When all is said and done, Cena will be considered greater than Stone Cold

JGlass

Unregistered User
The WWE has produced few superstars that have truly become legends of the business. Sure, they have created perhaps over a hundred wrestlers whose names will never be forgotten by the true wrestling fans, but very few of those wrestlers can join the elite list of wrestlers that every fan must now. Names like Funk, Flair, Race, Rhodes, these are some of the men that made their names famous around the world for their wrestling abilities that were not products of the WWE... but that's not to say the WWE hasn't created many itself. Hulk Hogan was probably the first wrestling megastar, a man that made American wrestling more profitable than ever before, and a man that people would put up hundreds of dollars to see live. Bret Hart brought Canadian dedication to the WWF and showed that you didn't have to be a giant to win the World Title. Dwayne Johnson, better known as The Rock cut promos that would only be rivaled by those of Ric Flair himself and could have the audience loving him or hating him in the wink of an eye... or the raise of an eyebrow.

However, the two biggest superstars to ever wrestle in America since Hulk Hogan embodied their era of wrestling perfectly. Each man was undoubtedly the biggest name in wrestling during their time in the ring, and both men managed to transcend wrestling and become household names even in homes that didn't watch wrestling. I am of course talking about Stone Cold Steve Austin and John Cena.

Stone Cold Steve Austin didn't burst onto the scene like John Cena. He spent four years in WCW where he accomplished little, especially compared to his time in the WWF. WCW didn't think Austin was a good enough star to promote, so they cut him loose. After spending one year wrestling for ECW, Austin went to the WWF, and this is where the real story begins to unfold. After being managed by Ted DiBiase for a few months, Stone Cold won the King of the Ring tournament by beating Jake the Snake Roberts. After he won, Stone Cold delivered his most famous line of all time. As an insult to Jake Robert's religious character, Austin said, "You sit there and you thump your Bible, and you say your prayers, and it didn't get you anywhere! Talk about your psalms, talk about John 3:16... Austin 3:16 says I just whooped your ass!"

I could recap Stone Cold's entire career for you, but you know the rest of it. From feuding with McMahon to The Undertaker to The Rock to Triple H, Stone Cold took every opportunity and made it into something amazing. Furthermore, he represented the current wrestling product better than any other. In the late 90s/early 00s wrestling was one of the most edgy forms of entertainment. There was violence, cursing, scantily clad women, blood, and story lines that involved very controversial topics. Stone Cold was a cussin' drinkin' sonuvabitch who didn't care about his job, his fans, or himself. He was a true anti-hero in every aspect of the word, and the fans loved him for it.

John Cena burst onto the scene by nearly beating Kurt Angle, enduring both the Ankle Lock and the Angle Slam. It wouldn't take long for John Cena to become the company's champion and face of the WWE, becoming WWE Champion just about two years after joining the company. Since then he has feuded with nearly every major star the company has produced, including Triple H, Kurt Angle, Randy Orton, Edge, Batista, and Shawn Michaels.

Like Stone Cold, John Cena represents his era of wrestling perfectly. While Stone Cold's era was all about edginess, John Cena's era saw a return to the more family oriented product that fans saw during the days of Hogan. Despite being limited by the intensity of the feuds and amount of violence they can show on television under the PG-rating, John Cena has managed to flourish in the current WWE landscape. Though he has struggled with detractors for many years it would seem that the majority of fans have come around on Cena, realizing he is the real deal.

But how do these wrestlers compare? Is the rough-around-the-edges Steve Austin the greatest of all time, or is the clean-cut John Cena looking to take that title for himself? In 2009, when Stone Cold was inducted to the hall of fame, Vince McMahon said that Stone Cold was the best wrestler he had ever seen, but could he be saying the same thing in 15 years at John Cena's induction? When all is said and done, which of these men will be considered the better wrestler.

The answer is John Cena. It's a hard concept for any fan that has seen Stone Cold in action to wrap their head around, but John Cena is that good. They are possibly the two greatest wrestlers in the history of American Wrestling, but when all is said and done, John Cena will be remembered as the best.

Some might say Stone Cold made wrestling what it is today, but that accolade goes to Hulk Hogan, not Steve Austin. Stone Cold did, however, make wrestling what it was in the late 90s, an era where you could kick your boss in the nads and still have a job, an era where you could flip off the fans and still have them scream your name, an era where nothing was too sacred to be desecrated by professional wrestling.

