Sexcellence of Sexecution
#SwerveKing
Dolph Ziggler is an interesting superstar. He's over with the crowd, clearly, and now that he has the Money in the Bank briefcase he's in line for a World Title. However, for most of his career he either got no mic time or had his manager Vickie Guerrero do most of his talking for him, as managers tend to do. He's cut a few promos on his own here and there, the latest of which was his promo on Chris Jericho last Monday, which people seemed to think was good for the most part.
I think this kind of shows how the art of the promo has been lost, and people seem to forget the basics when it comes to cutting an effective promo. With promos in wrestling, the general rule is to build your opponent up AS WELL as build yourself up. If you promote your opponent and they promote you, it promotes the match and feud.
Dolph Ziggler didn't do that with Chris Jericho. He said that since Jericho has returned he's sucked and won no matches. Even if that's true, you don't want to say that in a promo against the guy because now if you "beat him" all you've done is beat a guy who sucks and can't beat anybody anyways. However, if you lose, you've buried yourself because you made your opponent out to be weak, therefore a loss to him makes you look even weaker. It's a lose-lose situation.
I didn't make this thread just to pick on that one promo by Dolph Ziggler, he's not the only one to be guilty of doing this. CM Punk cut a promo on Del Rio building up to their match at Survivor Series last year in which he said Del Rio was "uninteresting". This does nothing to help build the match or the feud, all it does it make CM Punk seem "edgy" and put over that aspect of his character. I understand CM Punk is a guy who is supposed to cross lines and say outrageous things and that's fine, but you can do that in such as way as to still help put over your opponent and feud.
So what's your take on the examples I've pointed out here? Beyond that, do you think the art of cutting a good promo has been lost in the modern era? Or do you think the old rules regarding promos are somewhat passe in a time when the cat is so far out of the bag, so to speak, in terms of professional wrestling?
I think this kind of shows how the art of the promo has been lost, and people seem to forget the basics when it comes to cutting an effective promo. With promos in wrestling, the general rule is to build your opponent up AS WELL as build yourself up. If you promote your opponent and they promote you, it promotes the match and feud.
Dolph Ziggler didn't do that with Chris Jericho. He said that since Jericho has returned he's sucked and won no matches. Even if that's true, you don't want to say that in a promo against the guy because now if you "beat him" all you've done is beat a guy who sucks and can't beat anybody anyways. However, if you lose, you've buried yourself because you made your opponent out to be weak, therefore a loss to him makes you look even weaker. It's a lose-lose situation.
I didn't make this thread just to pick on that one promo by Dolph Ziggler, he's not the only one to be guilty of doing this. CM Punk cut a promo on Del Rio building up to their match at Survivor Series last year in which he said Del Rio was "uninteresting". This does nothing to help build the match or the feud, all it does it make CM Punk seem "edgy" and put over that aspect of his character. I understand CM Punk is a guy who is supposed to cross lines and say outrageous things and that's fine, but you can do that in such as way as to still help put over your opponent and feud.
So what's your take on the examples I've pointed out here? Beyond that, do you think the art of cutting a good promo has been lost in the modern era? Or do you think the old rules regarding promos are somewhat passe in a time when the cat is so far out of the bag, so to speak, in terms of professional wrestling?