This thread applies to any video game, be it sport's game, strategy, First-person shooter or a RPG etc.
There's always been some kind of game that had you saying "man that game was absolutely awesome" or "that game absolutely sucked", but what is it that really makes the game so incredibly bad, what is it that makes it so incredibly awesome?
Is it the graphical design of it compared to it's time? is it the accuracy of the game based on a movie / a book etc. or what is it really?
RPG: To me, I think it has to have that storyline that keeps you coming back, the graphical aspect of a RPG is always a very important thing I believe, to properly enjoy the environment that the game has you play through, the thing's your allowed to do in the game, so that it's not just a hack and slash game where you talk to people for a quest, it has to have some depth, some side quests that allows you to do more than just the main storyline.
Sport: Hard one really, I've never really played many sports based games, but I've always enjoyed the Fifa football games, so I guess that's the description of a good sports game to me.
First-person shooter (action games) Yet again graphic comes into play, that and I think the wider the available weapons in the game is, the greater the game is in itself, which is why I have an insane love for Battlefield: Bad Company 2, and Call of Duty (Modern Warfare 1 & 2)
Strategy: I've always been a huge fan of Age of Empire, I think a strategy game, it needs a good storyline behind it, but it's not necessarily the thing that should keep you from playing it if it doesn't, I mainly think that the available size of an army is something that keeps me more and more interested the larger the army in it self is, which is a reason to why I love the Total War series, Age of Empire while it doesn't offer a large army, offers that great storyline series of historical events and the large range of buildings.
What do you think makes a great video game?
There's always been some kind of game that had you saying "man that game was absolutely awesome" or "that game absolutely sucked", but what is it that really makes the game so incredibly bad, what is it that makes it so incredibly awesome?
Is it the graphical design of it compared to it's time? is it the accuracy of the game based on a movie / a book etc. or what is it really?
RPG: To me, I think it has to have that storyline that keeps you coming back, the graphical aspect of a RPG is always a very important thing I believe, to properly enjoy the environment that the game has you play through, the thing's your allowed to do in the game, so that it's not just a hack and slash game where you talk to people for a quest, it has to have some depth, some side quests that allows you to do more than just the main storyline.
Sport: Hard one really, I've never really played many sports based games, but I've always enjoyed the Fifa football games, so I guess that's the description of a good sports game to me.
First-person shooter (action games) Yet again graphic comes into play, that and I think the wider the available weapons in the game is, the greater the game is in itself, which is why I have an insane love for Battlefield: Bad Company 2, and Call of Duty (Modern Warfare 1 & 2)
Strategy: I've always been a huge fan of Age of Empire, I think a strategy game, it needs a good storyline behind it, but it's not necessarily the thing that should keep you from playing it if it doesn't, I mainly think that the available size of an army is something that keeps me more and more interested the larger the army in it self is, which is a reason to why I love the Total War series, Age of Empire while it doesn't offer a large army, offers that great storyline series of historical events and the large range of buildings.
What do you think makes a great video game?