But John Cena is the man that made wrestling return to what it was today. He almost personifies the metamorphosis that we saw in the WWE. Cena started out as a thug, a rapper with a foul mouth and no respect for anyone, but he transformed into a clean cut soldier, a guy who passed on the funny business and let his fists do the talking... though he wasn't afraid to mix it up verbally either. He would tell his opponents flat out that he was better than them and that he would beat them, and that's the formula we see for most top faces in the WWE today. Cena, Triple H, Edge, Big Show... all of them will throw a few jokes at their opponent, but when it's time to get serious, they are as somber as a wake.

Stone Cold has also delivered his fair share of amazing feuds. His most memorable will probably be his work with Vince McMahon. This was the feud that really helped Steve Austin exactly realize who Stone Cold was. He would flip his boss off, kick him in the gut, and fill his sports car up with cement. However, he has also had epic feuds with The Rock and Triple H, and even Bret Hart.

Cena has had more than his fair share of great feuds as well. His feud with Edge is one of the best feuds of the past decade. Just this past year he had a great feud with Batista and an even more epic feud with Nexus. Furthermore, John Cena has no less than 5 years of wrestling left in him, probably more considering he's only thirty three. It's quite possible that some of his best feuds are in the near future.

So what makes me think John Cena will be better than Stone Cold when it's all said and done? After the analysis so far it would seem that they're about even, and if one of these men is better than the other it would be Stone Cold... but the future belongs to Cena.

One thing that makes me think Cena will surpass Austin in excellence is the fact that he is the uncontested face of American professional wrestling. When Stone Cold was wrestling he had to compete with The Rock, and Triple H was always trying to be the best in the world as well, and this is only after WCW was no longer competition. John Cena has the scene all to himself. The only other wrestlers right now that can even come close to matching Cena's popularity are Randy Orton and Triple H, but Triple H's time has passed and Randy Orton's character will never be as attractive to the casual fan as John Cena's will be.

John Cena has just as much of "it" as Stone Cold, and he's only getting more of "it" every appearance he makes. You know what I mean when I say "it", it is what separates the superstars from the wrestlers, what separates the Shawn Michaels and Bret Harts of the world from the unnamed masses, wrestlers we have long forgotten about. Nearly every wrestler has the ability to put on a decent match, and they all know how to talk, but some guys just have this thing that makes them more fun to watch wrestle and more fun to listen to than the rest. That's "it" and both John Cena and Stone Cold have an abundant amount of it. Nobody in the world could get a crowd to react better than Stone Cold back when he was wrestling, and John Cena has fulfilled that post now. However, John Cena has had to deal with something Stone Cold rarely had to deal with, smarks, and Cena has met the challenge perfectly. Whenever he encounters a hostile audience he manages to still come out looking like the good guy, like the a valiant prince in enemy lands. Furthermore, he's just about silenced his detractors by driving home the point that he is WITHOUT A DOUBT the most entertaining man in American Professional Wrestling, and he's done it through being charming, building up his character, and exuding "it".

Finally, I can't think of a better way to end than with the end. Austin's last match was a losing effort against The Rock at Wrestlemania 19, and he'd be fired the next night by Eric Bischoff, the same man who didn't think Austin was a marketable superstar in the first place. This is hardly a farewell worthy of a star of Austin's magnitude. Furthermore, Austin really became a difficult person to work with towards the end of his run in the WWE, making it difficult for creative to book him. One can only imagine Cena will get a hero's goodbye after the amount of life he's dedicated to the WWE. I wouldn't be surprised to see Cena booked strong to the end before he ultimately does the right thing and loses his last match at Wrestlemania. I can tell you this much, he won't be "fired" or used to promote some other storyline. When John Cena retires it will be about John Cena, not the GM, his opponent, or anyone else, just John Cena.

So what do you think? Do you think John Cena will one day be considered better than Stone Cold? Do you think he's already there?
 
Well, as much as I am a fan of John Cena, IMO he will NEVER be better than Stone Cold Steve Austin. Yes John Cena doesnt give up easily & is making a name for himself, but he just doesnt measure up to the legacy of Stone Cold.

Even when John Cena is a face, he still gets boo'ed. A lot of people do criticize him (tho I disagree with a lot of what others say about him). Stone Cold on the other hand, had fan appreciation as a heel & face cuz everyone accepted him completely & cuz of his good work. JMO.
 
