RESPECT: Owen Hart

Owen Hart Respect

  • Owen DOES get the respect he deserves!

  • Owen DOES NOT get the respect he deserves!

  • Owen DOESN'T deserve respect!


Results are only viewable after voting.
WOW, Sly, your absolutly amazing with some things you say. Did I even mention Simba Samba? LMFAO TOO FUNNY! Horowitz, & the Brawler have been around (Wrestling) before you were a shine in your daddy's eye. They had set the stage for all these wrestlers to get over in the wrestling world. Why shouldn't they get some recognition for the sacrifices they made for the wrestling world? I wouldn't put them into the greatest wrestlers of all time catagory (which you assume is what I mean), but I would put them in a catagory of wrestling contributors that made a difference in wrestling as a WHOLE. So I suppose adding Pete Rose to the hall of fame was more deserving than Owen? What facts have you proven? Besides your arrogant opinions. Beside putting words in my mouth that have no meaning. Except to you.

Seems to me that you believe everything you read from Vince to be gospel. From the good book. What facts have you given that Owen does NOT belong? All you have done is sit here and belittle people with you OPINIONS on what Owen deserves and doesn't deserve. Nothing more. Also, the statement of the Snitsky being built up like a Goldburg type scenerio was mention by the people here at WZ. Ask them why they said something so Ignorant. All I did was add my OPINION that they are on to something.

It also seems to me that when I make a valid point, your response is always along the lines of "Wow...complete ignorance." and you duck the question. Keep on doing what you do by trying to make everyone believe you opinions are absolte. I have mine and you have yours. The only difference is, mine will change if valid points (Not your arrogant opinions) are made to refute what I am feeling.
 
Horowitz, & the Brawler have been around (WreSo I suppose adding Pete Rose to the hall of fame was more deserving than Owen?stling) before you were a shine in your daddy's eye.
Doesn't mean they were any good.

They had set the stage for all these wrestlers to get over in the wrestling world. Why shouldn't they get some recognition for the sacrifices they made for the wrestling world?
Because they were completely replaceable. Anyone with wrestling training could do what they do. It's not like they were anything special, just jobbers. Guys that could be replaced by anyone.

To be a legend you have to be something special, you have to bring something that no one else did and have fans look back on your career and see it as something special, based on the work done throughout the career.

None of Barry Horowitz, Brooklyn Brawler or Owen Hart can claim such a thing. The most famous thing Owen Hart ever did was die in the ring and have memorable matches/feud with his brother. Otherwise, he was a midcarder.

I wouldn't put them into the greatest wrestlers of all time catagory (which you assume is what I mean), but I would put them in a catagory of wrestling contributors that made a difference in wrestling as a WHOLE.
:lmao:

What does Pete Rose have to do with Owen Hart being a legend? Just because Pete Rose is in the WWE Hall of Fame doesn't mean that Owen Hart should be. You will be hard pressed to find many wrestling fans who think Pete Rose is in the Hall of Fame because of his contribution to wrestling.

That is a terrible argument. We're not discussing who should be in the WWE Hall of Fame. We're discussing the legacy of Owen Hart.

What facts have you proven?
What facts do you want?

Besides your arrogant opinions. Beside putting words in my mouth that have no meaning. Except to you.
:rolleyes:

Seems to me that you believe everything you read from Vince to be gospel.
What makes you think that?

What facts have you given that Owen does NOT belong?
He wasn't a major draw. He had nothing memorable about his career other than a ready-made feud with his brother that STILL couldn't get the fans to buy into him as a legitimate main-eventer, even with a clean victory over Bret at Wrestlemania, the same Bret Hart who would walk out of WM 10 the WWF Champion. Outside of his feud/matches with Bret, Owen never did anything of any real significance.

Please point to me SOMETHING Owen did that would put him alongside the contributions of someone like his brother Bret, or Flair, or Savage, or Hogan, or Austin, or Warrior, or Bruno, or Backlund, or Brody, or Hansen, or Vader, or Sting, or Piper, or Rock or...anyone who is an actual legend. What has Owen ever done to be considered alongside those guys?

All you have done is sit here and belittle people with you OPINIONS on what Owen deserves and doesn't deserve. Nothing more. Also, the statement of the Snitsky being built up like a Goldburg type scenerio was mention by the people here at WZ. Ask them why they said something so Ignorant. All I did was add my OPINION that they are on to something.
Who are "the people here at WZ"? I'll be more than happy to ask them why they would say something so foolish.

It also seems to me that when I make a valid point, your response is always along the lines of "Wow...complete ignorance." and you duck the question.
If you would make a valid point, then maybe this statement would hold water.

I mean, your claim thus far is that Owen Hart is a legend, because Barry Horowitz and Brooklyn Brawler are legends and that Pete Rose is in the WWE Hall of Fame. There have been plenty of wrestlers with solid in-ring ability that never got over big that are not considered a legend

You have YET to detail anything Owen EVER did that makes him a legend.

Keep on doing what you do by trying to make everyone believe you opinions are absolte. I have mine and you have yours. The only difference is, mine will change if valid points (Not your arrogant opinions) are made to refute what I am feeling.
My arrogant opinions? What exactly makes my opinions arrogant? How are my opinions arrogant?

My opinions are hard and unyielding, that much is true. But, good God, there has not yet been one person who can tell me why Owen Hart (or Barry Horowitz or Brooklyn Brawler :rolleyes:) deserves to be mentioned alongside those men who actually changed the wrestling world. Those who were the reason fans came and paid their money to the show. Those guys who left everlasting memories among the majority of the wrestling fans.

The only memories that most wrestling fans can claim of Owen is his feud with Bret and dying in the ring. Hardly legendary.
 
Let's see, Owen had probably the best run of all of the King of the Ring's until Kurt Angle came along and ran with it, and later Booker T.

The Two Time Slammy Award winning King Of Harts was pretty damn funny as well. The guy had promo skills better then his brothers, and his in ring work is top notch. He had a great feud with Shawn Michaels that the WWE liked so much now that they rehashed it with Randy Orton concussing Michaels.

Owen did everything for the company, including rehashing a stupid gimmick which did lead to his death. IF anything, the respect of his peers is what counts the most, and most of his peers said that the guy was top notch, in the ring and out of the ring.

Owen deserves in the Hall of Fame easily. Every match he was in on pay per view was solid. Hell, he even made Ken Shamrock look watchable. Hell, if anything, Owen legitimized Bret as a champion. This was Hart's first real big feud as champion, and Owen pushed Bret to another level. Hell, Owen's character in 1997 made Steve Austin look weak. Owen came across as a more formidable opponent to Austin the Bret ever did, same with Michaels. Owen was the more violent aggressive of the two.
 
Hey guys...I'm Back!
Thanks for the great response! I'm thinking of putting more RESPECT threads up later. And this fued between Slyfox696 and Ogerz could go down as the greatest fued in the HISTORY of wrestling!
But that is neither here nor there.

