Which ******ed Monkey in WWE Creative

[Shadowmancer]

Has come up with the names for PPVs? They all fucking suck balls, except for Wrestlemania and SummerSlam, Wild Card doesn't sound too bad, but the rest are all match types and leads to fucking stupid statements, like "At Money In the Bank, I am going to beat you in the Money in the Bank match"

Fucking ******ed Monkeys that Vince loves to higher now, Rhesus Monkeys are more creative.

 

[Richard]

Nobody complained about there being a PPV called Royal Rumble which is also a match...

 

[Shadowmancer]

But there is only one Royal rumble, and if they aren't involved in the Rumble they are talking about their standard match for a championship. Going into a gimmick PPV with the same Gimmick Name as the the gimmick match they are in is fucking stupid, especially since it is for the title. WWE ******ed Monkeys don't have an inkling of the concept of build and that Gimmick Matches are supposed to be blowout matches to end feuds.

 

[Richard]

Has come up with the names for PPVs? They all fucking suck balls, except for Wrestlemania and SummerSlam, Wild Card doesn't sound too bad, but the rest are all match types and leads to fucking stupid statements, like "At Money In the Bank, I am going to beat you in the Money in the Bank match"

They do this with the Royal Rumble match too. The concept of the Money in the Bank PPV should be irrelevent from your complaint because they will say "This Sunday at Royal Rumble, I will win the Royal Rumble match". Which hasn't been a problem in the history of RR.

I can see where you're coming from though with concepts like Hell in a Cell where there is like 3 HIAC matches.

These specialty matches like HIAC should be blow off matches used for the biggest feud at a time and to end it, where as Cena and Orton kept going after HIAC.

 

[Alex]

I think Royal Rumble get's away with it because it was the only one of it's kind for 20 odd years, if every PPV has a match name it's going to sound boring and repetitive

 

[Coco]

MITB as its own PPV has potential. Perhaps qualifiers on the night of will give us a properly stacked MITB match rather than one that tries to convince us Shelton or Finlay are legit contenders.

Fatal Four Way, on the other hand, seems like a little much. Another great way to give creative the month off. "We don't need new feuds or fresh ideas. We need to plug the existing feuds into the gimmick of the month." I'm not sure who I'm quoting. You guys understand.

 

[Little Jerry Lawler]

The first MITB set a high standard that the other four just couldn't come close to.

 

[Coco]

Disagree. Two and three come very close for my money. Four and five were the ones that dropped the ball.

 

[Wrath]

It could get worse. Just think about Breaking Point called Submission Matches.

 

[Coco]

WWE wouldn't change Breaking Point. They know the people won't stand for it.

 

[Slyfox696]

How the fuck is "Wrestlemania" a good name? It's just been around for so long you've come to accept it.

 

[Little Jerry Lawler]

Disagree. Two and three come very close for my money. Four and five were the ones that dropped the ball.

2006 was awful. Nobody thought Flair, Hardy, or Finlay was going to win it. Lashley was still a rookie and it was going to come down to Kennedy and RVD and it happened.

2007 was just a clusterfuck of epic proportions. Edge and Orton had no business being in there and Booker T shouldn't have been in there as well but that was mainly because of HHH being injured.

 

[Lee]

How the fuck is "Wrestlemania" a good name? It's just been around for so long you've come to accept it.

EXACTLY I was thinking that last night, and summerslam.

 

[Coco]

In 2006, people certainly thought Flair and Lashley had a chance. Lashley seemed like he was on the verge of a mega-push in many people's eyes and Vengeance was in Flair's hometown. There was definately some talk about those two winning from where I was sitting.

2007 had Edge, Orton, and Booker all looking like likely winners. "Why else would the be in the match?" was the common logic.

 

[y2straightedge]

They quit Breaking Point because Bret Hart came back and they didn't want to stand on his country again.(Montreal held BP)

 

[Shadowmancer]

How the fuck is "Wrestlemania" a good name? It's just been around for so long you've come to accept it.

Wrestlemania isn't a match type is it? You can talk about previous Wrestlemania's. Talk about previous Elimination Chambers then the question occurs of are you talking previous matches or PPVs.

 

[Slyfox696]

Wrestlemania isn't a match type is it?

Neither is Night of Champions or Bragging Rights, but you called those the brainchild of a ******ed monkey as well.

 

[Shadowmancer]

but they are better than Hell in a cell and Elimination Chamber