Very well written JGlass. I will have to admit that despite being a huge fan of Stone Cold Steve Austin the gulf between him and Cena is not as wide as it looks.

Will Cena be greater than Austin one day? Or has he already surpassed Austin? I think the answer to either question depends on what you think is more important in wrestling. On one side we have a guy who did not wrestle at the topmost level for a huge part of his career but created many indelible moments. On the other hand we have a guy who has wrestled at the topmost level for almost as long as Austin's career but in all fairness has not created as many moments that stick in your memory.

That is the most important point in my opinion. When you think about Austin, you are flooded with so many great memories right from his Austin 3:16 promo, to his match with Bret Hart at Mania, beating Bret up in an ambulance, to stunning McMahon and so on. Now when you think of Cena the first thing that comes to your mind is that he is the face of the company but does not have the respect of all the fans in the audience. I do not think that that point can be argued despite the fact that the male audience have cheered for the guy on occasion. His greatest moments are his feuds with Edge and beating Triple H as well as HBK at Mania. Surely they are great moments but they do not compare to any of Austin's moments.

Then there is the point of smarkiness. Sure Cena has had to face more smarkiness than Austin even though Austin had to face a bit. However this smarkiness will go against Cena. What you are asking is if Cena will be considered to be better than SCSA. The smarkiness will just multiply as the days go and Cena will always have to face that smarkiness. To fans like you it who understand how biased smarkiness can be it makes Cena look in a positive light. But on the whole the smarkiness is contributing to the Cena hate and thus is being detrimental to his legacy.

Finally there is the question of his retirement. Though it is impossible to predict the future it certainly looks like Cena will go out like a champion unlike Stone Cold who went out as a GM. But has that contributed to the downfall of his legacy? While most would agree that Austin did not have the perfect retirement, it is not something you think of when you think about Austin. You will first talk about his feud with Mcmahon, then his feud with Rock, then HHH and Bret Hart before you say that he deserved a better retirement. Maybe Cena's retirement is the only thing you will talk about when he finally hangs up his boots. While his feud with Edge was great and so was his feud with Triple H and HBK but I don't think they had the great moments that would make those feuds memorable.

Finally I would like to say that remembrance depends how each guy will be percieved at the end of the day. Stone Cold will be remembered as the best superstar in one of the most cutthroat eras of wrestling, cutthroat both for the competition between the two companies as well as due to the presence of so many great stars competing for limelight. He did not do it alone but he will be remembered as the man who was responsible for the WWF's victory over WCW. He will be remembered for all his great feuds with Mcmahon, Rock, Bret and HHH.

Cena will be remembered as the face of the company in an era in which the wrestling business was in a slump. Moreover he had to follow charismatic guys like Austin and Rock and no matter how charismatic he is, it will always be seen as a downer by the fans. He will also be remembered as a controversial superstar due to his mixed crowd reactions. That is something that he as well as the announcers publicly acknowledge. While he may joke about it now, I am pretty sure that it will be detrimental to his legacy.

So I'm pretty sure that Austin won't be surpassed by Cena.
 
Can we all be so sure that if John Cena would still have the head of steam he has if he had to contend with the type of injuries SCSA did, i.e., that infamous piledriver from Owen Hart that went horribly wrong? I personally have nothing against Cena but I don't get the same feeling with him that I do when I hear the glass break, when I hear the straings of "Pomp and Circumstance" (Randy Savage), Real American (Hogan), etc.
 
SCSA and Cena will be equals in their own right. SCSA was the king of the Attitude ERA. Cena is the King of the PG era. When you think back to the 80's and early to mid 90's you think of Hogan. When you think of the late 90's early 2000's its stone cold and the Rock. Now its John Cena. All great performers for their respective times.
 
I'm a huge John Cena fan but I don't know if he will be remembered as better then Austin because Austin in a very short period of time beat most all of Hogan's drawing records and for merchandise sales. There was a period of time when Austin was on top that the WWE were outdrawing boxing events for ppv buys. Nothing against Cena because he does have some things in common with Austin. They are both the biggest draws in their respective eras, they both have brought in the next generation of fans and they both will be remembered as all time greats while Austin has already gone into the HOF, Cena is a sure bet to in the future when his career ends. No one knows what the future holds but as of now Austin will go down as the bigger star. Cena I believe will go down as one of the hardest working and most respectable stars in history and there is nothing wrong with that and Cena will and should be put in the same class as a Hogan and Austin for sure.
 