I just got a Quote from WRESTLEZONE.COM:
Jericho told the outlet that if he could be any wrestler for one day it would be Stacy Keibler just so he could see what it would be like to have a butt like that. He said that the one wrestler that he wishes he could have wrestled was Owen Hart. Jericho was asked who was a wrestler that he admired as a kid but didn't like as an adult, but he refused to answer.

Does that change anyones opinion, do nothing, or are you all the same?
And to add one more question, do you think his wife is WRONG for not allowing his name to be used, in anyway(if WWE would even use it)?

I for one, thinks it helps the case of Owen not getting enough respect. I really wish his wife(who i think is wrong, but i can NOT and will NOT fault her) would allow WWE to give him the H.O.F, put him in the games, and put out a DVD on his great career!
 
Let's see, Owen had probably the best run of all of the King of the Ring's until Kurt Angle came along and ran with it, and later Booker T.
Except that both Austin's and HHH's did more for their careers than Owens did for his.

The Two Time Slammy Award winning King Of Harts was pretty damn funny as well. The guy had promo skills better then his brothers, and his in ring work is top notch. He had a great feud with Shawn Michaels that the WWE liked so much now that they rehashed it with Randy Orton concussing Michaels.
Owen's promo skills were not better than Brets. Owen had a high pitched voice which did not translate well through a mic. He did not have that more fearsome lower pitched voice, and there were plenty of times where Owen Hart would get completely lost in a promo.

And, his in-ring work is solid, but you can say that about a lot of wrestlers over the years.

Owen did everything for the company, including rehashing a stupid gimmick which did lead to his death. IF anything, the respect of his peers is what counts the most, and most of his peers said that the guy was top notch, in the ring and out of the ring.
What do I care what his co-workers said about him? At least, with regards to being a legend?

The guy was a good guy, a consummate professional and good in the ring. You won't hear any arguments from me on that. But, a legend? Not hardly. A guy who was never a draw, nor a world champion is going to have a REAL hard time being considered a legend. Steve Austin is a legend. Owen Hart is not.

Hell, if anything, Owen legitimized Bret as a champion. This was Hart's first real big feud as champion, and Owen pushed Bret to another level. Hell, Owen's character in 1997 made Steve Austin look weak. Owen came across as a more formidable opponent to Austin the Bret ever did, same with Michaels. Owen was the more violent aggressive of the two.
Umm...what?

How did Owen legitimize Bret's reign? By beating him clean in the middle of the ring a couple hours before Bret gained his second run? And, looking back, why would making Steve Austin look weak be a good thing?

People can think what they want, but anyone who consideres Owen Hart a legend must have easy standards to be regarded as such.
 
I think it really doesnt matter what Martha Hart wants because Owen did a lot for the wwe and deserves to be inducted into the Hall of Fame. She acts like its gonna kill her if they inducte him into the hall of fame its a once in a lifetime thing or if they pay tribute to Owen on the aniversry of his death there just celebrating the life of one of there dear friends that have passed on. Owen deserves respect. R.I.P Owen Hart . He was one of a kind.
 
Doesn't mean they were any good.

Because they were completely replaceable. Anyone with wrestling training could do what they do. It's not like they were anything special, just jobbers. Guys that could be replaced by anyone.

To be a legend you have to be something special, you have to bring something that no one else did and have fans look back on your career and see it as something special, based on the work done throughout the career.

None of Barry Horowitz, Brooklyn Brawler or Owen Hart can claim such a thing. The most famous thing Owen Hart ever did was die in the ring and have memorable matches/feud with his brother. Otherwise, he was a midcarder.

:lmao:

What does Pete Rose have to do with Owen Hart being a legend? Just because Pete Rose is in the WWE Hall of Fame doesn't mean that Owen Hart should be. You will be hard pressed to find many wrestling fans who think Pete Rose is in the Hall of Fame because of his contribution to wrestling.

That is a terrible argument. We're not discussing who should be in the WWE Hall of Fame. We're discussing the legacy of Owen Hart.


What facts do you want?

:rolleyes:

What makes you think that?

He wasn't a major draw. He had nothing memorable about his career other than a ready-made feud with his brother that STILL couldn't get the fans to buy into him as a legitimate main-eventer, even with a clean victory over Bret at Wrestlemania, the same Bret Hart who would walk out of WM 10 the WWF Champion. Outside of his feud/matches with Bret, Owen never did anything of any real significance.

Please point to me SOMETHING Owen did that would put him alongside the contributions of someone like his brother Bret, or Flair, or Savage, or Hogan, or Austin, or Warrior, or Bruno, or Backlund, or Brody, or Hansen, or Vader, or Sting, or Piper, or Rock or...anyone who is an actual legend. What has Owen ever done to be considered alongside those guys?

Who are "the people here at WZ"? I'll be more than happy to ask them why they would say something so foolish.

If you would make a valid point, then maybe this statement would hold water.

I mean, your claim thus far is that Owen Hart is a legend, because Barry Horowitz and Brooklyn Brawler are legends and that Pete Rose is in the WWE Hall of Fame. There have been plenty of wrestlers with solid in-ring ability that never got over big that are not considered a legend

You have YET to detail anything Owen EVER did that makes him a legend.

My arrogant opinions? What exactly makes my opinions arrogant? How are my opinions arrogant?

My opinions are hard and unyielding, that much is true. But, good God, there has not yet been one person who can tell me why Owen Hart (or Barry Horowitz or Brooklyn Brawler :rolleyes:) deserves to be mentioned alongside those men who actually changed the wrestling world. Those who were the reason fans came and paid their money to the show. Those guys who left everlasting memories among the majority of the wrestling fans.

The only memories that most wrestling fans can claim of Owen is his feud with Bret and dying in the ring. Hardly legendary.

Here your trashing me for saying that Horowitz and Brawler were major contributors to wrestling, yet you add VADER :blink: to a legend list? LMFAO OMG, that proves how insane you truly are! Vader was prominent in WCW and did JACK AND SHIT in the WWE. Please. That just proves that your ego can't handle the truth or VALID points.

And NO, Not anyone with wrestling training could do what Horowitz or Brawler did for wrestling as a whole. IF, that was the case, then why is it that ALL the jobbers of any era are not still around or when you mention their name people shrug their shoulders. Mention Horowitz or Brawler to anyone, they WILL recognize them. PERIOD. Did they accomplish anything? YES. They helped people get over in wrestling when they were NOTHING. Like the ROCK. Brawler was The Rock's first opponent. When I first saw the rock with that STUPID OUTFIT, I laughed. But the Brawler put him over as a great wrestler and that was the bottomline.

These two people gave their lives to helping new talent get over with their in ring abilities (Which they had alot of whether or not you want to admit to it, WHICH, I know you wont). Your arrogant because you can't see the importance of these two and their contributions to the wrestling world as a WHOLE. Your see it Slyfox's way or NO WAY. Hence, ARROGANCE.

