1. If you could bring Kizarny back, would you? Why or Why not?
Yeah I'd bring him back, if for no other reason than I don't think he got a fair shake the first time around. Kizarny was devised by WWE creative ultimately, so any blame for the
weirdness of his character rests solely on them. Having said that, I think it still could've worked. It would've been much more difficult to get over in the PG era, but a heel persona would've worked wonders here. The performer (and character) looked very "out of place" with his good-natured, happy go lucky attitude upon his debut. Truthfully, it reminded me of why WWF was so terrible in the early 90's.
2. Did you enjoy this character? Why or Why not?
I didn't enjoy the character the way it was presented to the audience. However, I did appreciate the potential he could have gone in long term. As stated above, the "face Doink" type of persona didn't really lend itself well to the performer who played Kizarny. Doing a little bit of research, you can see that Nick Cvjetkovich traditionally plays much darker characters and has had success in these roles in other promotions. WWE could've benefited greatly from having a solid, non-cookie cutter heel on the roster. They made a mistake in going the other way.
3. What would you have had Kizarny do(feuds, alliances, titles, etc.)(I would've made him a deranged heel. I think making him the playful face was a mistake.)[/I][/B]
Kizarny's "heel turn" should've been in the vignettes leading up to his debut. The first one should've played out a lot like they all did... happy-go-lucky, strange carney speak, can't smile enough, etc. These promos should've then devolved into a more sinister approach... terrorizing kids and families at the carnival while incessently blathering carnival speak in varying tones and degrees. By the time his in-ring debut came along, the character could've become complete, along with a demeanor and moveset representative of the more sinister personality built up in the promos.
For feuds, I would've had Kizarny start out as a loner, letting him squash some lower card talent in his first couple matches, moving up to more competitive feuds in the mid-card. He'd be on the losing end (mostly DQ's, some count-outs, etc.) in IC or US title opportunities while his character continued to build. To see if he had what it took long-term, I'd then book him as a "shock" challenger for the WH or WWE title on TV and see which way the crowd went and how he performed at a higher level. Depending on the results, he'd either be a mid-card champion sooner rather than later or the outcome would essentially be the same as it was (a few more house shows, used when absolutely needed, then future endeavored).