Absolutely not.

As you can tell by my sig, I am no fan of Cena in the least, but I can respect the guy. While Stone Cold on the other hand, I've worked at hotels he's stayed at and I can tell you, he's a walking piece of crap in every sense of the word. I'm saying this to show that I am no fan of Stone Cold's.

But Cena just isn't in the same league. People STILL chant Austin's "What" catchphrase over eight years since he stopped using it. When Austin came out he was unanimously cheered and universally loved, while depending on what city and arena your in, anywhere from 20-95% of the crowd is booing Cena.

Both men are very guilty of the "Five Moves of Doom" but Austin did it out of physical necessity, and he was able to keep matches with anyone more entertaining than Cena can (IMO)

One point that was made was Austin existed in an era with The Rock and Triple H where Cena pretty much has no competition for his top spot. If anything I think that gives the edge to austin, and truth be told, if Cena was around during that time I don't think he'd even be considered for the spotlight among those three.

I honestly believe Cena's not the greatest wrestler now, nevermind of all time.
 
this made me laugh when i first read the title i actually thought it was a joke but then i saw you were actually serious lol John Cena couldnt hold Stone Colds Jock Strap Austin was a better everything the only thing they have in common is that Cena can sell millions of tshirts to little kids where Stone Cold sold millions of tshirts to everybody and i dont remember ever seeing john cena merch in clothing stores unlike stone cold, but Stone Cold was THE Man in an era that had The Rock Triple H Undertaker Kurt Angle Big Show Kane Mick Foley Bret Hart its not even close and if you want final proof just look at the ratings of the wwf in the 90's and the wwe ratings today All because of Stone Cold
 
Objective information--like who sold the most merchandise, tickets, and so on--is what counts. Even with that information one would still have to measure the impact that Stone Cold has had. Meaning, what was the state of prowrestling prior to Stone Cold versus Stone Cold's (as opposed to the Ring Master's) arrival versus post Stone Cold?

Then take the same analysis of Cena from his debut to present. I bet you'd find that Stone Cold made the biggest impact on the industry while Cena sells the most merchandise. So who is the best, statistically? The answer to that question is did sales (of anything WWE) die down, remain level, or spike post Stone Cold? Did sales spike during Cena's era? What about ratings? Did ratings die down, remain level, or spike post Stone Cold? Did ratings spike during Cena's era?

I know the subject wasn't stated as a question, but the answer is "No": Cena will not be considered greater than Austin. Austin paved the way for the Cenas of prowrestling. Austin did for the wrestling industry what Lesnar is doing for MMA.
 
Honestly, I think the only thing Cena has on Stone Cold is health and timing, and this may be due to the era in which they wrestled but I have so many iconic memories of Stone Cold, from passing out in a pool of his own blood(notice sig), to having his neck broken by Owen Hart, to throwing The Rock's belt into the river, to every WWE official he Stunned during 97, all the way up to the big boss, to giving the finger to whoever he pleased, to winning his first title against HBK and DX at WM, to beer bathing the corporation, to being crucified by UT, to being fired and rehired. I mean, everytime you saw Stone Cold something shocking was going to happen.

John Cena, he's good, but he either isn't as good as Stone Cold or he's limited by his era, I mean I really can't think of that many iconic Cena moments, maybe that has to do with the fact that probably only one of those Stone Cold moments could be done in todays landscape.

Anyhow, I kind of see John Cena as more of a Bret Hart level guy than a Stone Cold, he's holding down his era, but if wrestling doesn't die out I think the next era's top face will be a bigger deal than Cena.
 
You guys are talking about Cena being a lower draw than Austin and Austin being a more of a bigger influence.BUT you guys are forgetting that these two guys worked/work in entirely different eras.Put Austin in today's era and how will he work,surely not the beer drinking red-neck gimmick.As for having more influence,ask any kid right now,whose his idol and you'll know it.People also say that Austin had a limited move-set due to injury,well thats right,but you can't say Cena himself says that he'll only do 5 moves.Its up to the creative or the management.
But when you look at the overall picture,Austin is a bigger star than Cena as of right now.Why because he almost single handedly SAVED the company.But untill Cena retires,we can't clearly tell.
 
