Who is the worse wrestler? Snitsky or The Great Khali

Who is worse

  • Snitsky

  • The Great Khali


Results are only viewable after voting.
Snitsky plays a better heel than Khali ever could, and at least he's got some moves.
Khali, to be simple, is a ******. He can only do three in ring moves, the chop, the feistgrip and the slam he does. When he's in a battle royale you know that everyone in there to gang up on him.
 
Khali is just a really, big guy. They need him but seeing as he's big in India, plus I can see his feud with Show actually working to an extent.

Snitsky bores me quite a lot, he did a good job of making Jeff Hardy look rubbish in their MitB qualifying match, which means he's unlikely to be on Raw anytime soon. He should replace Umaga as the big scary monster that people are able to beat to give an impression, Umaga is far more valuable. As long as Snitsky remains on Heat I don't care (not that I appreciate it when he holds the likes of Val Venis back) he hasn't done anything particularly wrong to deserve being released anyway. If WWE ever goes on one of their huge budget cuts again where they release about 9 nobodies in one day, expect to see him go.
 
Both guys are touted as ‘monster’ heels. While Khali clearly and without any effort looks the part, I don’t buy Snitsky as a ‘monster’. Snitsky is listed at 6’8 and 307 lbs. I think WWE are inflating his stats (at least his weight). For example, compare Snitsky and Vladimir Kozlov’s builds (he debuted on Smackdown Friday night). He’s billed at 6’8 and 308 lbs. On paper they’re identical yet Snitsky looks almost puny in comparison. Now if Snitsky had natural charisma or mic skills he could compensate for not having the most imposing look. He doesn’t come across as vicious, relentless, or unstoppable (words used to describe a monster). He just looks perpetually constipated to me. Both are decent *at best* in the ring, but Snitsky’s often out of place or late when it comes to taking his opponents moves. I’ve also noticed that Khali seems to have improved a little in the ring in the last few weeks.
 
The worse 'wrestler' is definantly Khali. Snitsky can actually wrestle a decent match however all his matches are squashes so he can't perform a vast majority of moves. Khali however can only chop or choke his opponents out and even then he looks comical when doing it.
 
I haven't yet commented (to my knowledge lol) in this thread. But this is my take..

First, I don't understand where all this hatred toward Snitsky is coming from. The guy does know how to wrestle, its not like he doesn't know moves. Hes just bad with communication in the ring and as such some of the moves get botched. Furthermore, hes always had the plain unoriginal look that hasn't really ever gotten over.

You have to really take into fact that Snitsky's very debut, was as nothing more than a jobber to Kane.. when "fortune" allowed Snitsky (this unknown jobber) to hit Kane with a chair, and cause Lita to have a miscarriage. From there, noone sold Snitsky as suddenly dominate and dispite practically squashing Kane at Taboo Tuesday, and actually hurting Kane in the end of that match.. noone still sold Snitsky as believeable.

So I ask, is it that noone sold him as a monster from the beginning because he debuted as a jobber? Most likely. Has Snitsky had the ability to since grow, absolutely. Has he, no.

Snitsky's best chance at growing was when he sided with Edge during 2005. Then somehow Edge backed out of a Tag Team match at that year's Taboo Tuesday, which then Snitsky was paired with Chris Masters which completely killed his push since Masters is in no way, shape, or form the Superstar Edge is, or ever will be.

Now, the current gimmick push of Snitsky, this nasty teeth monster heel thing.. where's it meant to head? Hes squashed Hacksaw Jim Duggan & Super Crazy on countless internet HeAT broadcasts, but outside of that, hes normally the one jobbing to Triple H. or Jeff Hardy on Raw.

So, in the end I have to say I fail to understand why Snitsky is being discussed in a thread asking who the worst "wrestler" is, when Snitsky has far more talent than The Great Khali. Its not like Snitsky doesn't sell kicks, and punches. Its not like he only knows how to do kicks & punches, the guy actually wrestles. The bigger story regarding Snitsky in this thread is whether hes believeable as a heel monster, which because of his very debut, no hes not. But as far as him knowing how to wrestle, yes, he does.
 
Good Therad.

These two guys are both played of as monster heels- Khali looks the part and plays it as well as he can and he's really big in India which for the WWE must be a marketing dream.

Snitsky has had varied roles whilst being in the WWE. He has always had shitty gimmicks and none of the fans really give a damn about the guy. Expect him to be released pretty soon.
 
This is an interesting question, I mean you could go either way on it. Snitsky is probably the better in ring performer, neither are any good in the ring, but Snitsky can do a little bit more. The thing is, although Snitsky is a little better in the ring, it doesn't make up for the physical advantage that Khali has. Both play the same "monster" role. Khali is bigger than everybody else in wrestling, Snitsky is not, which is what makes Khali more of a monster, he is better for his gimmic, which is why I would say Snitsky is worse.
 
