than a played out monster gimmick. We know he has it in him, Foley knows he has it in him, but he's trying hard to suppress it and sometimes he can't help but to indulge himself a little. Of course that's immediately followed by disappointment in himself and pulling his hair out of his own head. That's a cool concept. A monster trying to stop himself from being a monster, but he can't quite do it. I think in the long run we'll find out that the interview chick convinced him that he's a better person than the monster he's potrayed as so he seeked help to get away from his hardcore ways.
Hernandez can put on a better match than any WWE big man yet that dude said he's not ready? He's also decent on the mic and reaches a hispanic demographic that TNA would love to have. At least their top tier Mexican is over 5 feet tall and seems credible in a main event.
Eric Young is a little iffy just because his voice annoys me but I liked the guy since the "Don't Fire Eric!" storyline. Also looking at The World Elite I can't find a better leader except Bashir, but having a Canadian run the faction is alot less controversial than someone from The Middle East. Controversy is good, but considering the events of the last decade that would be just plain disrespectful.
Someone asked for a comedy example so I gotta use my recent favorite. Mick handed Abyss a bag and Abyss said "You got me groceries? I like groceries". That was so simple but I laughed now just thinking about it.
Is Russo as good as Marty makes him out to be? No, but at this stage he is exactly what TNA needs. He's credible and the man does have some good ideas. I don't think the bad ideas out weigh the good ideas. He has a questionable eye for talent, but then again does he? Eric Young is a questionable guy to push but he's pushing nearly a dozen undeveloped stars at once. That's what happened at the beginning of the attitude era too and not all of the guys got over, but the ones that did are currently legends of the business. That's also what he tried to do in WCW and it was slowly working and he was making progress. I got a few new favorites out of it at least. He likes to do fast paced storylines which gives you the edge of your seat, whats gonna happen next, feeling. I personally think Russo is one of the most underrated people in the business but that's only because he's hated as much as he is. If people didn't hate him and just knew he was there, without liking or disliking him, I wouldn't call him underrated. He's not great, he's not horrible, but he is good and he keeps me entertained.
Since Jarrett took his leave the direction and focus of the company has changed dramatically. Younger stars have been put towards the forefront and some MEM guys have taken a backseat by working with younger/ lower card talent. It almost seems like every older star is in a program with a younger star but I haven't really checked those stats of course. The IWC's previous main complaint about TNA was the older/former WWE superstars burying the young guys. That problem has been more than solved but everyone is in an uproar because of who made it happen.
While the Vince Russo/Ed Ferrera duo has a bad reputation, their strong point happens to be exactly what the IWC was asking for. Blame yourselves not Dixie Carter. During their WCW stint they literally turned the place upside down. Kidman went after Hogan, Vampiro turned on Sting, and other young guys went after the older guys on the very first show (I got the tape but I haven't watched it in awhile. Forgot the other feuds that started that episode). During their WWE stint they were all about creating new characters. They stuffed a few guys into a stable with Shawn Micheals to gain some notoriety off of him, which one of them did. They threw a few guys into a stable with Ron Simmons and I think one of those guys went on to be a little bit popular too if I remember correctly. Goldust might have been a miss, (or partial hit depending on opinions) but you don't need anywhere near a perfect score for a successful result. Creating stars is their focus, Creating stars is what TNA needs to do, and creating stars is what the IWC demanded.
So far I think I've avoided opinion and leaned more towards fact. It's time to get my opinion in. I prefer TNA to WWE for one reason, things seem to change rapidly and you never know what's going to happen next. That's not always a good thing. When you switch ideas too quickly you leave some stories unexplained and you're gonna use some crappy ideas along with the good ones. I'll deal with a few crappy stories in order to be surprised every once in awhile. There seems to be a major storyline change on every single Impact whether it's good or bad. Regardless I turn on TNA knowing that something is gonna happen, I turn on RAW hoping something finally happens, and I turn on Smackdown hoping CM Punk talks kids out of doing drugs so there's more for me. TNA is still Non Stop Action, it just represents constantly changing storylines instead of the actual wrestling in the ring. The last time RAW left me off excited to see the next show Cody Rhodes no sold it and acted like his dad getting RKO'ed was no big deal.
Now for a few individuals. Booker T's thing is weird, but can you tell how much fun he's having with a little bit of creative control? That makes it awesome for me right there. He just seems like a kid in a candy store wanting to try a little bit of everything.
As for Abyss, what he's doing is alot more entertaining than a played out monster gimmick. We know he has it in him, Foley knows he has it in him, but he's trying hard to suppress it and sometimes he can't help but to indulge himself a little. Of course that's immediately followed by disappointment in himself and pulling his hair out of his own head. That's a cool concept. A monster trying to stop himself from being a monster, but he can't quite do it. I think in the long run we'll find out that the interview chick convinced him that he's a better person than the monster he's potrayed as so he seeked help to get away from his hardcore ways.
Hernandez can put on a better match than any WWE big man yet that dude said he's not ready? He's also decent on the mic and reaches a hispanic demographic that TNA would love to have. At least their top tier Mexican is over 5 feet tall and seems credible in a main event.
Eric Young is a little iffy just because his voice annoys me but I liked the guy since the "Don't Fire Eric!" storyline. Also looking at The World Elite I can't find a better leader except Bashir, but having a Canadian run the faction is alot less controversial than someone from The Middle East. Controversy is good, but considering the events of the last decade that would be just plain disrespectful.
Someone asked for a comedy example so I gotta use my recent favorite. Mick handed Abyss a bag and Abyss said "You got me groceries? I like groceries". That was so simple but I laughed now just thinking about it.
Is Russo as good as Marty makes him out to be? No, but at this stage he is exactly what TNA needs. He's credible and the man does have some good ideas. I don't think the bad ideas out weigh the good ideas. He has a questionable eye for talent, but then again does he? Eric Young is a questionable guy to push but he's pushing nearly a dozen undeveloped stars at once. That's what happened at the beginning of the attitude era too and not all of the guys got over, but the ones that did are currently legends of the business. That's also what he tried to do in WCW and it was slowly working and he was making progress. I got a few new favorites out of it at least. He likes to do fast paced storylines which gives you the edge of your seat, whats gonna happen next, feeling. I personally think Russo is one of the most underrated people in the business but that's only because he's hated as much as he is. If people didn't hate him and just knew he was there, without liking or disliking him, I wouldn't call him underrated. He's not great, he's not horrible, but he is good and he keeps me entertained.