I can respect everyones opinions of cena and austin. It is hard to compare them both until Cena's career is over. Two different era's to look at. The more reserved cena, or the cena who can't control himself somtimes on interviews and gets fined. Look at Austin, attitude era. he bassically did things that nobody else did. He was the bad boy of the company, the rebel, and the guy people loved to come and see. Same with cena in how people feel. The only difference is that Austin was loved no matter whether he was face or heel. Cena is hated by not only myself but millions of others as well. Austin had a lot of different variations of matches and moves leading up to the stunner. Cena has 4-5 moves he does every match and it's over. It gets a little old. Austin was a better performer because of the way he won matches and his mic skills. Cena has only mic skills. Austin was the full package. Cena may have the physic but he is clumsy at best in ring. Since you have to compare AUSTIN is nothing but the best between the two. For you other people who want to say these two guys are the best ever? Wake up. If it wasn't for Flair and Hogan wrestling would be NOTHING!!!! Nobody matches up to flair and hogan.
 
It's not a very easy question to answer. Steve Austin was of course the larger draw and has had a huge influence on wrestling since he cut that '3:16' promo at King of the Ring 96', but that doesn't mean that he's superior to Cena. Steve Austin was one damn good wrestler prior to his neck injury, and even for points after it he was able to have great matches (SummerSlam 2001 for example), but on a regular basis, I am more entertained by John Cena. Cena has the ability to pull good matches out of just about anyone, hell he was one of the few to get a reasonable match out of The Great Khali. Austin didn't have that ability, he could have good matches, but only when his opponents were good. From a wrestling perspective, I'd say Cena was better.

Right now, Cena is the top draw in WWE, the ratings are pretty low and PPV buy-rates are down, the WWE is a recognisable brand still, but not really because of Cena, but because people still remember Steve Austin. Other than Hulk Hogan, Steve Austin is probably the first name people think about when you say wrestling. Cena isn't even in the top 10. Cena, make no mistake is a damn fine performer and is the face of his generation, he's going to go down as one of the all time greats, but for my money, John Cena still has awhile to go before surpassing Steve Austin. It's not as far as people think though.
 
do u smoke crack sir? cena over austin!!!???? u say cena made wrestling what is today well ur right he has officially made WWe a show for kids and has ripped the heart out of the attitude era. u say cena had a better rise to stardom faster than austin yah HELOO VINCE MADE CENA THAT WAY!!!!!!!! how naive are u to think that cena has payed more dues than austin. Austin still wrestled with two blown out kness and still was on the top of his game!!! nice to see u wrote so much for this thread that is just completely wrong!!!! CENA Over AUSTIN my god what is this world coming to. i can on and on but im sure other people have listed more facts that austin will always be greater than cena .

stupid stupid thread
 
Cena is top 10 worthy (there's no question about that), but there is no way he'll be considered greater than Austin.

Austin was the key figure in WWE winning the Monday Night Wars, he made arguably more money than anyone else in the history of the business. He transformed wrestling into the Attitude Era (niche period that worked); where the WWE went to the highest of heights that any promotion has ever seen. And they haven't gotten close to that again.

No one has.

Cena on the other hand has been the best thing to happen to WWE after Rock & Austin left. He saved the company after Triple H couldn't carry it, and he's the most over guy in wrestling and the biggest draw.

But he isn't under the pressure that Austin was from another company right on their heels trying to kill it.

Hogan will always be #1, Austin will be #2 and Cena will just have to settle for #3.
 
One point that was made was Austin existed in an era with The Rock and Triple H where Cena pretty much has no competition for his top spot.

I really have to draw issue with that. Cena has being on top for around 5 years now. Triple H, Undertaker, Kurt Angle, Chris Jericho, Batista, Shawn Michaels....all being around some time or another and he has remained the top dog in WWE's eyes. Your no competition statement stinks I am afraid.

I am no Cena mark by the way. But I respect what he has done for Wrestling. Maybe not the best technical wrestler we have ever seen but he can talk, he can interact with the crowd, he puts on a good show, his merchandise flys off the shelves, he draws big and he does alot outside of the ring for WWE aswell.

An Austin yet? Probably not. An Austin by the time he retires? Without doubt.
 
all I can say to this is ..HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA keep dreaming fanboy.

