Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Man, that gymnastics controversy sucks. I'd be pissed off if I was a British gymnast, and I'd be really pissed off if I were from the Ukraine. I guess it proves that reputation often supersedes justice.
Could be worse. Check out the women's fencing controversy that happened today. Reminiscent of the 1972 Men's Olympic basketball controversy. For those of you not up on American basketball history, you can check out this link.
http://basketball.about.com/od/internationalbasketball/a/Basketball-At-The-1972-Olympics.htm
I understand completely what you're saying. I'm just saying you should check out the fencing one, because it was really bad too.I don't really follow fencing, but gymnastics is huge in my household, both my kids are heavily involved in it. Seeing how hard they train, i can only imagine how astronomically harder the Olympic gymnasts must train. And to put in that much time and effort, and then reap the benefits, only to have them taken away due to politics and spineless officials, I think it's a real shame.
Archaic? I thought they were just put in this year?And that's not even to mention the archaic rules that are keeping Jordan Wieber from even having a shot at Olympic individual success.
Archaic? I thought they were just put in this year?
I don't follow gymnastics, that's just what I thought I heard.
It was the 2004 Olympics.My understanding of it is, years ago countries such as Russia or China were so dominant in gymnastics, that they instituted the rule restricting just two athletes per country in terms of vying for the individual overall accolades. Otherwise, the situation would arise whereby Russia, for example, would send a half dozen people into the medal round, leaving other countries with lesser representation. As I understand it, this rules dates back for years, but a lot of people in gymnastics circles think it is time for a change. Someone like Wieber, a tremendous talent, loses out because her country can only send their top two people. I stand to be corrected, but I think certain athletes from other countries, who scored lower than her, will advance into the medal round, while Wieber has to wait another four years (in terms of individual results, not team results). And at the advanced age of 21, she'll likely be past her prime at that point.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/five_rin...corated_gymnast_is_totally_indefensible_.htmlBecause of a rule, in place at the Olympics since 2004, that limits each country to only two competitors among the 24 competing in the all-around final. In Wiebers place will be the likes of Ashleigh Brennan from Australia, who finished nearly six points behind the reigning world champion.
It was the 2004 Olympics.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/five_rin...corated_gymnast_is_totally_indefensible_.html
Agree completely.Thanks for the info, I knew I had the basic gist of it correct, I just didn't know the origin of the rule. Perhaps archaic was the wrong word. But flawed and incorrect still fit the situation.
It's shameful to think that people who finished six full points behind someone who won't be moving on, get the opportunity to participate in the all round final. In a sport that distinguishes scores to the tenths and even hundredths of a point, six points is astronomical.
Барбоса;4037703 said:With the Tweet sent to Tom Daley yesterday, I can safely say that there are some truly horrible people that masquerade as sports fans.
Glad that ******** has been arrested
Also, we have our first gold medal. Hopefully, it's the first of many.