The Pointless Thread

[Angelica Haze]

His sn was orez. He came in here bitching and complaining about how he'd made this place what it was today and talking abnout how none of the regulars today meant anything. He also flamed a mod, all of this occuring in less than half an hour or so.

thats all well and good but my question still remains, where did the "flaming" occur if it was in this forum its unwarnable even if it was a mod. heck everyone gets their fair share of flaming back over at bq and as long as its in our version of this forum we dont ban them or even warn them

 

[klunderbunker]

I have no problems at all with people who helped build the forums at all. What I do have a problem with is people that claim that the regulars today do nothing. Yes the older generations did their parts but for the most part their gone now. They have no right to come in here and blast us for no reason at all.

 

[Mighty NorCal]

we just want to understand the specifics of how the place we built up and used to run, is currently running. and we are just trying to understand why zero was banned, since we wrote the rules we are trying to figure out what rules he broke. thats all

and this is the spam forum, who contributes in a spam forum anyhow?

Im talking about overall contributing to the forum. Not just coming into the spam zone to argue about a bunch of arbitrary shit. We have a section for people to figure out how the site runs, its called the rules thread. We tell all new posters to read it. Zero was banned for fliaming, baiting and having alts. which has been tirelessly explained over and over.

 

[klunderbunker]

thats all well and good but my question still remains, where did the "flaming" occur if it was in this forum its unwarnable even if it was a mod. heck everyone gets their fair share of flaming back over at bq and as long as its in our version of this forum we dont ban them or even warn them

The flaming as far as I remember took place in here, but it came after he posted in the wrong threads, which qualified as spamming. Then he went on a rant about how he made this place and the rules used to be different.

 

[Mighty NorCal]

thats all well and good but my question still remains, where did the "flaming" occur if it was in this forum its unwarnable even if it was a mod. heck everyone gets their fair share of flaming back over at bq and as long as its in our version of this forum we dont ban them or even warn them

It wasnt in a spam forum. it was in a non spam forum. flaming. infraction.

 

[Y 2 Jake]

I'll take a look at it, can somebody give me a link.

 

[The Amish Pornstar]

Like I mentioned earlier, Zero deserved his banning for making alternate accounts alone, so I have no pity for him. If anything he should of pm'd an admin and discussed about possibly having the ban lifted (do you guys do that?) instead of going about it in the way he did.

Which brings me to my question what is the timeline that someone who is banned can come back? A year? 5? Never? I am kinda curious to hear what the ruling on this is, since from what I can tell there is nothing to read that states it.

 

[The Amish Pornstar]

I'll take a look at it, can somebody give me a link.

It was in your complaint thread, I believe the last page, in your feedback section.

 

[klunderbunker]

Jake, this is the first page he shows up in this thread on. This isn't where he got his infraction at but I think that happens in between his first and last here. He's gone by about page 743

http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showthread.php?t=13405&page=739

 

[Angelica Haze]

I have no problems at all with people who helped build the forums at all. What I do have a problem with is people that claim that the regulars today do nothing. Yes the older generations did their parts but for the most part their gone now. They have no right to come in here and blast us for no reason at all.

thats fair enough i suppose, I can see you guys and gals getting annoyed when people say the erm i dont wanna call you guys nooblets, but we'll go with that, since i'm kinda at a loss for how else to address you guys (no disrespect) get accused of doing nothing. I don't quite understand the logic of banning someone for saying that

I couldn't find your rules thread (i didn't look hard either) but heres what i assume you are talking about with the "multiple accounts" (which i have two or three here to be honest. it was from my efed days and i had a second charachter, the account(s) are inactive now though but i do have more than one) I just coppied this from our rules thread at bq, since its a direct copy from the original wz rules

15. Gimmick accounts. Ok, we've had some clever and not so clever gimmick accounts here. The rule is, their existence is at the admins' / mods' discretion. If your gimmick is amusing, you'll probably get to stay. If your gimmick sucks, isn't funny, or is messing up thread, or is stirring up lots of drama, it will probably be banned.

if there has been an amended rule i appologize but this seems close enough

I just cant imagine a bit of complaining in the designated thread could be causing "alot of drama" the warnable/bannable kind at that (i will look back at the thread in a bit)

i'm just curious is all. so dont take this as anything but me trying to understand the reasonings behind things

 

[Angelica Haze]

It wasnt in a spam forum. it was in a non spam forum. flaming. infraction.

but shouldnt that be a warning and not a banning? if it was disregard my question

 

[Uncle Sam]

I seriously can't believe how you've all fucked this place to hell already.

