For years we have witnessed highly talented wrestlers fail to get the recognition they probably deserved. Guys like Chris Jericho, He has had a amazing career so im not saying he was underutilized but he was never "THE MAN" so to speak even though he had all the credentials and attributes to make him the top guy. There has also been guys who get extremely hot with crowds and end up getting nowhere in particular, Guys like Paul Burchill who had a "Pirate" gimmick in the mid 00s that although was slightly ridiculous, it was over big time!...then he got released. Rumours about this persisted and the one that stood out was that he was getting bigger reactions than Bobby Lashley at the time and WWE were not prepared and didnt expect Paul to ever get the gimmick over so they sent him back to developmental...That leads me on to my next point....
Backstage Politics...We all know that in order to get anywhere in the working enviroment you have to kiss a little ass, Sad but true. For years we have heard the stories about HHH, Shawn Michaels, Hulk Hogan, Kevin Nash, Randy Orton ect all using their pull backstage to help maintain the spotlight.
So what im asking is......What determines if a "Superstar" is to be a long term player in the main event scene and what matters most...Your ability in the ring and on the mic or the friends you make backstage?
Granted it may be a little of both but lets discuss....
Backstage Politics...We all know that in order to get anywhere in the working enviroment you have to kiss a little ass, Sad but true. For years we have heard the stories about HHH, Shawn Michaels, Hulk Hogan, Kevin Nash, Randy Orton ect all using their pull backstage to help maintain the spotlight.
So what im asking is......What determines if a "Superstar" is to be a long term player in the main event scene and what matters most...Your ability in the ring and on the mic or the friends you make backstage?
Granted it may be a little of both but lets discuss....