Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
As we all know, HBK and Taker had one of the greatest matches ever. My question is, will WWE try and recreate that great match? How would they improve the match? Also, if you think that it wont be recreated, who would HBK face, and who would Taker face?
That match was CLASSIC. They've fought twice in big matches. Shawn took the first, thanks to Kane. Taker took the last one. A tiebreaker would be great, but not at Mania.
The Undertaker should face someone that fans wouldn't know if he would win or not. There is only one person who could raise that question, CENA.
HBK's days are numbered so he should be in a match that he will win, but against an up & comer to give them a much needed rub to put them in a title picture. JOHN MORRISON.
They fought in 3 big matches before this past Wrestlemania. They wrestled to a draw at Ground Zero in Sept. 1997. HBK took the first Hell in a Cell at Bad Blood in 1997, and Shawn Michaels won the casket match in which he hurt his back at Royal Rumble 1998. I'd like to see Taker wrestle someone that you'd think might have a chance to stop the streak (new face of the company) and Shawn could face a younger guy who's coming to prominence.
Casual fans who hardly ever watch wrestling watch Wrestlemania and would be confused and disappointed if a legend lost to a no-name. As much as the IWC loves guys like Miz, Morrison, Kofi, etc... they are all sort of missing that "it" factor that makes the greats stand out. At any given period, there are always a group of guys who will probably disappear completely sooner or later that the IWC thinks should be pushed to the moon. Nobody outside of the wrestling bubble knows who those guys are. Having them defeat Undertaker or HBK at Mania is absolutely ridiculous. Shawn Michaels made himself famous and he lost almost all of his big matches. If they're so great, they'll do the same. Don't give wins to somebody in the hopes that it will make them big. Give wins to the guy who made himself big without your help. Those are the ones who go on to become top guys. Sadly, they are extremely rare these days.
Casual fans who hardly ever watch wrestling watch Wrestlemania and would be confused and disappointed if a legend lost to a no-name. As much as the IWC loves guys like Miz, Morrison, Kofi, etc... they are all sort of missing that "it" factor that makes the greats stand out. At any given period, there are always a group of guys who will probably disappear completely sooner or later that the IWC thinks should be pushed to the moon. Nobody outside of the wrestling bubble knows who those guys are. Having them defeat Undertaker or HBK at Mania is absolutely ridiculous. Shawn Michaels made himself famous and he lost almost all of his big matches. If they're so great, they'll do the same. Don't give wins to somebody in the hopes that it will make them big. Give wins to the guy who made himself big without your help. Those are the ones who go on to become top guys. Sadly, they are extremely rare these days.
Casual fans who hardly ever watch wrestling watch Wrestlemania and would be confused and disappointed if a legend lost to a no-name. As much as the IWC loves guys like Miz, Morrison, Kofi, etc... they are all sort of missing that "it" factor that makes the greats stand out. At any given period, there are always a group of guys who will probably disappear completely sooner or later that the IWC thinks should be pushed to the moon. Nobody outside of the wrestling bubble knows who those guys are. Having them defeat Undertaker or HBK at Mania is absolutely ridiculous. Shawn Michaels made himself famous and he lost almost all of his big matches. If they're so great, they'll do the same. Don't give wins to somebody in the hopes that it will make them big. Give wins to the guy who made himself big without your help. Those are the ones who go on to become top guys. Sadly, they are extremely rare these days.