Philbrook37
Pre-Show Stalwart
i forgot when all wwes washed up talent came to tna to get fat
TNA Haters
- Thread starter gamehead
- Start date
- Status
Eternal Dragon
Monster
I think TNA has great wrestling, I like what I've seen so far in the X-divison but, I try to watch TNA Impact and I just get plain bored. I'm sorry, but I think TNA has a lot of potential if we give it a few more years- it's still fairly new. I'll always stick with WWE though, can't help that.
Flames Out
Dragon
Flames Out
Dragon
M
Myko
Guest
No, all of the WWEs underpushed wrestlers went to TNA to get real pushes that they deserved but in the WWE they don't see talent, they see only size. Altough nowadays TNA is a little iffy, they are planning on having Jarret vs. Sting at the next PPV, insiders reports, ferras ballout. Anyways, TNA is godly, don't oppose to TNA.
brownzrule31
Dark Match Jobber
y would we order a 2 hour ppv gamehead for 30 bucks wen u get a 3 hr ppv for 35 dumass and plus we will no who will win jeff jarret lik he alwayt does i mean i predict he will hold it another 12 times this year
First of all, the last TNA PPV was fifteen bucks, at least for me in the UK.
Secondly, we'll wait and see about Jeff Jarret winning the title. And if Jarret holds it 12 more times, he loses it at least 11 times, which would be quite interesting, no?
Lastly, I have little or no respect for someone who types as unintelligibly as yourself about somthing you know little or nothing about. The only dumbass in this thread is you.
Secondly, we'll wait and see about Jeff Jarret winning the title. And if Jarret holds it 12 more times, he loses it at least 11 times, which would be quite interesting, no?
Lastly, I have little or no respect for someone who types as unintelligibly as yourself about somthing you know little or nothing about. The only dumbass in this thread is you.
Cracker5000
Great Khali Mark
I watched TNA now and again for the past few months and it had great matches and some crappy ones. I only watch TNA if nothing is on the TV. Also that commentator sucks. I don't care how many awards he's got, he is just plain annoying. I prefer WWE because I can't be bothered seeing old WWE wrestlers who were much better in WWE than TNA. Like The New Age Outlaws or "The James Gang".
ShaneRamlall
Rated ''R'' Superstar
WOW.The TNA pay per views are not 2 hours.I saw slammiversary it was 3 hours long.Also have you ever seen The kotm match or ultimate X.have you ever seen X division stars and new and up comming stars of their own that WWE never had jus like Christoper Daniels,Aj styles and samoa joe who had the most amazing feuds.Six sided ring.They took everything WWE had and improved it or everything wrestling had and improved it.Six sided ring,Six sided cage match.Different matches like the reverse ladder match or ultimate X.They have gave pushes to superstars who deserve em while WWE sucks dick and give a push to whoever is great in size or what not.
Philbrook37
Pre-Show Stalwart
tna isnt bad but there not gonna last long..they dont have the funds
W
wwe's number 1 fan
Guest
Governmentuser85 said:
1. tna didnt even exist.
2. it was nwa.
X
xTripleHHHx
Guest
to say that TNA is gonna last is BS just cuz they dont travel doesnt mean anything. They have better matches talent and crowds than WWE and there in Universal studios every week with new vacationers so there budget will increase if anything
dude, wasn't the original D-X around before nWo black and silver????? and i don't remember 3 count bein cheerleaders..... just comin to the WWF lookin for a job. But dont get me wrong, i like TNA cause I love the James Gang and Team 3D. I just like the WWE more, and I hate when people knock on them
ShaneRamlall
Rated ''R'' Superstar
Yup while WWE fucks up TNA does better...Please dont ban me for saying fucks up....Im being careful even...The admins might banned me for saying fucks up...
D
Demolisher
Guest
^lol...TNA is great. It shows great wrestling...something the WWE hasn't done recently, and they came up with some of the most creative matches. Sure Jarrett may put the title on himself for long periods of time but he always drops it to someone worthy (IMO). if you've never seen a TNA, you have to watch one, and your opinion on the WWE will change.
X
xTripleHHHx
Guest
Demolisher said:
idc if he has it for a long time because he has established himself as the top heel of the business and once he loses we will feel so releaved
hahahaShaneRamlall said:
W
wrestlingtaker
Guest
gamehead said:
I'm a TNA hater and the only reason Im here is because the name of your thread is TNA Haters,so I thought it was meant for people that hate TNA. Anyways I watched TNA for a couple of weeks and it Sucks!!!! and why the hell would I spend money to look at Trash(meaning all the TNA wrestlers) and Im not poor cause I order Pay Per Views,but only WWEs.
wrestlingtaker said:
Looks like you like soap operas because thats what the WWE is these days. Maybe thats why you don't like TNA cause it's not "sports entertainment" or as I call it soap operas like the WWE. Maybe you don't like real wrestling and would rather be entertained with vampires or ******s(Eugene) plus much more bul$hit. Now you watch AJ Styles vs. Samoa Joe vs. Christopher Daniels match from the TNA Unbreakable 2005 and tell me that was not a great match. And this time you don't have to "waste maoney" as you say just download it to your computer. Watch the match and you'll be impressed. I have that match saved on my computer and I have to say that was the greatest TNA match I have seen yet and watch it very otfen.
Edit: Oh, if you don't watch that match then its true what I said that you TNA haters don't even give TNA a chance cause your SCARED that TNA will overpower the WWE in a few years!
W
wrestlingtaker
Guest
I watched the match and it SUCKED compared to all of The Undertakers matches. Sports Entertainment is not the reason I hate TNA. Its just all the small crappy wrestlers(aj styles,samoan guy)and I do like to watch real wrestling meaning the WWE.You say WWE is a soap Opera then TNA is a soap Opera that SUCKS and no one watches.
wrestlingtaker said:
OK, you say you saw the match right! Who won and how?
TNA is not a soap opera cause they don't have no fake drama like a lady that cheats on his boyfriend for his best friend or a monster family and mom killed in a fire and then him having to face have him from the pastcome a chokeslam him etc. You don't call that soap opera bucrap then you're just a WWE D!*k-Rider
W
wrestlingtaker
Guest
I was lieing. I wouldnt waste my time watchin Two dumb fucks just dancing around pretending to wrestle and the whole Kane thing is a storyline thats leads to WRESTLING you ******.You just have to accept that the WWE is better than "TNA" and What the hells your problem with Soap Operas?
wrestlingtaker said:
Nice counting its 3 people dumbass. And I know the WWE is better than TNA I'm just saying none of you WWE lovers give TNA a chance. I say just give TNA a chance you don't have to watch just one of them you know. I watch both. My problem with soap operas is that there boring (wwe is sometimes too) and way too dramtic (just like the WWE). And you say the storylines lead to wrestling, of caose it does but in TNA you don't need a storyline cause there not they just go shraight to wrestling
W
wrestlingtaker
Guest
Again I could care less about TNA,so I dont know who was "wrestling".I did give TNA a chance,but its just way too boring and useless.Thats another reason TNA Sucks cause theres no story behind their fight.Soap Operas are not boring dramatic Yes,but not boring and dont call me a dumbass you dumbass!
wrestlefan493
Dark Match Jobber
- Status