Former trouble maker makes an alternate account with which he instantly makes trouble. Can't blame Monkey for thinking it was Wes.

 

[klunderbunker]

No offense taken whatsoever. I've seen you before and know you're hardly one to start up trouble. It wasn't so much that he was asking the wrong questions, he was asking them in the wrong place. We have a thread for new posters, and the complaint thread is just for infractions only, which is clearly stated.

 

[Y 2 Jake]

From what I've seen he's come here, acted like a dick, got banned. He didn't come here to talk about wrestling, he came to vent about how shit WZ is. Which he could have done on his own forum.

 

[Uncle Sam]

but shouldnt that be a warning and not a banning? if it was disregard my question

The main part was he came back, immediately started cussing swearing and bitching and flamed a mod. OK, it was the bar room. However, that in unison with the fact that he'd already been banned and had made an alternate account with which to supposedly bitch and moan about how he "built this place" is more than enough for an outright banning.

 

[Angelica Haze]

No offense taken whatsoever. I've seen you before and know you're hardly one to start up trouble. It wasn't so much that he was asking the wrong questions, he was asking them in the wrong place. We have a thread for new posters, and the complaint thread is just for infractions only, which is clearly stated.

oh, well that makes sense then, thats all i wanted to know, thanks

 

[Mighty NorCal]

but shouldnt that be a warning and not a banning? if it was disregard my question

It did. It was a series of things of that nature, all in a row. He wasnt using the thread for what is was designated for, then flamed, which in turn, was also simultaneously once again not using the thread for what its supposed to be used for. 3 infractions. banned.

 

[Angelica Haze]

The main part was he came back, immediately started cussing swearing and bitching and flamed a mod. OK, it was the bar room. However, that in unison with the fact that he'd already been banned and had made an alternate account with which to supposedly bitch and moan about how he "built this place" is more than enough for an outright banning.

you see i disagree, the forum in which it happens makes all the differences in the world

if he had made said thread in another area that was non spam, then yes warn him until he's at 100 percent warnings then jail or ban him, but thats really a moot point since the reasons behind his initial warnings (the complaints thread) have been explained

 

[Uncle Sam]

Well, alt. accounts is a perma-ban anyway, so everything else is irrelevant.

 

[Mighty NorCal]

Well, alt. accounts is a perma-ban anyway, so everything else is irrelevant.

true story

 

[Y 2 Jake]

As for the topic about how long does a perma ban last. 1 yr, 2yr, 5yr and so on. It's kinda permanent. There are a million wrestling forums around, why go back to one that banned you.

 

[The Amish Pornstar]

As for the topic about how long does a perma ban last. 1 yr, 2yr, 5yr and so on. It's kinda permanent. There are a million wrestling forums around, why go back to one that banned you.

You have matured and want to support something you believe in from the past is one example that comes to mind. There are many reasons why someone would want to go to a certain forum, even if they were banned from it, other then to cause problems. I know it is permanent, as of now, but is this something you guys might be willing to change and make it case by case? I mean don't people deserve second chances to prove themselves? I think so, that is why I mentioned it.

 

[C.M.]

They get plenty of chances before geting banned, it takes 3 infractions to ban them for a week & 5 infractions to ban them permanently. Thats enough chances IMO

 

[Mighty NorCal]

people should get 19 chances CM. You cold hearted fuck.

 

[Angelica Haze]

rules 14 and J are clear contradictions of each other a "gimmic account" is still a second or "multiple account"

might wanna have one of those amended or remove rule 14 all together if multiple accounts are not allowed at all [/just saying]