Mustang Sally
Sells seashells by the seashore
Yes, the injury to Rock might be the monkey-wrench thrown into the works that brought the coming Triple H-Brock III match to the forefront. Rock's misfortune is WWE's, too, and the Creative team has had to do some mighty fancy stepping to accommodate it.
Still, seeing the Brock-Trips match-up again is fine. They put on such a great show at WM29, and it does seem likely that Brock should win the feud. Since he's on a two-year contract this time around, they've got to find stuff for him to do.....and the continuing problem is that there really aren't that many people in WWE with whom he can have interesting, believable matches. (In other words, I still can't see Brock in the ring with Punk, given the disparity in sizes).
Another big problem is that Brock's contract calls for so few appearances that it's hard for the company to adequately build up an effective feud for him. Yes, he could start up with someone like Sheamus, but how would they create a storyline for the two, given Brock's limited availability?
If Sheamus starts doing promos intended to draw Brock out, is he going to be met only by......Paul Heyman? Granted, Paul E. Dangerously is one of the best talkers in the business, but it's plain his role in WWE is far more important than anything he's done here before. He's the guy who: (1) acts as Brock Lesnar's mouthpiece when standing in the ring with his "client" (2) More importantly, Paul is the guy who fills the gap for WWE Creative by making it seem as if Brock is nearby when communication from him is needed. For those times, we find ourselves looking at Paul Heyman.
Think about it. How many times have we been treated to the sight of Paul Heyman standing in the ring, telling us "his client" has instructed him to relay certain decisions? Usually, it's the wrestler himself that tells the audience just what he's gonna do to his dastardly foe. To use a stand-in to handle all this requires a performer who can make it seem real.....and Heyman does it better than anyone.
The problem is that WWE management shouldn't go to the well too often with this type of thing. Since Paul Heyman's on-air character can't really make matches, we're left with whatever Creative can come up with, given the constraints of Brock's rare appearances. That's why we have another go-around with Triple H after the Rock was forced to bow out. See?
But, while it's understandable that Heyman is used as a mouthpiece for Brock (who isn't around much and isn't a good talker when he's here), I can't for the life of me see why they've used Heyman in the same role for C.M. Punk.
What for? Not only is Punk constantly available, but he's more than capable of speaking for himself.....in fact, possibly more capable than just about anyone else. Additionally, since Punk has been cast as the ultimate loner the past two years, it seems incongruous that Heyman is involved with Punk at all.
It's overkill. If they want to use Heyman to support performers who don't speak well, give him someone like Drew McIntyre
, who many feel isn't good on the mic (I'd still love to know what a Scottish accent sounds like). Give him anyone else who needs a push but isn't a good communicator.
But not Punk; it's a waste.
Do you agree? Do you like the way they're using Paul Heyman? Is there someone other than C.M. Punk who can better utilize Heyman's services?
Still, seeing the Brock-Trips match-up again is fine. They put on such a great show at WM29, and it does seem likely that Brock should win the feud. Since he's on a two-year contract this time around, they've got to find stuff for him to do.....and the continuing problem is that there really aren't that many people in WWE with whom he can have interesting, believable matches. (In other words, I still can't see Brock in the ring with Punk, given the disparity in sizes).
Another big problem is that Brock's contract calls for so few appearances that it's hard for the company to adequately build up an effective feud for him. Yes, he could start up with someone like Sheamus, but how would they create a storyline for the two, given Brock's limited availability?
If Sheamus starts doing promos intended to draw Brock out, is he going to be met only by......Paul Heyman? Granted, Paul E. Dangerously is one of the best talkers in the business, but it's plain his role in WWE is far more important than anything he's done here before. He's the guy who: (1) acts as Brock Lesnar's mouthpiece when standing in the ring with his "client" (2) More importantly, Paul is the guy who fills the gap for WWE Creative by making it seem as if Brock is nearby when communication from him is needed. For those times, we find ourselves looking at Paul Heyman.
Think about it. How many times have we been treated to the sight of Paul Heyman standing in the ring, telling us "his client" has instructed him to relay certain decisions? Usually, it's the wrestler himself that tells the audience just what he's gonna do to his dastardly foe. To use a stand-in to handle all this requires a performer who can make it seem real.....and Heyman does it better than anyone.
The problem is that WWE management shouldn't go to the well too often with this type of thing. Since Paul Heyman's on-air character can't really make matches, we're left with whatever Creative can come up with, given the constraints of Brock's rare appearances. That's why we have another go-around with Triple H after the Rock was forced to bow out. See?
But, while it's understandable that Heyman is used as a mouthpiece for Brock (who isn't around much and isn't a good talker when he's here), I can't for the life of me see why they've used Heyman in the same role for C.M. Punk.
What for? Not only is Punk constantly available, but he's more than capable of speaking for himself.....in fact, possibly more capable than just about anyone else. Additionally, since Punk has been cast as the ultimate loner the past two years, it seems incongruous that Heyman is involved with Punk at all.
It's overkill. If they want to use Heyman to support performers who don't speak well, give him someone like Drew McIntyre

But not Punk; it's a waste.
Do you agree? Do you like the way they're using Paul Heyman? Is there someone other than C.M. Punk who can better utilize Heyman's services?