Comparing HBK and Hogan's backstage pull is just ridiculous. Technically speaking Hogan almost had a right to be an self indulging prick. He was the mega-star, and a phenom in and out of the wrestling world. I think a lot of people that started watching the WWE in 98-99 don't comprehend the star power Hogan had. An argument can be made he is one of the most famous athletes of the last 50 years, and he was a marketing machine. On the other hand, Michaels was never a top draw like Hogan, ever. Its not debatle by any of you idiots, the casual fan nor the IWC can convince me he was ever "THE MAN". Bret was the man from 92' to 97' and that's that. Argue with me till' your blue in the face and i'll shut you down on all accounts. When and where HBK thought he had the right to start pretending he was star is beyond me, he was a spec compared to Hogan at the most. If the wrestling world would take off there rose coloured glasses they would see HBK was out of line. Bullshit aside, he should have been professional and respected the man that put wrestling on the global map. True that marks.