Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
What I offer as a candidate.
Out of all the Candidates I have been here the longest. I have survived the Jake/Jonny regime, Enjoyed the IC/Shocky Regime and am liking the KB/Sly regime. I've been here through countless rule changes and updates and can/will enforce them.
I will drive discussion throughout the board not just whatever section I decide to mod (if elected). To further this end if it is needed I will clean up my section & Keep it clean and reward (rep) those people that do a good job.
I'll update this at a later time
S'all good man.Sorry, Milenko, I'd completely forgotten how long you'd been here. Ignore the comment in my post about being the longest tenured candidate.
I still think, out of three that posted, Crock would be best suited for running for our party.
This is truly a popularity contest, so not only is Crock capable of doing the job, but he has the most cred from what I have seen in my short amount of time on this forum. We need someone strong to go against the other two parties, and I think Crock is our man.
Honestly, it doesn't matter how nice you're going to be or how much time you'll be willing to spend, plenty of guys pop in once a day, take care of their business, with no regard for how friendly they're being. The guys that make stuff happen around here are the ones that do their job, no matter how little credit they get for it. Yes, I agree that you should want to improve your section, but how? How will you do it? All I'm seeing are a bunch of empty promises, the same shtick that everybody and their mother can peddle. I can tell you why I'll be good, but it's certainly not glamorous. I'll be a good moderator because I'll get the job done. How? I'll keep my section flowing well. I don't have to go out and make 6000 threads in an attempt to keep "discussion flowing," all I have to do is make sure people have something interesting and thought provoking to post in, to make it friendly to posters. In running to be the next wrestling mod, I truly feel I'm the guy who can do this, that I'm the one who can do a good job. I post on a high level very consistently and sure, I don't have 4000 posts, but I have quite a few, not that it indicates much. Plenty of people can spew off without any true meaning to what they say, at least I'll provoke some thought. I'll be a moderator that does his job, period.
People don't seem to understand that. Everybody can keep a section clean, that's not what it's all about. You have to be patient, you have to understand certain things. For example: Nick left a thread up and the OP was spam. Most would get rid of that right away, but he knew it would pick conversation up. You have to be able to pick out that difference. In my time here, I've learned that. I may not have a bold name, but I can still go into a section and understand what needs to be done.
Lastly, with my "declaration" against Coco, I clearly provide the closest thing to competition he has. He may be the most popular guy around, but I'll do my best to go step for step with him, no doubt about it.
Best of luck to all my fellow competitors.
How exactly is the promise to drive discussion empty? It is what it is. Look at your own words. How will you drive discussion? You'll keep your section flowing well. Well, that clarifies things. Actually, no it doesn't, it's as empty as you accuse driving discussion of being. Driving discussion is self explanatory. You post threads, respond to other threads, make sure the spam is taken care of. It's not an empty promise, it's a statement that explains itself. Driving discussion doesn't require some complicated playbook, it requires a mind that can create thoughtful posts and a will to do it on a regular basis.
Yes, spam deserves to be moved, but if the thread can serve a purpose, like actually asking a question, but maybe the post isn't up to standard (like this one) why not leave it up? It generated a solid amount of posts and kept people interested, it certainly didn't spam up the section. There's a huge difference, agreed.Leaving a spam thread up in the non spam sections? Was it just a spam post, or was it a spam post that had already generated many non spam replies? There's a huge difference. If a spam thread is made, it gets moved to spam. There's a reason we have that section. If a spam thread is made, gets overlooked, and winds up generating non spam posts, then the scenario is different.
"I'll drive discussion." That's empty, it tells me nothing. I said how I would do it, I would give people interesting things to post in, whether I post them or not. You don't even have to post all that many threads as a mod, not everybody has to be Jack-Hammer or IDR. Look at Nate, for example. He picks and chooses spots to post, he's not a posting fiend, not by any means. That's what's important -- picking and choosing your spots. Hell, Tastycles is another prime example. How often does he post now? Not much, at least in the non-spam sections... yet, KB and Sly have a great appreciation in what he does. Posting isn't everything.
Yes, spam deserves to be moved, but if the thread can serve a purpose, like actually asking a question, but maybe the post isn't up to standard (like this one) why not leave it up? It generated a solid amount of posts and kept people interested, it certainly didn't spam up the section. There's a huge difference, agreed.
It's not empty, it's a self explanatory statement. Driving discussion is a thing. It's like saying "I will walk to the store." I don't need to tell you how I'm going to move my feet alternately up and down utilizing frictional forces to propel myself forward. Walking explains itself, as much as driving discussion does.
Someone might post a thread about in TNA in the WWE sections. It'll drive discussion - why not leave it up? Because it belongs in a different section. The forum is ordered for a reason, and the divisions should be followed appropriately. Let spam threads drive discussion in the spam forums.
It is BEYOND empty. I'll drive discussion. There, I just said it. What does that mean? How will I do it? That one statement doesn't give anybody a thing.
It fit within the section, it was just "spammy." Simply put: It drove discussion and interest in the WWE section, no problem with that. You're not supposed to leave spam up, but in that case (still asking a valid question) then leave it up. Honestly, you can't toss everything into the spam sections, especially if it works.
Are you saying you would send it to spam, even if discussion was flowing perfectly, only because the OP wasn't that great? Laziness certainly shouldn't be rewarded, but it has to be looked at situation to situation.
If you generalize it all into one big thing, it'll hinder discussion more than anything.
what can I say other than what I have? No one's called me out on anything and the one point I wanted to make Harthan did a pretty good job withMilenko, you need to get in on this debate if you want a chance to be on staff. How can you talk so much about wanting to be a mod but not do shit about it when you get the chance?
Out of all the Candidates I have been here the longest.
No-one else in this party, perhaps no-one else in the election, is a former moderator. I am. This is beneficial for a multitude of reasons. It proves that I was once regarded well enough on all accounts to be a moderator of two sections - WWE and WZCW. It is the only concrete proof that can be offered of any candidate in this entire elections that I have the skills necessary to be a mod - because I was one.
Guys? Seriously?Sorry, Milenko, I'd completely forgotten how long you'd been here. Ignore the comment in my post about being the longest tenured candidate.
Guys? Seriously?
you weren't in the running at the timeGuys? Seriously?