Owen was a draw. You don't like him. Thats fine. Opinions are is like buttholes, everyones got em. But OPINIONS are just that, Opinions. You think VADER belongs in the LEGEND catagory, and I am sure you will come back with something snappy or a nice belittling comment, but bottomline is, HE contributed LESS to wrestling and accomplished LESS than Owen did. Vader may have been WCW champ, But Owen was Champion (Europeon, IC, Tag Team, Stampede and so on) SERVERAL TIMES so OWENS credibility of not only deserving more RESPECT, but a bid at the HOF is warrented.

The very defintion of a LEGEND is someone that made a different and an IMPACT on wrestling. NOT JUST ACCOMPLISHMENTS. Look at the HOF. They have William Perry (No Titles), Jim Ross (Great announcer, but what titles did he hold? After all, It was YOU that compare who should and should not be in the hall of fame by how many titles they held and by people spending money to see them or "DRAW" as you arrogantly put it.), Mean Gene Okerlund (Once again, NO TITLE, but great interviewer), & George "The Animal" Steele (Fine example PROVING my theory of Horowitz and Brawler). Did anyone pay money JUST to come see ANY OF THESE GUYS? ANYONE being inducted into the HOF makes them a Legend According to the WWE. All of these guys have done NOTHING more than make a HUGE contribution to the WRESTLING WORLD AS A WHOLE. Theres some FACTS for you. (Insert bashing or question avoiding here)

By Ryan Clark:
Despite the crowd's apathy towards Gene Snitsky matches, Vince McMahon continues to support the bacne-ridden, yellow-toothed grappler. McMahon is a big fan of Snitsky, which explains his never-ending dominance over mid-carders and low-end wrestlers on Raw and Heat. There doesn't appear to be any end in sight in regards to Snitsky's mini-push, and thus he will continue to dominate talent in short squash matches in Goldberg-like fashion until they come up with a program for him. Although, while the Snitsky push has been going on for nine months (and counting), he still has yet to engage in a program that has lasted more than two weeks, or wrestle at a pay-per-view event for that matter.

Which also should PROVE what I am saying about him. (Insert snappy comback or belittling comment here) Say what you will, Bottomline is your a VERY ARROGANT person that believes you could NEVER be wrong. If you don't know what arrogance is, Go get the book written by me, How to know your ARROGANT for DUMMIES. PEACE.
 
Here your trashing me for saying that Horowitz and Brawler were major contributors to wrestling, yet you add VADER :blink: to a legend list? LMFAO OMG, that proves how insane you truly are! Vader was prominent in WCW and did JACK AND SHIT in the WWE. Please. That just proves that your ego can't handle the truth or VALID points.
Yes, because wrestling only exists in the United States. :rolleyes:

And NO, Not anyone with wrestling training could do what Horowitz or Brawler did for wrestling as a whole. IF, that was the case, then why is it that ALL the jobbers of any era are not still around or when you mention their name people shrug their shoulders. Mention Horowitz or Brawler to anyone, they WILL recognize them. PERIOD. Did they accomplish anything? YES. They helped people get over in wrestling when they were NOTHING. Like the ROCK. Brawler was The Rock's first opponent. When I first saw the rock with that STUPID OUTFIT, I laughed. But the Brawler put him over as a great wrestler and that was the bottomline.
So, then, Val Venis, Funaki, and Scotty 2 Hottie are all legends as well then, correct?

These two people gave their lives to helping new talent get over with their in ring abilities (Which they had alot of whether or not you want to admit to it, WHICH, I know you wont). Your arrogant because you can't see the importance of these two and their contributions to the wrestling world as a WHOLE. Your see it Slyfox's way or NO WAY. Hence, ARROGANCE.
Do you know what the word "arrogant" means?

Owen was a draw.
No, he wasn't.

You don't like him.
I already said I did. Twice in fact. Surely you could understand that by now.

Thats fine. Opinions are is like buttholes, everyones got em. But OPINIONS are just that, Opinions. You think VADER belongs in the LEGEND catagory, and I am sure you will come back with something snappy or a nice belittling comment, but bottomline is, HE contributed LESS to wrestling and accomplished LESS than Owen did. Vader may have been WCW champ, But Owen was Champion (Europeon, IC, Tag Team, Stampede and so on) SERVERAL TIMES so OWENS credibility of not only deserving more RESPECT, but a bid at the HOF is warrented.
Vader was one of the biggest gaijin in Japan, putting on legendary matches, earning the respect of Japanese wrestling fans every where. He was a major draw both in the United States and Japan, as well as putting on several high quality and memorable matches.

Owen Hart is remembered for breaking Steve Austin's neck and falling and breaking his own neck.

The very defintion of a LEGEND is someone that made a different and an IMPACT on wrestling. NOT JUST ACCOMPLISHMENTS.
Then, how can you consider Owen a legend? What impact did he have on the business?

Look at the HOF. They have William Perry (No Titles), Jim Ross (Great announcer, but what titles did he hold? After all, It was YOU that compare who should and should not be in the hall of fame by how many titles they held and by people spending money to see them or "DRAW" as you arrogantly put it.), Mean Gene Okerlund (Once again, NO TITLE, but great interviewer), & George "The Animal" Steele (Fine example PROVING my theory of Horowitz and Brawler). Did anyone pay money JUST to come see ANY OF THESE GUYS? ANYONE being inducted into the HOF makes them a Legend According to the WWE. All of these guys have done NOTHING more than make a HUGE contribution to the WRESTLING WORLD AS A WHOLE. Theres some FACTS for you. (Insert bashing or question avoiding here)
I thought we already discussed the fact that the WWE Hall of Fame has little to do with credibility as wrestling legends. Remember how you brought up Pete Rose?

I'm talking about a WRESTLING legend, not a WWE Hall of Famer, which, we can all agree is just as much political and money driven as it is respect.

By Ryan Clark:
Despite the crowd's apathy towards Gene Snitsky matches, Vince McMahon continues to support the bacne-ridden, yellow-toothed grappler. McMahon is a big fan of Snitsky, which explains his never-ending dominance over mid-carders and low-end wrestlers on Raw and Heat. There doesn't appear to be any end in sight in regards to Snitsky's mini-push, and thus he will continue to dominate talent in short squash matches in Goldberg-like fashion until they come up with a program for him. Although, while the Snitsky push has been going on for nine months (and counting), he still has yet to engage in a program that has lasted more than two weeks, or wrestle at a pay-per-view event for that matter.
HAHAHAHAHAHA :lmao:

You're quoting Ryan Clark? HAHAHAHA

Who the fuck is Ryan Clark, other than a biased reporter for WZ, who steals information from PWInsider and Wrestling Observer without giving proper credit, while altering original reports so their meaning changes to suit his needs?

Hahaha, you're quoting Ryan Clark as the source for your opinion. Astounding.


Also, I would like to point out, Clark said nothing about making Snitsky into the next Goldberg. Rather, he said the matches were short squashes like Goldberg's used to be. So, you're still wrong.

