So Brett Farve isn't as good as Romo, last year?
Not statistically, but I do believe he threw the ball more.
What are you basing Romo being great off of.. stats? Just curious, what have those stats ever.. WON.. Romo?
20 games dumbass.
That is how you base overall play on the football field.
Eli Fucking Manning might be the worst fucking QB in the world, but hes getting a blow job right now because of that shiny ass fucking ring on his finger,
Completely beyond the point. Which is Romo is better. Why? Because he's the better overall QB.
This has nothing to do with rings, you cant base playoff wins in a who is the better QB arguement, because they are just a certain group of games.
while Romo is trying to play off his greatness through stats.
Duh.
That's one of the factors in basing who's the better player. Has nothing to do with how much you have won, Carson Palmer has so much potential it's ridiculous, hell he may be even better than Romo even though he hasn't won.
How are stats made dumbass? Aren't stats collected by a group of fucking games?
Game by game and then regular season and playoff statistics, you stupid fuck.
You want so badly to argue that players aren't made or broke by selective games, yet when your bitch QB has an outstanding statistical game, you want everyone to jump on his dick & praise his balls.
He's played many good games. Which is what makes him so good. Doesn't matter if it's the regular season or playoffs, he plays and preforms well.
We'll see how long Tony Homo can maintain being Dallas' starting QB without winning a playoff game.
Who gives a shit? You can still be a good QB and not win playoff games. It'll effect your legacy, not your talent.
Goddamn Will, are you really that fucking ******ed? Quit cybering 15 year old girls and get your pedo ass to a TV and watch some game films.
The fucker can break all the records in the world and go 16-0 for all I give a shit, if he fails them in the playoffs again, or 2 more times (tops) I bet hes replaced.
Why would he? He's a great player, look at that 16-0 record and great stats.
Thing is dumbasses like you don't know is, it wasn't all of Romo's fault that they lost those playoff games, he played very well in both and there were other factors.
1) In the Seattle game, let's say they make the FG, there is still 1:36 on the clock and they are only up by 3 I believe, you do know the Cowboys are notorious for blowing games inside two minutes right? So say the FG goes in, I highly doubt and was at the time sitting in my chair thinking, we need a TD or it's over. Because our D will blow it.
2) Giant's game. Special teams, bad coaching, dropped passes, horrible blocking assignments offensively were all the major keys as to why we lost that game. Not Romo.
Jones wants a CHAMPIONSHIP
No shit Sherlock, which is why he's doing the best he can to build this team.
Romo was that mystery piece he finally captured.
not a QB with great numbers.
This argument is about better QB's. Not championships.
I don't give a shit if you base something off of 16 games, 19 games, or the entire fucking start of preseason to the pro bowl.. without that ring, all he has is meaningless numbers that won't get him anywhere.
Then your a fucktard that shouldn't even consider yourself a football fan. Because how else are you going to judge who the better player is? You can't.
They were TWO PLAYOFF GAMES.. Good fucking shit Wes, go suck Romo's dick some more to gain whatever imaginary knowledge you have..
Exactly. 2 playoff games. You can't base how good a QB is/isn't good on 2 playoff games.
See: Peyton Manning pre 06 as an example.
but I'm telling you, 16-0 means SHIT without a fucking ring at the end. Want proof, go ask the Pats.
But yet the Pats are still coming into this season as the best team in the NFL.
16-0 means something Will. Trust me, it does.
I never said Romo sucked did I? I told you point blank the guy had great fucking stats.. but hes NOT a QB of the future,
This just goes to show your ignorance. The guy has had a year and a half, and has single handedly turn this team around and you want to see he isn't the QB of the future? Where would we be with some mid 1st rounder at QB now Will? Nowhere.
unless that team only wants their future to be from week fucking ONE to week seventeen!
The point isn't the team jackass.
Fucking christ Will, are you really that moronic?
The argument is who is the best/better/more talented QB. Not who's the best playoff QB or team.
Depends what you consider talent. Again, Romo's stats are there. Delhomme's leadership and overall quality of play blow Homo away.
You do realize Romo has been the leader of that team since he stepped on the field in week 6 of 06 right?
And overall quality of play?
By far the funniest shit I've ever read, you criticize Romo for not playing well, Delhomme hasn't played well in 2 years. Before Romo was even in the league.
I won't deny Delhomme having a bad season a year ago, and being injury prone for the previous two years. But you can't deny that Delhomme was on an incredible hot streak to start this recent year,
Doesn't matter anymore, that was years ago. Now is now.
and had injury NOT played into factor, he would've had quite possibly his best season yet.
Based on three games Will? You kill me with laughter.