John Cena is forced down our throats and his fans are women and children. When Austin wrestled GROWN ASS MEN were wearing his shirts, not just the women and children. You said that Austin did little in WCW? He was in one of the most colorful tag teams in tag team history with the Hollywood Blondes. Had he not suffered the injury he did that ended up getting him released, who knows what he may have become there. Cena's entirely persona is built around Hulk Hogans character. If Austin, Rock and HHH were still in this thing and didn't want to explore other ventures Cena would be an IC title contender with little air time compared to what he has now.

I respect the worker and entertainer that Cena is but he couldn't hold a candle to the aforementioned wrestlers in their primes and his legacy will NEVER come come to Austins or Hogans. Maybe Rocks because a legion of fans feel like the Rock sold them out. Your comment is strickly based on fanboyism. I mean you didn't even include Hogan. Hogan means more to wrestling than Cena and Austin and that hurts me to say considering I am a huge Austin mark. To the younger generation Cena may get the bigger pop because they didn't watch when Austin was filling arenas with 3:16 shirts everywhere. To the eye of a real wrestling fan, Cena is nothing compared to these guys.
 
all I can say to this is ..HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA keep dreaming fanboy.

John Cena is forced down our throats and his fans are women and children. When Austin wrestled GROWN ASS MEN were wearing his shirts, not just the women and children. You said that Austin did little in WCW? He was in one of the most colorful tag teams in tag team history with the Hollywood Blondes. Had he not suffered the injury he did that ended up getting him released, who knows what he may have become there. Cena's entirely persona is built around Hulk Hogans character. If Austin, Rock and HHH were still in this thing and didn't want to explore other ventures Cena would be an IC title contender with little air time compared to what he has now.


Austin wouldnt of got over with PG restrictions. That is fact my friend. He got over because he was vicious, he swore, he brutalised...the shackles of today would not let his character develop.

I'll give you Rock, if he was still around he would be number 1, but he would also struggle in the PG environment, especially as a face - no poontang pie references or strudel. He was more entertaining as a heel anyway. His greatest WWE work was 2003 for my money.
 
not a bad read, but it is 2 different eras it is hard to compare, cena is in the pg era, stone cold was sticking his middle fingers out in there air at will, when it is all said and done cena will go down as one of the greats, but will never be compared to stone cold, the only thing he might beat stone cold in is merchandise, maybe, but they both get totally different reactions, the roof pops when stone cold comes out and you hear the glass break. you don't get the same feel from cena
 
I totally disagree. I think he'll never reach the level of Stone Cold or be remembered as better than stone cold for a number of reasons.

For one, and it's not Cena's fault, Stone Cold wrestled during arguably the best "era" of wrestling ever. That alone will keep Stone Cold on a higher pedestal.

Stone Cold was loved by virtually everyone even as a heel, face, and tweener. Cena is not loved by all fans and has even gotten the "you suck" or "you can't wrestle" chants.

Stone Cold has memorable catchphrases that will go down in professional wrestling history. "What???!!" "That's the bottomline 'cause Stone Cold said so...." "If you want Stone Cold to <fill in the blank> gimmie a hell yeah!"

Stone Cold's ongoing feud with Vince McMahon was legendary.

When I think of John Cena, there isn't anything specific that I will remember him for.

He's had some good feuds but nothing legendary, like Stone Cold-Rock.

Name the last epic match John Cena was in?

"The Champ is here" and "You can't see me" I guess are his catchphrases, but no one will remember that.

John Cena will go down in history as the top star in this generation but nothing anywhere near Stone Cold or Hulk Hogan.
 
Isn't it fair to say each of the following however?

1. When Austin took over as "The King of the Attitude Era," the wrestling world had already been turned on its ear by Hollywood Hogan's heel turn and the nWo. He took over a product that was more ready to pop and was on an upswing. He benefitted from the rise of Triple H, The Rock, Kurt Angle, the 2nd prime of The Undertaker, Kane, Chris Jericho, Eddie Guerrero, Chris Benoit, etc. Austin had a far better supporting cast. Furthermore, Austin got over huge at a time when cheaper, more risque tactics were being used on an audience desperately seeking rebellion. The use of the word "ass" caused a great big pop no matter who used it. Just remember Michael Hayes' face the first time Austin used it following King of the Ring. Austin also had the torch passed to him but BOTH Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels.