Which also should PROVE what I am saying about him. (Insert snappy comback or belittling comment here) Say what you will, Bottomline is your a VERY ARROGANT person that believes you could NEVER be wrong. If you don't know what arrogance is, Go get the book written by me, How to know your ARROGANT for DUMMIES. PEACE.
For your sake, and the sake of this thread, I'm asking you to quit your needless flaming.


And, again, I am going to ask you the question you've been avoiding for a while now.

What did Owen Hart ever do to warrant being a legend? What "IMPACT" did Owen have on the business, other than be friends with his fellow wrestlers? Hogan led wrestling through two boom periods. Austin redefined face/heel disposition. Piper was the mega heel to Hogan's mega face, the foil which made Hulkamania. Andre was the greatest wrestling attraction ever, loved by fans all over the world. The Ultimate Warrior was adored by fans all over, one of the most over wrestlers ever. Sting literally carried WCW for years, and was apart of one of the biggest drawing feuds of all time. Bret Hart carried the WWF on his back for years, providing a basis for successful technical wrestling in the United States. Bruno Sammartino carried the WWWF title for 7 years, selling out every arena he was, selling out MSG 60+ times. Antonio Inoki was the biggest draw Japan has ever seen, and has influenced Japanese wrestling his entire life. Bruiser Brody was one of the biggest draws in the world, known for his crazy brawling style, leaving fans wondering just how fake wrestling really was.


What is Owen Hart's claim to fame? What did he do to ever impact the wrestling business? He wasn't a major draw, he had only two memorable matches, both with his brother. He was never a consistent main-eventer, was never trusted to hold the World title, had below average microphone skills, and toiled in the midcard for most of his career.

How is Owen Hart a legend?
 
I loved Owen! From his first run as the Blue Blazer which gave him a Wrestlemania match against Mr. Perfect in WM5. I loved Owen! He was a high flyer and that set him apart from his brother Bret in later years when he came back to the WWF as himself. Whether he was in singles action or part of a group he gave it his all. He loved this business and he loved the WWF. He chose to stay when everyone else arouns him left. He had his own light! Bret leaving must have been hard on him but at the same time gave him his own time and he came into his own!

Marth Hart is the most selfish human being I know of on this planet! I know she lost her husband! Vince paid for everything when it came to Owen's funeral! After all he did for Owen in and out of the ring Marth went to the courts! I believe that she tarnished Owen's soul when she took Vince to court. Owen made the choice to do the stunt which had been done by Sting in WCW many times before! It wasn't like this was a first time stunt and was so dangerous! Sting had been doing it for 3 years by that time and had never had a problem! Owen decided to do it because it was good for his character and for business. Marth and Bret should have respected Owen's decision and honored his life instead of dragging this through court and saying aweful things about the business and the company that Owen hart loved so much!

Owen is a legend and in my hart will always be!
 
Yeah if Owen didn't want to do the stunt he wouldn't do it. But he did it to help the company and thats something. Having someone die in the WWE is really mean something in the wwe. Bret and Marth should of told Owen not to do it if she really didn't want him to die. Everyone even in the wwe should respect OWEN HART!
 
Yes, because wrestling only exists in the United States.

OK, Then why count what Vader did in JAPAN? OH THATS RIGHT, Its ok for the egomaniac, & arrogant Slyfox to add another country, But not for anyone else. :lmao:

So, then, Val Venis, Funaki, and Scotty 2 Hottie are all legends as well then, correct?

No. They have not been around for DECADES being supporting cast. Val Venis was the IC champ so I wouldn't consider him an absolute waste.

Do you know what the word "arrogant" means?

Just looked it up and it has your picture next to it. For your reading pleasure, here is the DEFINITION of ARROGANCE:an attitude of superiority manifested in an overbearing manner. Which is EXACTLY WHAT YOUR DOING. Your thinking that Your OPINION, is SUPERIOR to mine. I am NOT saying mine is more superior, I am saying that this is MY OPINION. Your the one attacking my opinion asking for FACTS when this entire thread is about OPINION.

I already said I did. Twice in fact. Surely you could understand that by now.

If you did like him, then you would have some amount of RESPECT for his carisma and in-ring abilities not to mention his accomplishments, to realize that he DESERVES BETTER.

Vader was one of the biggest gaijin in Japan, putting on legendary matches, earning the respect of Japanese wrestling fans every where. He was a major draw both in the United States and Japan, as well as putting on several high quality and memorable matches.

JAPAN does NOT EXSIST in the wrestling world. REMEMBER?
Yes, because wrestling only exists in the United States.

Owen Hart is remembered for breaking Steve Austin's neck and falling and breaking his own neck.

To me, and once again, this is where you and me differ cause this is my opinion and I am not trying to FORCE IT on to someone or BELITTLE someone else's opinion. I remember him for being a 2 time IC champ, European Champion, 4 time Tag team Champion, & WWE KING of the RING. All of which to ME, Means he DESERVES to be recognized by more than falling to his death as you so elequently put it. Oh, And breaking Austins neck.

Then, how can you consider Owen a legend? What impact did he have on the business?

See answer above. It says it all to me. Which most will agree.

I thought we already discussed the fact that the WWE Hall of Fame has little to do with credibility as wrestling legends. Remember how you brought up Pete Rose?

No, You discussed it with yourself. :blink:

I'm talking about a WRESTLING legend, not a WWE Hall of Famer, which, we can all agree is just as much political and money driven as it is respect.

Legends are the same way. Wake up and smell the shit your shoveling.

HAHAHAHAHAHA

You're quoting Ryan Clark? HAHAHAHA

Who the fuck is Ryan Clark, other than a biased reporter for WZ, who steals information from PWInsider and Wrestling Observer without giving proper credit, while altering original reports so their meaning changes to suit his needs?

Hahaha, you're quoting Ryan Clark as the source for your opinion. Astounding.

He gave his OPINION, and I personally see that he IS on to something. WAIT! Here is EXACTLY what I am talking about. Fine example of how you BELITTLE peoples OPINIONS. Worthless. :rolleyes:

Also, I would like to point out, Clark said nothing about making Snitsky into the next Goldberg. Rather, he said the matches were short squashes like Goldberg's used to be. So, you're still wrong.

Niether did I. I said they were building him LIKE a Goldburg type character. I never said he was the NEXT Goldburg. :rolleyes:

For your sake, and the sake of this thread, I'm asking you to quit your needless flaming.

LMFAO. If that isn't the pot calling the kettle black! You can dish it out yet you can't take it? The doors over there Alice.

And, again, I am going to ask you the question you've been avoiding for a while now.

What did Owen Hart ever do to warrant being a legend? What "IMPACT" did Owen have on the business, other than be friends with his fellow wrestlers? Hogan led wrestling through two boom periods. Austin redefined face/heel disposition. Piper was the mega heel to Hogan's mega face, the foil which made Hulkamania. Andre was the greatest wrestling attraction ever, loved by fans all over the world. The Ultimate Warrior was adored by fans all over, one of the most over wrestlers ever. Sting literally carried WCW for years, and was apart of one of the biggest drawing feuds of all time. Bret Hart carried the WWF on his back for years, providing a basis for successful technical wrestling in the United States. Bruno Sammartino carried the WWWF title for 7 years, selling out every arena he was, selling out MSG 60+ times. Antonio Inoki was the biggest draw Japan has ever seen, and has influenced Japanese wrestling his entire life. Bruiser Brody was one of the biggest draws in the world, known for his crazy brawling style, leaving fans wondering just how fake wrestling really was.


