Who needs to be taken down a few notches? | Page 5 | WrestleZone Forums

Who needs to be taken down a few notches?

Him being funny has nothing to do with his quality and activity in non spam sections, which is what you seem to think quantifies a quality poster.

They are independent of one another.
 
Tommy "Two-Times" Mozzarella;3504924 said:
If someone disagrees with you on whatever given topic, it doesn't fucking mean they hate you. I'm looking at you, Dagger.

Yeah it's called discussion. Talking about various topics where one or more opinions are voiced. People are inevitably going to disagree. I happen to enjoy seeing other people's opinions on things. I'm quite aware that disagreeing doesn't mean hatred. To think otherwise is fucking stupid. Mitch and I disagree on which Back To the Future film is the best in the series. That doesn't mean we hate each other. Quite the opposite, I consider him a good friend and that disagreement is something to potentially debate on. You know, real debating, the kind between two mature adults who do not rely on personal attacks or suddenly starting a similar thread in the Bar so they can flame instead of using reasonable arguments in their responses. Looking at you, Mozz. Even in my own debating I try to never hurt my opponent in any way shape or form. My only objective is to prove them wrong. That is what debating and discussing is meant to be about. Not bullshit like calling someone ******ed or a "bad poster".
 
Yeah it's called discussion. Talking about various topics where one or more opinions are voiced. People are inevitably going to disagree. I happen to enjoy seeing other people's opinions on things. I'm quite aware that disagreeing doesn't mean hatred. To think otherwise is fucking stupid. Mitch and I disagree on which Back To the Future film is the best in the series. That doesn't mean we hate each other. Quite the opposite, I consider him a good friend and that disagreement is something to potentially debate on. You know, real debating, the kind between two mature adults who do not rely on personal attacks or suddenly starting a similar thread in the Bar so they can flame instead of using reasonable arguments in their responses. Looking at you, Mozz. Even in my own debating I try to never hurt my opponent in any way shape or form. My only objective is to prove them wrong. That is what debating and discussing is meant to be about. Not bullshit like calling someone ******ed or a "bad poster".
You cannot be serious. Either someone took a steaming shit in your Cheerios this morning or you're still holding a grudge about what Mozz said about your game.
 
Mitch and I disagree on which Back To the Future film is the best in the series.

You mean between 2 and 3, right?

Wait, there's a debate that the original wasn't the best?

My only objective is to prove them wrong.

So essentially you have no desire to learn something through the debate, and only care to prove someone wrong and win? That's not promoting discussion, that's a fight.

...Holy shit, you're a woman
 
Yeah it's called discussion. Talking about various topics where one or more opinions are voiced. People are inevitably going to disagree. I happen to enjoy seeing other people's opinions on things. I'm quite aware that disagreeing doesn't mean hatred. To think otherwise is fucking stupid. Mitch and I disagree on which Back To the Future film is the best in the series. That doesn't mean we hate each other. Quite the opposite, I consider him a good friend and that disagreement is something to potentially debate on. You know, real debating, the kind between two mature adults who do not rely on personal attacks or suddenly starting a similar thread in the Bar so they can flame instead of using reasonable arguments in their responses. Looking at you, Mozz. Even in my own debating I try to never hurt my opponent in any way shape or form. My only objective is to prove them wrong. That is what debating and discussing is meant to be about. Not bullshit like calling someone ******ed or a "bad poster".

You're just mad that I criticized your game in a way you didn't like, and began crying about personal attacks or whatever. I didn't actually start attacking you, as a person, until you went ape shit.
 
I must admit that I do have my reservations about the type of people who watch hours and hours of wrestling, be it live or taped or streaming. The ones who've watched most every WCW PPV. I mean, I'm down for watching old Nitros and shit once in a while for a few laughs, but I just have a hard time taking seriously someone who can devote that much free time into this stuff.

