I just read the Russo interview over at tnawrestling.com and I was surprised by the amount of time that was dedicated in the interview to talk of Goldberg. It seemd ridiculous to give so much time to a guy not in the company. It was so overdone that it caused me to start questioning it all. They talked about the problems with Russo and Goldberg in the past, the possibility of him coming in, how would Russo feel about this, etc. etc. What was the point of all of this.
Russo also said in the interview that he had no beef with Goldberg and would be more than happy to work with him again. Was all this for any reason whatsoever. Is a Goldberg debut still in the cards for TNA. I personally don't see many great benefits in it, especially seeing as how we already got Kurt, but to be honest I never saw it coming. I had thought that the return of Russo and the debut of Kurt was the nail in the coffin for Goldberg as far as coming to TNA any time soon. But is this an indication of something going on. Its more likely that its nothing, but I just cant get my head around why they spent so much time discussion Goldberg in the interview.
And I know the Goldberg debate has been done to death on here and other TNA forums all over the net; so what I am asking here is whether anyone thinks there is more to this interview than meets the eye. I just found it unusual.
Russo also said in the interview that he had no beef with Goldberg and would be more than happy to work with him again. Was all this for any reason whatsoever. Is a Goldberg debut still in the cards for TNA. I personally don't see many great benefits in it, especially seeing as how we already got Kurt, but to be honest I never saw it coming. I had thought that the return of Russo and the debut of Kurt was the nail in the coffin for Goldberg as far as coming to TNA any time soon. But is this an indication of something going on. Its more likely that its nothing, but I just cant get my head around why they spent so much time discussion Goldberg in the interview.
And I know the Goldberg debate has been done to death on here and other TNA forums all over the net; so what I am asking here is whether anyone thinks there is more to this interview than meets the eye. I just found it unusual.