What is Owen Hart's claim to fame? What did he do to ever impact the wrestling business? He wasn't a major draw, he had only two memorable matches, both with his brother. He was never a consistent main-eventer, was never trusted to hold the World title, had below average microphone skills, and toiled in the midcard for most of his career.

How is Owen Hart a legend?

And I have answered you 3 times now and you feel that MY OPINION is not VALID. ONLY YOUR OPINION IS. Everyone feels differently about this issue, yet you won't ALLOW anyone to form their own opinions without your FLAMING them for having it. I gave my arguement and you belittled me instead of simply saying, your entitled to your opinion. No, Instead, you make it your person vendetta to make me the blunt of your not so funny jokes and so on. I think maybe, its because most people reading this will follow my opinion about Owen Hart versus yours.
 
OK, Then why count what Vader did in JAPAN? OH THATS RIGHT, Its ok for the egomaniac, & arrogant Slyfox to add another country, But not for anyone else. :lmao:
My apologies. I just assumed my sarcasm was obvious enough.

I was being sarcastic, and pointing out how you said Vader wasn't a legend, and showing that Vader was huge all over the world, and that wrestling exists outside of America.

No. They have not been around for DECADES being supporting cast. Val Venis was the IC champ so I wouldn't consider him an absolute waste.
So wait.

Horowitz and Brawler are supporting cast, but can also be a legend. Wow. You're definition of legend seems to be pretty arbitrary.

Just looked it up and it has your picture next to it.
Again, your flaming is not necessary.

For your reading pleasure, here is the DEFINITION of ARROGANCE:an attitude of superiority manifested in an overbearing manner. Which is EXACTLY WHAT YOUR DOING. Your thinking that Your OPINION, is SUPERIOR to mine. I am NOT saying mine is more superior, I am saying that this is MY OPINION. Your the one attacking my opinion asking for FACTS when this entire thread is about OPINION.
What should I think? That my opinion is inferior to yours? :lmao:

And, when supporting opinions, how else are you suppose to do that then facts?

I've never understood how people can think that opinions completely baseless in facts are as valid as those supported by facts.

If you did like him, then you would have some amount of RESPECT for his carisma and in-ring abilities not to mention his accomplishments, to realize that he DESERVES BETTER.
Bullshit.

One has nothing to do with another. This is what being objective is all about. I can like someone, but also recognize their true place and value to the wrestling business.

I like Shark Boy, but hold no illusions of his greatness, or lack thereof.

Just because I like someone doesn't mean that I have to make them out to be better than they really are.

JAPAN does NOT EXSIST in the wrestling world. REMEMBER?
See above.

To me, and once again, this is where you and me differ cause this is my opinion and I am not trying to FORCE IT on to someone or BELITTLE someone else's opinion. I remember him for being a 2 time IC champ, European Champion, 4 time Tag team Champion, & WWE KING of the RING. All of which to ME, Means he DESERVES to be recognized by more than falling to his death as you so elequently put it. Oh, And breaking Austins neck.
Just because YOU remember that, as an obvious big-time fan of Owen, doesn't mean that's what most people remember.

When most people think of Owen, they think of 1 of 3 things.

1) Feud/matches with Bret
2) Austin's neck
and most likely...
3) Fall to his death

See answer above. It says it all to me. Which most will agree.
I'm confused.

Is your answer because he won a bunch of titles?

Legends are the same way. Wake up and smell the shit your shoveling.
This doesn't even make sense.

He gave his OPINION, and I personally see that he IS on to something. WAIT! Here is EXACTLY what I am talking about. Fine example of how you BELITTLE peoples OPINIONS. Worthless. :rolleyes:
No, I'm saying Ryan Clark has no credibility because he rips off the hard work of PWInsider and Wrestling Observer without giving credit, alters the original important to change the meaning, and throws in his own biased opinion.

You used Ryan Clark as a source for your opinion. I'm telling you that your source is pretty worthless, and is laughed at by various wrestling forums that I post at.

Niether did I. I said they were building him LIKE a Goldburg type character. I never said he was the NEXT Goldburg. :rolleyes:
But, their not building him into a Goldberg type character. That's the point.

LMFAO. If that isn't the pot calling the kettle black! You can dish it out yet you can't take it? The doors over there Alice.
I haven't flamed you yet.

You, on the other hand....again, I'm asking you to quit your flaming of me.

And I have answered you 3 times now and you feel that MY OPINION is not VALID. ONLY YOUR OPINION IS. Everyone feels differently about this issue, yet you won't ALLOW anyone to form their own opinions without your FLAMING them for having it. I gave my arguement and you belittled me instead of simply saying, your entitled to your opinion. No, Instead, you make it your person vendetta to make me the blunt of your not so funny jokes and so on. I think maybe, its because most people reading this will follow my opinion about Owen Hart versus yours.
No, you have not yet given your opinion on what Owen Hart did that makes him a legend. You have not outlined what impact he had on the business.

Even if you feel you have already, do it again. Make it clear. I've asked you this several times, and you have not yet given a clear answer.

So, take the time, and fully explain the impact Owen Hart had on the business. Finally, explain what you feel puts Owen Hart in the same category as the Hogans, Austins, Rocks, Brunos, Pipers, Stings, Flairs, and Savage's of the world.


I am asking you clearly and plainly to clarify your case.
 
CAN I VOTE FOR SLYFOX VS OGERZ AS FUED OF THE YEAR?!

What did Owen do? he taught useless wastes of space like Ken Shamrock and Dan Severn to not be as crap. He helped hold WWF together when Bret left and the company had little established talent. He had UNBELIEVABLEY good matches with HBK which lead to a killer angle (used to cover up another real life HBK problem) and was just generally an amazing guy who came THROUGH the T.V. screen as being far more of a hero than this brother can ever claim to be, that must make Bret sad, he's Captain Canada, eh?!
 
My apologies. I just assumed my sarcasm was obvious enough.

I was being sarcastic, and pointing out how you said Vader wasn't a legend, and showing that Vader was huge all over the world, and that wrestling exists outside of America.

BS. You were caught in your own fairytale world. Your constantly talking in circles trying to make me look bad when its YOU that are looking bad. You make one claim and go back on it all in one post. I am beginning to see your age showing.

So wait.

Horowitz and Brawler are supporting cast, but can also be a legend. Wow. You're definition of legend seems to be pretty arbitrary.

OK, for the last time (as I am through with trying to explain it to someone that needs to really read the post and not go directly to the belittling), My definition of a LEGEND is, a person who made an impact on wrestling with not just accomplishments, but their stature in the wrestling world as a whole. I know, I know, *In my best Slyfox impersonation* "fully explain the impact Owen Hart had on the business". BTW, I have explained this 3 times, and here goes NUMBER 4. READ THIS THIS TIME. UNDERSTAND IT before your make more dumb comments without thinking first.