I think Snitsky is worse they try and try to push this guy and it never goes anywhere. I never believe goingi into a match that Snitsky is going to win. Hell he has lost so much that i dont even think you could consider him enhancement talent.

The Great Kahli while being complete and utter shit actually serves a purpose. He is freakishley huge and when somebody goes over him in a match it gives them a rub. He also made me believe that he could be a credible World Champion. Plus the fact that Kahli is huge in India.

What purpose does Snitsky serve?? To show the kids the benefits of brushing there teeth.
 
There's another crappy wrestler nobody here mentioned...Funaki. Why is he still there & other talented wrestlers get released cause the writers can't think of anything 2 do with them? Kanyon said it best,' Why don't you fire the writers?'
 
In wrestling ability I'm gonna have to say that Khali is worse, he looks like he doesn't know what hes doing in a wrestling ring and all he ever seems to do is those stupid karate chops to the head, also didn't he kill a guy when he was training?
 
Why are some people voting for Khali? Khali has had several surprisingly decent matches, whereas Snitsky has had absolutely none. Khali versus Cena, Undertaker, and I think he was involved in a match where he got into a scrap with Umaga that was pretty awesome. I think he also had some matches with Finlay that were neat too.

Also, Khali is pretty useful to the WWE's expansion into India. I hear he's helped them out significantly over there and is a pretty big star there to boot.

So Snitsky has both A) Never had a good match, and B) Never been shown to have any use to WWE whatsoever.

Now, I'm not saying Khali is good by any means.. but he's capable of having a good match with the right guy. Snitsky, not so much.
 
There's another crappy wrestler nobody here mentioned...Funaki. Why is he still there & other talented wrestlers get released cause the writers can't think of anything 2 do with them? Kanyon said it best,' Why don't you fire the writers?'

i think he's a road agent. that would be a pretty good reason. as far as talented wrestlers, the likes of rob conway are hardly talented, given the HUGE pops he got as a singles wrestler. add to that he works and is happy to job and you've got a talent promoter
 
The fact is that if these guys were working for Paul Heyman's ECW in the 90's they'd both be booked effectively and would look so much better that hardly anyone would draw attention to their shortcomings because Heyman was/is a master at hiding wrestlers' shortcomings and emphasising their strengths to get them over.

Khali is great when he is booked as the tower of fear who nobody can stop but the amount of pinfall/submission losses he has been given over the last year have severely damaged his aora of invincibility,it no longer means half as much when someone picks up a win over him.

Also Snitsky is good when he is booked as a psychopathic heel with no teeth abnormalities/foot fetishes,he proved this during his first feud with Kane after the infamous baby angle.
 
The truth is they both cant wrestle.If should chose i would pick snitsky because khali's popular in india, but why is snitsky even on the raw roster? This guy is so horrible to watch no cheers no boo's mcmahon should just fire him.
 
I just think it's kind of funny how Snitsky might be the most complex character the WWE has had in the last few years. First, he kills Lita and Kane's unborn child, and then starts with the "It wasn't my fault!" phrase. Later, he gets to a point where he revels in doing what he did, by putting Kane on the shelf, and reciting a cute poem about the situation during Lita and Edge's "wedding".

Later, he goes from having a foot fetish, to having homoerotic encounters with Heidenreich and Tomko (Team Beard should have gotten a bigger push!). During this entire period, he had some pretty funny moments.

He gets relegated to Heat purgatory for awhile, before coming back as a psychopath who likes to inflict pain on others, and doesn't brush his teeth. It's also revealed that he doesn't know who his father was.

At least he also has a repertoire, whereas Khali has a very limited moveset, and is a pretty one-dimensional character. I would much rather watch a marathon of Snitsky matches over Khali matches for this very reason.
 
Ahhhh. moveset, moveset, moveset. Dooooessnt matter. Becuase with all those extra, spiffy moves Snitsky does, he does them to utter crickets. The main couldnt get crowd heat if he was preforming matches in hell. Kahli , on the other hand, plays his role very very well, and gets tons of heat, and frightens little children. No one gives a fuck about snitsky. everyone hates Kahli. So therefore Kahli is loads better. The logic is fairly simple.
 
Ahhhh. moveset, moveset, moveset. Dooooessnt matter. Becuase with all those extra, spiffy moves Snitsky does, he does them to utter crickets. The main couldnt get crowd heat if he was preforming matches in hell. Kahli , on the other hand, plays his role very very well, and gets tons of heat, and frightens little children. No one gives a fuck about snitsky. everyone hates Kahli. So therefore Kahli is loads better. The logic is fairly simple.

Snitsky used to ave heat till became a toe sucking freak, then after that he was just going downhill. The WWE thinks fans would forget that, but it was when he wnet to that gimmick he went down hill. Look how long it took for the fans toforget Mark Henry did an angle in which he kissed a man, then had sex with Mae Young who had a hand. I think its time to release the big man and let TNA have him.
 
