The WWE has royally screwed themselves with letting guys go via release. All they do is give them media/tv exposure and then release them. Once they get released (If they havent already been to TNA) they go there and draw more media attention to TNA...Totally hurting the WWE fanbase. Yes they have up and comers such as Legacy and the Hardy's and other young talent, but would it really hurt the WWE THAT much to have 3 solid shows? Spread your young talent out equally. But again..what do i know?
I have no problem with the guys you mentioned. But who other than Angle has benefitted for more than 5 minutes by going to TNA? I guess Matt Morgan is doing okay. But Foley, Rhino, Dudleyz, New Age Outlaws, Scott Steiner, Test, Christian... these guys saw initial pushes and then fell quickly off of the main-event map. Even Jeff Hardy saw the grass is greener on Vince's side of the fence. Matt never signed with TNA. Christian apparently felt it better to be mid-carder in WWE than upper mid-carder/former world champ in TNA. Some have faltered for different reasons than others. TNA is still running consistently in the 1's if Im not mistaken. WWE has had reasons for letting most go that quite frankly, I probably would have done the same. There are a few that shocked me because I didn't get why but overall, these guys asked to be let go, didnt follow policy, or just didnt fit what they were trying to accomplish.