Thats your view on wrestling it isnt right or wrong people are gonnea agree and disagree with you. Some people like different styles. Just because you can have the crowd cheer dosnt mean your a good worker
Umm, that's PRECISELY what it means. If you can make the crowd care about you, then that proves you know how to work the crowd. If you can work the crowd well, then you are a good wrestler. This isn't difficult to understand.
the ultimate warrior got people to cheer him and his matches went on for a good 2 minutes.
Only the squash matches. See his match vs. Hogan or Savage at Wrestlemania. Warrior had the best match at Wrestlemania 2 years in a row.
Same with Khali he can draw a house, make people cheer at him. Yet he can barely move around the ring. That makes him a good wreslter?I guess you can say Floyd Mayweather, Eric Bischoff, Batista, Stephanie Mcmahon, and David Arquette are good workers. All of them drew money and got people to cheer at them.
Except that Mayweather, Bischoff, Steph, and Arquette DIDN'T draw money for their in-ring work. And I say Batista is a good worker.
The say exact thing could be said for Hogan whats the difference between Shawn and Hogan?
Several millions dollars. Millions of fans. A history. The greatest feud that never occurred.
Is that enough?
You dont think Hogan is over the hill. If there is one thing to be said about Shawn is he turns it up at WM. Hogan hasnt been in the WWE in how many years? Look at how much Shawn has done for the WWE from 1993 up to now. I cant stand the guy and he carried the company and was one reason why it is still running. Flair sings Shawns praises in his book, and dosnt do the same for Hogan.
Hogan was making big money for the WWE before Shawn Michaels graduated high school. Hulk Hogan was making big money for wrestling before Shawn Michaels even entered high school. Hulk Hogan did his time, and did it much better than HBK has ever done his. What has Shawn ever done for the WWE, other than put it in constant jeopardy with his bitching, and refusal to put others over clean for titles? His reign in 1996 is the second poorest drawing reign ever, he still doesn't draw well for someone of his stature (I imagine he probably ranks 5th of 6th behind Cena, HHH, Rey, Batista, and maybe the Undertaker), and him facing Flair benefits NOBODY.
Hulk Hogan, on the other, is a dream match with Flair, even if we've seen it before. Hulk Hogan vs. Ric Flair could do great business, and make people buy a ticket they hadn't planned on buying. It could make fans from the 80s buy a ticket to see a match they always wanted, this time for all the marbles.
Hogan makes infinite times more sense than HBK ever will.
Yea, and hogan's constant bashing of the company, and the fact that he only appears occasionally makes him a much better candidate then shawn michaels
No, his ability to still be able to outdraw Shawn Michaels makes him a better candidate.
At least shawn michaels still performs daily in the WWE.
No he doesn't. He works one show a week, unless there's a PPV. HBK rarely works house shows.
And to respond to your other comments. Brett Hart never said hogan was the best, gauranteed.
Bret Hart said:
I can say that Hulk Hogan was not only a hero to millions of Hulkamaniacs, but to all the wrestlers too...
It brought back what I remember most about Hulk Hogan, even more than his feats as a great wrestler....
Ive always tried to follow his example...
Some things in wrestling have always been real and Hulk Hogan is one of them.
http://www.brethart.com/bio/columns/tribute-hulk-hogan
Bash of the Beach was never proven to be a work, thats why it's such a big controversey.
Except when Hogan and Russo have both come out and said it was a work.
Austin did draw more for the WWE then hogan, as stated plainly by vince mcmahon, and im pretty sure he would know.
No, Austin drew more money in one year than Hogan did...15 years later. Adjust for inflation, add total combined years...Bingo.
Hell, the best year the WWE has ever done was in 2000 when Austin wasn't even around.
Hogan did get stale, thats why they turned him heel in 96.
At which point he completely revolutionized the business...again.
I guess I was missing your point, and you proved it by consistently still singing hogans praises?
The fact Hogan was the biggest face and biggest heel of all time should end any dispute to Hogan being the best.
Hogan was the biggest draw in wrestling history when you combine wwe/wcw.
Precisely? That was the whole point.
He was great, but saying he's the best cause he made the most money is ridiculous.
No, it isn't. Because the whole purpose of being a wrestler is to make money for your company. And a promotion's biggest goal is to make money. So, a performer who does his job the best makes the most money.
Which is why Hogan is the best.
An example, David Beckham is the highest paid soccer player in the world, and he's far from the best anyone who knows soccer knows this.
Last I checked, soccer was real competition and professional wrestling was scripted entertainment. Correct me if I'm wrong.
but he doesn't perform the best in the ring.
How do you figure? What about Hogan's in-ring ability is lacking?