Aeon Mathix
Has Ascended
Smackdown Live and Raw have been their own entities for about 7 months now which isn't something new to the WWE world. I even grew up watching wrestling when they were separated back in 2002. Since it's been going on for a while I want to discuss the good and bad aspects of it and get everyone's take on it.
Pro's:
1. More wrestlers get a chance to shine. With guys like Finn Balor, Samoa Joe, the Shield, Kevin Owens, and soon Shinsuke Nakamura along with all of the previous main eventer's, it would have been a challenge trying to showcase them all on Raw. I realize Smackdown was always there, but for years it was never more than a pointless main event tag match with nothing ever happening on it of note. The brand split opens up slots in the main event on both shows with the new NXT talent coming up.
2. Variety. Probably the biggest one is the variety of wrestler's on both shows. Needing to watch both because one wrestler you like may be on Raw or Smackdown is a smart business decision and adds some excitement as a wrestling fan as you know there isn't a show you can miss.
3. More rest for the wrestlers (?). I put a question mark there because I don't have a ton of knowledge how the touring schedule works now, only an interview with one of the guys that said it's a nice break having Raw and smackdown tour separately rather than having every person be at every live event. That might not be true though, for all I know Smackdown AND Raw tour 5 nights a week just in different cities. I'm going with the latter but I could be wrong.
Con's
1. Repetitive matches. This is the biggest one for me. On Raw it has been nothing but Owens/Jericho vs Reigns/Rollins since around the summer. I don't even want to count all the matches they have had with each other as I would wonder why I never tuned Raw out. It just got so boring for me personally and it felt like creative was stalling all fall and in a limbo. I understand Balor being injured may have put a wrench in things, but how big of a wrench would that have been?
The same is true for Smackdown with AJ vs Ambrose and that god awful Ellsworth stuff. I was sick of watching all of that by around October.
2. More championships. I would have been perfectly fine with just two world titles and the Tag Team titles being on Smackdown along with the Women being exclusive to Raw. That would have been great. Having two separate divisions for each show when you can count the number of competitors on one hand is ridiculous. By this time next year I would wager 80 percent of the roster on both shows will be able to say they are a former champion.
My biggest gripes are the repetitive matches and amount of people that will be able to claim they were a champion soon. Becky Lynch and Alexa Bliss have held the Smackdown Women's Title and they are about 25 percent of the division already. Titles, although props should have some sort of value to them instead of being reduced to participation trophies.
What are everyone's thoughts on the brand split thus far? Do I have valid complaints or do you disagree?
Pro's:
1. More wrestlers get a chance to shine. With guys like Finn Balor, Samoa Joe, the Shield, Kevin Owens, and soon Shinsuke Nakamura along with all of the previous main eventer's, it would have been a challenge trying to showcase them all on Raw. I realize Smackdown was always there, but for years it was never more than a pointless main event tag match with nothing ever happening on it of note. The brand split opens up slots in the main event on both shows with the new NXT talent coming up.
2. Variety. Probably the biggest one is the variety of wrestler's on both shows. Needing to watch both because one wrestler you like may be on Raw or Smackdown is a smart business decision and adds some excitement as a wrestling fan as you know there isn't a show you can miss.
3. More rest for the wrestlers (?). I put a question mark there because I don't have a ton of knowledge how the touring schedule works now, only an interview with one of the guys that said it's a nice break having Raw and smackdown tour separately rather than having every person be at every live event. That might not be true though, for all I know Smackdown AND Raw tour 5 nights a week just in different cities. I'm going with the latter but I could be wrong.
Con's
1. Repetitive matches. This is the biggest one for me. On Raw it has been nothing but Owens/Jericho vs Reigns/Rollins since around the summer. I don't even want to count all the matches they have had with each other as I would wonder why I never tuned Raw out. It just got so boring for me personally and it felt like creative was stalling all fall and in a limbo. I understand Balor being injured may have put a wrench in things, but how big of a wrench would that have been?
The same is true for Smackdown with AJ vs Ambrose and that god awful Ellsworth stuff. I was sick of watching all of that by around October.
2. More championships. I would have been perfectly fine with just two world titles and the Tag Team titles being on Smackdown along with the Women being exclusive to Raw. That would have been great. Having two separate divisions for each show when you can count the number of competitors on one hand is ridiculous. By this time next year I would wager 80 percent of the roster on both shows will be able to say they are a former champion.
My biggest gripes are the repetitive matches and amount of people that will be able to claim they were a champion soon. Becky Lynch and Alexa Bliss have held the Smackdown Women's Title and they are about 25 percent of the division already. Titles, although props should have some sort of value to them instead of being reduced to participation trophies.
What are everyone's thoughts on the brand split thus far? Do I have valid complaints or do you disagree?