Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
The spoiler moratorium on this movie ended months ago.
Clearly that's what they were trying to go for. BUT, the thing is, they showed Batman in the ship, 4 seconds before detonation. Not to mention, the blast apparently had a 6 mile blast. He was...maybe a mile out to sea. Technically speaking, GGL and all the kids on that bridge would have been gone. The sea-side of Gotham...would have been gone. Even if Wayne had managed to get out of the plane, he was still RIGHT NEXT TO AN ATOMIC BOMB EXPLODING UP HIS ARSE.
I still love the movie, and I bought into the end just as well. But if you really think about it, the writer's didnt' do a whole lot to help suspend disbelief.
Still think Bane's death was the most anti-climatic exit for character.
Have you not seen war of the worlds?
Or equilibrium. That was a pretty anticlimactic battle.
What fucking exit in War of the Worlds? For real.
Well, not too much. If you disregard few things on that story(like why they didnt just kill all those cops and similar(even dont really like all those evil takeover of Gotham)), its quit good movie.I was just wondering, has anybody seen it since the original release, and changed their opinion on it?
No, but I am excited about finally seeing Skyfall tomorrow.
The Spielberg version? Elaborate.
True, I'm no fan of bane's exit either.At least the aliens got a death sequence. Bane got pinged across the room and forgotten about. So many hilarious 'deaths' in that film.
lee said:Or equilibrium. That was a pretty anticlimactic battle.