Owen was a 2 time IC champ, European Champion, 4 time Tag team Champion, & WWE KING of the RING. He accomplished more than MOST in the wrestling world. Here's the tricky part here sly, pay attention to this. Owen was a ring GENERAL as his in-ring capabilities far surpassed AUSTIN, BRUNO, & PIPER. He was as technically sound as Bret if not more. He was well like not just by fellow wrestlers, but by THE FANS. Now, this is an OPINION Sly. This is NOT GOSPEL. This is how I FEEL. I don't care if you agree with me or not. It matters NOT to me.

Again, your flaming is not necessary.
Wow...complete ignorance.
Go find a book. It's called "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Pro-Wrestling".

Let's see, you have called me IGNORANT and a DUMMY in these two statements. Seems to me that, That WOULD BE FLAMING. Practice what you preach.

What should I think? That my opinion is inferior to yours? :lmao:

Spoken like a someone that is arrogant. Tell me ONE TIME that I said your OPINION is inferior? For that matter, when did I attack your opinion and say it was wrong? I gave my opinion and you ATTACKED ME. Ever since, I have been trying to explain to you why I feel Owen was underrated and should be considered a legend. Basically, defending myself against your immature and none understanding of the FACTS that this ENTIRE THREAD is about OPINION and NOT FACT. Since you ATTACKED my opinion, I gave it back with the whole VADER as a Legend thing, and I seemed to hit a nerve with you that someone is actually dishing it back to you they way you so much like dishing it out. You could have just asked me why I felt that way, but NOOOOO Sly can't handle the FACT that people like certain wrestlers for more that "DRAW & TITLES". How could they POSSIBLY think someone is a legend that doesn't meet YOUR STANDARDS?

Now you will make a snappy comeback saying some along the lines of "Your standards are low". Right? Sorry to beat you to the punch on this one. My standards are MINE. NOT YOURS OBVIOUSLY. You set a bar that very few will hit in the political world of wrestling. They must make the company billions by selling out an arenas (who's to say all those years Austin was top dog, that people weren't paying to come see someone ELSE and not him?). They MUST be a heavyweight champion to also be included (if your not a favorite of the promoter, there goes that oppurtunity to be a legend). I am entitled to have my standards whether you like them or not.

And, when supporting opinions, how else are you suppose to do that then facts?

I've never understood how people can think that opinions completely baseless in facts are as valid as those supported by facts.

BECAUSE OPINIONS DON'T NEED FACTS UNLESS THEY WERE ASKED FOR. I gave what facts I felt would justify his belonging and my facts were not GOOD ENOUGH FOR YOU. My facts in your OPINION do not support what I am saying! Plus, your talking about a wrestler who did not get to retire and look back and say what he did or did not do. So, In the case of OWEN HART, all you can do is give your heart felt OPINION. Who's to say that Vince told Owen that if he dawned the mask again and became the Blue Blazer again, that a title oppurtunity would be in his near future? Do you know that for a FACT?

I know that I have no idea what could have happened or what could not have happened, but his career ended on a tragic note. We will NEVER know what could have been. So, once again, your basing everything your saying on what happened while he was alive, he was not given the chance to finish out his career like the Hogans, Austins, Rocks, Brunos, Pipers, Stings, Flairs, and Savage's of the world. He was robbed of that oppurtunity by an accident. So, don't sit here acting all godly with your FACTS based on a PARTIAL career. How about adding a new CATAGORY to you oh so precious list, called the Owen Hart's? Wrestlers that died early that acommplished alot, but never got a chance to have a full career showcasing everything he was capable of? Would you add Louie Spicoli to that list? How about Chris Candito?

Bullshit.

One has nothing to do with another. This is what being objective is all about. I can like someone, but also recognize their true place and value to the wrestling business.

I like Shark Boy, but hold no illusions of his greatness, or lack thereof.

Just because I like someone doesn't mean that I have to make them out to be better than they really are.

I never said that Owen was the best walking the planet like your putting me out as saying. I said that Owen, in his short career, accomplished enough for him to be remembered as more than a "Guy that fell and broke his neck". You have NO RESPECT. Maybe you should avoid threads like this as you have NO CLUE what anyone is trying to get you to understand here.

Just because YOU remember that, as an obvious big-time fan of Owen, doesn't mean that's what most people remember.

I am far from a big time fan of Owens. Once again, those are YOUR words. Obviously my parents taught me respect. You must have been sleeping for that class. I respect what Owen did in his short career and the sacrifices he made to the wrestling world including giving his life to it. While this is what I believe, you consistant belittle me for having those feelings. Being arrogant enough to ask me for FACTS when how can you really base this on facts when its a partial career?

When most people think of Owen, they think of 1 of 3 things.

1) Feud/matches with Bret
2) Austin's neck
and most likely...
3) Fall to his death

Thats your OPINION. Congradulations.

I'm confused.

Is your answer because he won a bunch of titles?

This doesn't even make sense.

It should make sense to you as DRAW AND TITLES is all that matters with you. Again, Who's knows what wrestler people came to see? Do you know? Have you been standing outside of EVERY arena asking fans as they were leaving who they paid money to come see? Or as they were coming in? Just because WWE or whatever wrestling website says it doesn't make it FACT. I want the names of everyone that you have compiled these FACTS that Owen was not the wrestler they came to see. Remember when WCW filtered in the GOLDBURG chants on live TV because people was tired of him? Wait, I bet you think that was opinion and the HUNDREDS of people writting in about that was all ficticious.

No, I'm saying Ryan Clark has no credibility because he rips off the hard work of PWInsider and Wrestling Observer without giving credit, alters the original important to change the meaning, and throws in his own biased opinion.

You used Ryan Clark as a source for your opinion. I'm telling you that your source is pretty worthless, and is laughed at by various wrestling forums that I post at.

But, their not building him into a Goldberg type character. That's the point.

Do you have any FACTS to support that claim? Come on, your a guy all about FACTS. Surely you have something to back up what your saying. Who's to say their not stealing his writings and changing words around on him? Give us all your facts. For your sake, and for the sake of this thread, you should stop FLAMING WZ employee's.

Once again, I never said he was a GOLDBERG TYPE charactor, I said he was LIKE it. TOTALLY DIFFERENT. But you won't understand that.

I haven't flamed you yet.

Yes, you have.

You, on the other hand....again, I'm asking you to quit your flaming of me.

You shouldn't have started what you can't finish.


No, you have not yet given your opinion on what Owen Hart did that makes him a legend. You have not outlined what impact he had on the business.

Even if you feel you have already, do it again. Make it clear. I've asked you this several times, and you have not yet given a clear answer.

So, take the time, and fully explain the impact Owen Hart had on the business. Finally, explain what you feel puts Owen Hart in the same category as the Hogans, Austins, Rocks, Brunos, Pipers, Stings, Flairs, and Savage's of the world.