Ahhhh. moveset, moveset, moveset. Dooooessnt matter. Becuase with all those extra, spiffy moves Snitsky does, he does them to utter crickets. The main couldnt get crowd heat if he was preforming matches in hell. Kahli , on the other hand, plays his role very very well, and gets tons of heat, and frightens little children. No one gives a fuck about snitsky. everyone hates Kahli. So therefore Kahli is loads better. The logic is fairly simple.

As much as I agree Snitsky sucks (even if I did find the whole, foot-fetish, wasn't my fault phase amusing), Khali is the worst wrestler of ALL TIME without question! He can barely walk let alone wrestle and as for drawing heat, its not in a boo the heel kind of marketable way, its in a the whole world except India completely hates this guy kind of way. That sir is not marketable, everyone wants him gone, they don't want to see him in a match with anyone and no-one wants to work with him. Hell even Batista was embarresed when he won the title, he thought it was a disgrace to the belt, yes Batista, the worlds greatest wrestler :blink: said it was a disgrace!
 
First of all, both of them suck uber donkey balls. Greak Khali is just talking gibberish, while Snitsky isn't pretty for the naked eye. I'll say, however, that Khali can put up a C feud (vs. Cena at Judgement Day and One Night Stand) while Snitsky can draw less heat then a fly humping walls can. Snitsky's moveset is so boring, while Khali can sell a little bit. I would have to say Snitsky is worse then Khali.

But I'd rather have both released.
 
Wow this is a tough one. I'm going to have to go with Khali on this one though by a very slim margin. The guy is just so limited in the ring that I have a hard time getting into any of his matches. While Snitsky is no wrestling god by any means, he is a little more athletic and while his matches bore me, they don't bore me as much as Khali's. The sad thing was that there were rumors going around saying Snitsky was going to have a main event push in the next two years. UUUGGGGHHHHH!!!!!
 
Wow, what a choice!

Whatching Khali wrestle is like watching a turtle fuck a football! It's slow, akward as hell, and painful to watch! The thing he has is presence and duh his massive size.

As for Snits, well, he is atleast passable in the ring. He just has nothing going on. No charisma, nothing that makes the fans care one way or another. Not to mention his look just doesn't fit. He could work, but they need to give him some kind of gimmick. Maybe something like the old Mankind, everyone picked on me, so now I will hurt people type thing.
 
I say Snitsky because his gimmick is atrocious. What ever happened to the "baby killer" Gene Snitsky, or the "It wasn't my fault" Gene Snitsky? I actually got a kick out of that gimmick. Otherwise, now, Snitsky is an eye soar to watch. Trust me, Khali is not better in the ring, but at least he as the look of a killer or of someone who could easily succeed in the ring. Snitsky on the other hand just look like one big goofy bastard.
 
Im not going to bother answering the question, Because the WWE sould just FIRE THEM BOTH!

There just so both terrible in aint funny, all Snitsky does is squash people, and Khali struggles to move in the ring. But if i had to pick one over the other i would pick Khali simply on the fact that he is a giant, and that does get people interested somehow. Plus his popular in Inida, which i wish wasnt true cause i just want him released along with Snitsky, they both really provide nothing.

In the end, Snitsky does squat for the WWE, while Khali does serve a pupose and is popular, unfortunely! Why cant Snitsky just go lick peoples feet outside of the WWE for a living and Khali open his own promotion in India lol, anthing, just get the hell out of Wrestling! Im sure the Indians would love it, and Snitsky can even join, since they both dont know how to wrestle, they can be co-owners lol.
 
Snitsky by far, In wwe khali but not as a pro wrestler. Khali is actually a really good wrestler for the size he is ive seena bout 5 of his japanese matches and they are really good snitsky ont he other hand is dreadful in the ring and even though he ahs lost the whole "IT WASNT MY FAULT" gimmick he still sucks big time. Khali is dreadful in WWE because the only let him have a 5 moves in his movset.
 
Don't even need to think about this. Khali is worse (Someone actually died after wrestling this guy!!!!)

Khali is dreadful in WWE because the only let him have a 5 moves in his movset.

That i can understand, but his selling of moves is just as bad. It's not the same as Goldberg coming out doing 2 slams, a spear and then the jackhammer in 5 minutes. At least he sold moves when he was against a formidable opponent. Khali stands around for 15 minutes doing head chops and big boots over and over and then a pathetic submission. If he used the same force on Mysterio's head that he did on a melon or basketball, Rey would be dead. His only 2 WRESTLING moves are the vice grip and the Khali bomb (double hand chokeslam or tree slam whatever you wanna call it), and his only impressive move is a standing leg lariat that he pulls out once in a blue moon.
Moveslist and selling moves is a totally different thing IMO and Khali sucks at both.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,851
Messages
3,300,884
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top