2. When Cena took over as "The King of the PG Era," wrestling was at its lowest point in a long while. Content restrictions took away from the edginess as the PG era began. Wrestling had fully cooled off long before Cena arrived. Who passed the torch to Cena? JBL maybe? His supporting cast consisted of JBL, Edge, an oft-injured Undertaker, a returning Shawn Michaels, Triple H, and for only a short time, Angle and Lesnar. While Austin got to get over on The Rock and The Undertaker, Cena had to cut his teeth with Umaga and Great Khali. He's had to do it without the benefit of being the popular anti-hero.

Isn't it safe to say that Cena has "done more with less" than Austin has? Cena has also more successfully transitioned into other areas of the media, such as film and music.

I'm not saying I agree with the OP, but it's a valid concern to bring up.
 
Isn't it fair to say each of the following however?

1. When Austin took over as "The King of the Attitude Era," the wrestling world had already been turned on its ear by Hollywood Hogan's heel turn and the nWo. He took over a product that was more ready to pop and was on an upswing. He benefitted from the rise of Triple H, The Rock, Kurt Angle, the 2nd prime of The Undertaker, Kane, Chris Jericho, Eddie Guerrero, Chris Benoit, etc. Austin had a far better supporting cast. Furthermore, Austin got over huge at a time when cheaper, more risque tactics were being used on an audience desperately seeking rebellion. The use of the word "ass" caused a great big pop no matter who used it. Just remember Michael Hayes' face the first time Austin used it following King of the Ring. Austin also had the torch passed to him but BOTH Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels.

2. When Cena took over as "The King of the PG Era," wrestling was at its lowest point in a long while. Content restrictions took away from the edginess as the PG era began. Wrestling had fully cooled off long before Cena arrived. Who passed the torch to Cena? JBL maybe? His supporting cast consisted of JBL, Edge, an oft-injured Undertaker, a returning Shawn Michaels, Triple H, and for only a short time, Angle and Lesnar. While Austin got to get over on The Rock and The Undertaker, Cena had to cut his teeth with Umaga and Great Khali. He's had to do it without the benefit of being the popular anti-hero.

Isn't it safe to say that Cena has "done more with less" than Austin has? Cena has also more successfully transitioned into other areas of the media, such as film and music.

I'm not saying I agree with the OP, but it's a valid concern to bring up.

I somewhat agree although I would argue that even though Stone Cold "benefitted" from the rise of the superstars you mentioned, it was a lot harder to stand out and be a star with all that star power around. Yet, he reached a level equal to that of Hulk Hogan in terms of popularity even with the likes of Triple H, Jericho, The Rock, Undertaker, etc. all wrestling at that time.
 
Austin and Cena are the 2 biggest since Hogan? really? I will agree with Austin but Cena I don't The Rock is way ahead of Cena as well as Austin Bigger than Triple H and the Undertaker? No way he is bigger than any of them
 
Putting way too much into this.

I never hear people comparing Hulk Hogan to Andre the Giant.

I never hear people compare Goldberg to the Ultimate Warrior.

Overall, you really can't compare the two. It's not an intelligent thing to do. Here are my reasons why...

John Cena came into wrestling when all competition was dead. No ECW. No WCW. Just the WWE's development program.

Steve Austin was in Wrestling, when many promotions were doing well. It wasn't just the big ECW, WWE, WCW, but you had other promotions that were doing well.

Many different styles of wrestling at that time.

Not also that, but their gimmicks are so different. John Cena was the rap master, and Steve Austin had Austin 3:16, the anti-hero gimmick.

Well, John Cena is now doing the super-hero gimmick. Gets beat like no tomorrow, and comes back to delivery the punishment in return.

In my opinion. You have two different gimmicks. Both are great gimmicks for their time period.

I also think this is a big problem with wrestling now a days. We always want to compare the new stars to someone today. You can't really do that. In fact it hurts how we view wrestling.

On these posts I constantly read... Well this guy is no Rock. Or This guy could be the next Ric Flair. Your never going to get another one of those guys. Your going to have to set viewing pleasures to new characters, and realize you won't get a Stone Cold, or a Macho Man. Those characters are gone, you have to open up to new ones.

When people do this comparison, we hurt wrestling now.
 
Here's a good way to look at it.

Would the "John Cena" character have thrived and made it as big as it is now, in the Attitude Era? No.

Could Stone Cold have thrived in this year? Yes, more so than Cena.

Stone Cold was like the everyday man, and that's why so many fans related to him and loved him.

Cena just relates to the kids as a super-hero.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,851
Messages
3,300,884
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top