Funny that your the ONLY one that can't understand it. Bearer and others understand. What seems to be your issue?
 
CAN I VOTE FOR SLYFOX VS OGERZ AS FUED OF THE YEAR?!

What did Owen do? he taught useless wastes of space like Ken Shamrock and Dan Severn to not be as crap. He helped hold WWF together when Bret left and the company had little established talent. He had UNBELIEVABLEY good matches with HBK which lead to a killer angle (used to cover up another real life HBK problem) and was just generally an amazing guy who came THROUGH the T.V. screen as being far more of a hero than this brother can ever claim to be, that must make Bret sad, he's Captain Canada, eh?!


WOW, perfectly said. I agree completely with that. I also think Ownes Mic skills were ALOT better than anyone will give him credit for. He may have had a "Screechy Voice" but he worked the mic great.
 
Quote:
When most people think of Owen, they think of 1 of 3 things.

1) Feud/matches with Bret
2) Austin's neck
and most likely...
3) Fall to his death

Thats your OPINION. Congradulations.

*Runs down to ringside in Sly's corner*

Its my opinion, too. The only people I talk to that truly revere the Hart's are either complete Hart fanboys that will praise anything to do with them, period... and people that specifically marked out for Owen Hart. I've never talked to anyone in real life that would lump Owen Hart into a legend grouping or that he was ever under-rated at all.

Did Owen have some great moments? Sure he did. So did Spike Dudley, but he's probably not heading into the Hall of Fame. Lots of people do awesome things and have awesome moments - its what they get paid to do and why they are still employed. Merely being good at your job doesn't make you Employee of the Year. Could Owen have made World Title Status if he hadn't died? Maybe, but we'll never know because he never did. He died, and the outpour of sympathy elevated him to an epic level of status. But it was out of sympathy. Its the same line of logic and thought that gives Rey Mysterio title runs in the wake of the Eddie Guerrero death.

Owen Hart was a WWE superstar. He entertained, like countless others. By today's standards.. alongside people like Khali and Mark Henry... Owen would look like Steve Austin in terms of stardom. From a 20 year standpoint though, I fail to see justification for the never ending outcry for more and more respect for Owen Hart.
 
CAN I VOTE FOR SLYFOX VS OGERZ AS FUED OF THE YEAR?!
Meh, he has to get in line behind Justinsayne, Death Is a Right, Big Wes, Captain Charisma, IrishCanadian, RVDgurl and probably a whole host of others.

BS. You were caught in your own fairytale world. Your constantly talking in circles trying to make me look bad when its YOU that are looking bad. You make one claim and go back on it all in one post. I am beginning to see your age showing.
No, I meant that at the very time. Go back and just read the posts concerning Vader, which is why it came up in the first place. Why would I have brought up Vader, and then in your response to how Vader was only successful in WCW and not at all in WWF, mention that other countries don't count, when Vader's greatest successes came in Japan? It would make no sense.

Go back and read. I assure you, it was completely sarcasm.


And, you don't even know how old I am, so I see no need to bring that up.

OK, for the last time (as I am through with trying to explain it to someone that needs to really read the post and not go directly to the belittling), My definition of a LEGEND is, a person who made an impact on wrestling with not just accomplishments, but their stature in the wrestling world as a whole. I know, I know, *In my best Slyfox impersonation* "fully explain the impact Owen Hart had on the business". BTW, I have explained this 3 times, and here goes NUMBER 4. READ THIS THIS TIME. UNDERSTAND IT before your make more dumb comments without thinking first.
And my definition of a legend is someone who irreplaceable. Someone who could do something that others could not, and accomplished things beyond what the majority of other professional wrestlers could do. Someone who truly was unique and set himself apart from all others.

This does not describe Owen Hart.

Owen was a 2 time IC champ, European Champion, 4 time Tag team Champion, & WWE KING of the RING. He accomplished more than MOST in the wrestling world.
While I realize this is only part of your justification, I want to point out that scripted titles runs in a scripted entertainment venue is not an indicator of greatness. Especially, when none of those titles claim Owen as the best in the company, at least at one time, such as being the WWF/E champion.

Here's the tricky part here sly, pay attention to this. Owen was a ring GENERAL as his in-ring capabilities far surpassed AUSTIN, BRUNO, & PIPER. He was as technically sound as Bret if not more. He was well like not just by fellow wrestlers, but by THE FANS.
And yet, at NO point in his career did he ever have a match with anyone, save perhaps his brother, that would rival a crowd reaction like Austin, Bruno and Piper got a continual basis.

Now, this is an OPINION Sly. This is NOT GOSPEL. This is how I FEEL. I don't care if you agree with me or not. It matters NOT to me.
If it didn't matter to you, then why have you spend the last several posts arguing it with me?

Obviously, it matters to you. And, that's fine. It matters to me too.

Let's see, you have called me IGNORANT and a DUMMY in these two statements. Seems to me that, That WOULD BE FLAMING. Practice what you preach.
:lmao: :lmao:

Ignorant is not an insult. It simply means a lack of awareness. It does not mean "stupid" which is what it is commonly misinterpreted as.

And, the "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Pro-Wrestling" is an actual book, written by Lou Albano. I own it myself...somewhere. It is a really good book, and explains pro-wrestling basics. Look it up on Amazon. It is a real book.

HAHAHAHA

That's funny. I could see where the miscommunication came in. I assure you, neither of those were insults.

Spoken like a someone that is arrogant. Tell me ONE TIME that I said your OPINION is inferior? For that matter, when did I attack your opinion and say it was wrong? I gave my opinion and you ATTACKED ME. Ever since, I have been trying to explain to you why I feel Owen was underrated and should be considered a legend. Basically, defending myself against your immature and none understanding of the FACTS that this ENTIRE THREAD is about OPINION and NOT FACT. Since you ATTACKED my opinion, I gave it back with the whole VADER as a Legend thing, and I seemed to hit a nerve with you that someone is actually dishing it back to you they way you so much like dishing it out. You could have just asked me why I felt that way, but NOOOOO Sly can't handle the FACT that people like certain wrestlers for more that "DRAW & TITLES". How could they POSSIBLY think someone is a legend that doesn't meet YOUR STANDARDS?

Now you will make a snappy comeback saying some along the lines of "Your standards are low". Right? Sorry to beat you to the punch on this one. My standards are MINE. NOT YOURS OBVIOUSLY.
I'll send you a PM to discuss this.

You set a bar that very few will hit in the political world of wrestling. They must make the company billions by selling out an arenas (who's to say all those years Austin was top dog, that people weren't paying to come see someone ELSE and not him?). They MUST be a heavyweight champion to also be included (if your not a favorite of the promoter, there goes that oppurtunity to be a legend). I am entitled to have my standards whether you like them or not.
But...that IS what makes a legend. That's the whole point.

I mean, Rafeal Palmeiro was good baseball player. A very good one. But, he wasn't a legend. Nobody is going to look back 40 years from now and list Rafeal Palmeiro one of the best players of his era.