I've played with Photoshop before and I know I'm no wizard at it so take this all with a grain of salt, but outside of a few of you on here most anyone who sets up shop in the Graphics section should just kill themselves. Most sigs are garbage, and even good ones get old after a long while. In fact, at this point in time I'm willing to say that if it's not a Miko! or Doc job, it's probably shit.

If it seems that I was harsh on the Graphics guys, just wait 'till I get to the Book This! crew. Honest question: has anyone ever gone more than a few weeks into their own Book This! show? And I'm not talking something like Crock's Stupidity Ensues or whatever; I'm talking the shit I see when I click "New Posts" and it's like "WWE CARNAGE 2011 REBOOT" or whatever and it's got a post to start like "WWE HAS BEEN SOLD TO *random bullshit person* AND THE ROSTER HAS BEEN MOVED AND SOME SHIT, SO YEAH!". I'd probably have meaner things to go on about it I actually read more into these things. Seriously, does anyone else give a shit about these things?

For all the shit guys like to say about Sly from time to time, I tend to find xfear as the bigger asshole. Whoa, whoa, whoa, lemme back up a second there. On paper xfear is someone I should dig; we like similar things, and hold mostly similar opinions on things like freedoms and politics and whatever. In fact, my only reasoning for mentioning him comes down to two things:

1: Under no circumstances can one have a conversation with him about music. Ever. You're just going to walk away wishing it hadn't happened.

2: Not so much of a reason, but fuck it...I hate Buffy, and for some reason I can't see xfear without thinking of Buffy. This alone will probably net me more red rep than anything else I say here.

Stormtrooper....but he's never going to read this and even if he did he probably wouldn't respond.

The folk who have tried to keep The Cigar Lounge relevant...FTS wept.

Last (for now) but certainly not least: that nine-toed ****e Big Nick Dudley. I want my rematch, *****, and I don't care if we have to build a 2011 Debater's League around the two of us to get it. I WAS EATING TURKEY AND HAVING SEX ON MY PARENT'S LIVING ROOM FLOOR! I WANT A REMATCH!!!!!!!!
 
But being completely stubborn does not mean that you win a debate, either. ;)

Actually to be honest it kind of does. If you want to really look at it. A debate is all mental, you have to know what you are talking about. Then on top of that, you have to have the will to outlast your opponent. Outside of scholastic competition, debates could last for months. The first person to break loses. The question on here really is who has the mental toughness to best him.
 
Continuing on the GD thing, he should really learn to tie a Windsor knot. I'm getting tired of doing that for him.
 
DirtyJosé;3505832 said:
2: Not so much of a reason, but fuck it...I hate Buffy, and for some reason I can't see xfear without thinking of Buffy. This alone will probably net me more red rep than anything else I say here.

Broken heart emote?
 
Yeah it's called discussion. Talking about various topics where one or more opinions are voiced. People are inevitably going to disagree. I happen to enjoy seeing other people's opinions on things. I'm quite aware that disagreeing doesn't mean hatred. To think otherwise is fucking stupid. Mitch and I disagree on which Back To the Future film is the best in the series. That doesn't mean we hate each other. Quite the opposite, I consider him a good friend and that disagreement is something to potentially debate on. You know, real debating, the kind between two mature adults who do not rely on personal attacks or suddenly starting a similar thread in the Bar so they can flame instead of using reasonable arguments in their responses. Looking at you, Mozz. Even in my own debating I try to never hurt my opponent in any way shape or form. My only objective is to prove them wrong. That is what debating and discussing is meant to be about. Not bullshit like calling someone ******ed or a "bad poster".

Or a ******. Ain't that right Fagger?


Obama_Shit-eating_grin30.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lee
DirtyJosé;3505832 said:
Last (for now) but certainly not least: that nine-toed ****e Big Nick Dudley. I want my rematch, *****, and I don't care if we have to build a 2011 Debater's League around the two of us to get it. I WAS EATING TURKEY AND HAVING SEX ON MY PARENT'S LIVING ROOM FLOOR! I WANT A REMATCH!!!!!!!!

I can't believe that crutch is still able to support your weight. Those things are quite durable.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top