ãã¥ã¼ãG.ãã¬ãã¯ã·ã§ã³
Only have NJ World now!
Alright I'm sure you're miffed by the title so allow me to explain. I've noticed this about TNA for a while now. What I and I'm sure many others enjoy about TNA over the past couple of years is that they have been booking long term with deeper storylines.
Fans being fans, we'll always tend to predict what happens, how TNA are going to go forward in their storylines. And it always seems that TNA leads us into thinking one thing will happen, and then changing direction. In some cases I think it has worked out for the better, in others not so much. I'm going to go ahead and cite the past couple of Bound For Glory storylines.
2011: What the consensus thought
Bobby Roode would win the BFG Series, defeat Kurt Angle and become the face of the comapny, and go on to feud with James Storm since we all knew a Beer Money split would be inevitable.
2011: What really happened
Roode would lose to Angle via a rollup with tights with Roode's arm under the ropes while Angle simultaneously held the ropes (can you think of an even screwier finish?). Storm would win the title from Angle in an upset, and Roode would be the one to turn heel and gain the belt in a great turn. And he would go on to be the longest reigning TNA champ.
So here I think TNA was much better off having Angle beat Roode, I can remember it being despised as awful booking at the time but it was the catalyst for Roode's "selfish generation" persona and we ended up having IMO TNA's greatest champion.
So let's move onto 2012
2012: What the consensus thought
After Roode defeating allcomers, James Storm would win the BFG Series and finally get his revenge on Roode a year prior and win the world title back in the process.
2012: What really happened
Roode would lose the title to Austin Aries at Destination X. Jeff Hardy of all people would win the BFG Series. Aries turned heel and lost to Hardy. Roode and Storm had a non-title street fight instead to end their feud.
Now this one I'm mixed on, while Aries dethroning Roode would be in the top TNA moments of all time, what followed wasn't all that great. Aries couldn't defend his belt since the Series was ongoing, and Hardy was pretty lackluster as the following world champion. Storm sadly would never venture into the main events again.
Now let's head to the present day.
2013: What the consensus thinks
AJ Styles, being banned from challenging for the world title until BFG 13 has undergone a complete gimmick change. Momentum is riding high with him and many think he will be the one to bring an end to Bully Ray and the Aces & Eights for good, at the exact time his stipulation runs out.
2013: What will really happen?
A lot of possibilities out there, most prevalent;could Bully drop the belt at Destination X? That would free him up to fight Hogan, IF Hogan will wrestle again that is.
So the question is would you rather have TNA be entertaining and give the fans what they want but be very predictable OR would you rather TNA try to be unpredictable, but risk not giving the fans exactly what they want? But with the possibility of maybe something even better?
Fans being fans, we'll always tend to predict what happens, how TNA are going to go forward in their storylines. And it always seems that TNA leads us into thinking one thing will happen, and then changing direction. In some cases I think it has worked out for the better, in others not so much. I'm going to go ahead and cite the past couple of Bound For Glory storylines.
2011: What the consensus thought
Bobby Roode would win the BFG Series, defeat Kurt Angle and become the face of the comapny, and go on to feud with James Storm since we all knew a Beer Money split would be inevitable.
2011: What really happened
Roode would lose to Angle via a rollup with tights with Roode's arm under the ropes while Angle simultaneously held the ropes (can you think of an even screwier finish?). Storm would win the title from Angle in an upset, and Roode would be the one to turn heel and gain the belt in a great turn. And he would go on to be the longest reigning TNA champ.
So here I think TNA was much better off having Angle beat Roode, I can remember it being despised as awful booking at the time but it was the catalyst for Roode's "selfish generation" persona and we ended up having IMO TNA's greatest champion.
So let's move onto 2012
2012: What the consensus thought
After Roode defeating allcomers, James Storm would win the BFG Series and finally get his revenge on Roode a year prior and win the world title back in the process.
2012: What really happened
Roode would lose the title to Austin Aries at Destination X. Jeff Hardy of all people would win the BFG Series. Aries turned heel and lost to Hardy. Roode and Storm had a non-title street fight instead to end their feud.
Now this one I'm mixed on, while Aries dethroning Roode would be in the top TNA moments of all time, what followed wasn't all that great. Aries couldn't defend his belt since the Series was ongoing, and Hardy was pretty lackluster as the following world champion. Storm sadly would never venture into the main events again.
Now let's head to the present day.
2013: What the consensus thinks
AJ Styles, being banned from challenging for the world title until BFG 13 has undergone a complete gimmick change. Momentum is riding high with him and many think he will be the one to bring an end to Bully Ray and the Aces & Eights for good, at the exact time his stipulation runs out.
2013: What will really happen?
A lot of possibilities out there, most prevalent;could Bully drop the belt at Destination X? That would free him up to fight Hogan, IF Hogan will wrestle again that is.
So the question is would you rather have TNA be entertaining and give the fans what they want but be very predictable OR would you rather TNA try to be unpredictable, but risk not giving the fans exactly what they want? But with the possibility of maybe something even better?