Just like no one will look back 30 years from now and talk about Owen Hart. They'll talk about Hogan, Savage, Flair, nWo, DX, Austin, Rock, Cena, Triple H...etc. Owen Hart will be the guy known as Bret Hart's brother.

That's not what makes a legend.

BECAUSE OPINIONS DON'T NEED FACTS UNLESS THEY WERE ASKED FOR. I gave what facts I felt would justify his belonging and my facts were not GOOD ENOUGH FOR YOU. My facts in your OPINION do not support what I am saying! Plus, your talking about a wrestler who did not get to retire and look back and say what he did or did not do. So, In the case of OWEN HART, all you can do is give your heart felt OPINION. Who's to say that Vince told Owen that if he dawned the mask again and became the Blue Blazer again, that a title oppurtunity would be in his near future? Do you know that for a FACT?
But, what he COULD have done has nothing to do with what he DID do. We're not talking about his potential. We're talking about what he accomplished.

I could sit here and tell you that Len Bias had all the ability in the world and was a surefire Hall of Famer. However due to his death, he never got to show it. But, that has nothing to do with whether he was a legend or not. Len Bias is not an NBA legend, despite all the ability and talent in the world. He never accomplished that plateau.

Just like Owen never accomplished that level of greatness. You can't judge a guy on hypothetical success.

I know that I have no idea what could have happened or what could not have happened, but his career ended on a tragic note. We will NEVER know what could have been. So, once again, your basing everything your saying on what happened while he was alive
Exactly! Because that's the only way you can judge him. You can't judge a person on "What If". What if Ricky Steamboat hasn't quit the WWF to be with his wife? What if Hogan had never left the AWA? What if Rick Martel has been given the Hulk Hogan push?

You can't judge on "what if". Only on what they did accomplish. A "what if" has nothing to do with determining if they are a legend.

he was not given the chance to finish out his career like the Hogans, Austins, Rocks, Brunos, Pipers, Stings, Flairs, and Savage's of the world. He was robbed of that oppurtunity by an accident.
With regards to the discussion of him being given respect and being a legend, tough. Just because he died doesn't mean he gets a free pass.

The facts, plain and simple, are that he was never a major draw, never trusted to hold the company's highest title, never was good in promos, never asked to carry the company, and he toiled in the midcard his entire career.

So, don't sit here acting all godly with your FACTS based on a PARTIAL career. How about adding a new CATAGORY to you oh so precious list, called the Owen Hart's? Wrestlers that died early that acommplished alot, but never got a chance to have a full career showcasing everything he was capable of? Would you add Louie Spicoli to that list? How about Chris Candito?
Um...what? I don't understand what that has to do with this conversation. And, both Spicolli and Candido are completely overrated as well. Well, Candido is, as nobody actually remembers who Louie Spicolli is (understand that "nobody" refers to the majority of wrestling fans).

I never said that Owen was the best walking the planet like your putting me out as saying. I said that Owen, in his short career, accomplished enough for him to be remembered as more than a "Guy that fell and broke his neck". You have NO RESPECT. Maybe you should avoid threads like this as you have NO CLUE what anyone is trying to get you to understand here.
No, I understand completely. And, comments like him being a legend is vastly overrating him.

Which has been my point all along.

I am far from a big time fan of Owens. Once again, those are YOUR words. Obviously my parents taught me respect. You must have been sleeping for that class.
*sigh*

I'm trying really hard to keep this conversation civil. I ask that you do the same.

I respect what Owen did in his short career and the sacrifices he made to the wrestling world including giving his life to it. While this is what I believe, you consistant belittle me for having those feelings. Being arrogant enough to ask me for FACTS when how can you really base this on facts when its a partial career?
Wait.

I'm being arrogant because I'm asking you to use facts to support your position?

It should make sense to you as DRAW AND TITLES is all that matters with you. Again, Who's knows what wrestler people came to see? Do you know? Have you been standing outside of EVERY arena asking fans as they were leaving who they paid money to come see? Or as they were coming in? Just because WWE or whatever wrestling website says it doesn't make it FACT.
Ok, here you go then.

1. When WWF Raw comes on television, the Neilson ratings measures how many fans watch through each quarter hour. Those numbers are compiled by Neilson and the WWF/E reviews them. They can see how many viewers were gained and lost through each segment. So, when they see that a Funaki segment loses 200,000 viewers, and a Steve Austin segment gains 600,000 viewers, they know that Steve Austin is a draw, particularly when it happens time and again.

2. The WWF/E gauges house show attendance to see who are draws. It's a well known fact that the main-eventers are what draw attendance to shows (and I'll explain that in a second). So, when a draw that features John Cena draws better than a show that features a King Booker, they know that John Cena is the bigger draw.

3. Merchandise sales are a great indicator of drawing ability. People, in general, are going to buy the merchandise of their favorite wrestlers. Those who bring in more merchandise money, are the bigger draws.

4. Crowd involvement in matches are another indicator of drawing ability. If a crowd is hot for a wrestler, and remains so throughout a match, it shows the guy is obviously a person that fans want to see, or, in the case of a heel, a guy that crowd wants to see get beat up.

5. Those who rate high in those areas are the ones who get the pushes. WWF saw that Steve Austin ratings drew well, house show attendance went up when he was around, he sold merchandise and had great crowd involvement in his matches. So, they pushed him to the main-event, and he became the second greatest draw the business has ever seen.


SOOO, when I see guys who are in the main-event, and being given runs as the top guy in the company, I know that they had to pass all those other stages to get there, as the WWE is not going to put a guy in the main-event slot who does not maximize their financial bottom line.


That's how a person knows who the crowd came to see.

Do you have any FACTS to support that claim? Come on, your a guy all about FACTS. Surely you have something to back up what your saying. Who's to say their not stealing his writings and changing words around on him? Give us all your facts. For your sake, and for the sake of this thread, you should stop FLAMING WZ employee's.
Because, it comes out in the Wrestling Observer before he ever posts it? Because when WZ has something that others don't, they make sure they point out it's a WZ exclusive? Because Dave Meltzer actually has sources in the wrestling industry and has for many many years? Because Ryan Clark actually cites The Wrestling Observer or PWInsider for some of his reports?

As far as the altering things around, you have to own the Wrestling Observer, or know someone who does. Your facts are right in there.

Once again, I never said he was a GOLDBERG TYPE charactor, I said he was LIKE it. TOTALLY DIFFERENT. But you won't understand that.
Yes...totally different...:rolleyes:

Yes, you have.
Already explained

You shouldn't have started what you can't finish.
HAHAHAHA

Yeah, that's it. You sure did get the best of me, and I just can't hang with someone of your expertise. You are so much better at flaming people than I am. Congratulations.

Now that we got that out of the way, do you think you can drop the sillyness and just talk about the topic?

*Runs down to ringside in Sly's corner*

Its my opinion, too. The only people I talk to that truly revere the Hart's are either complete Hart fanboys that will praise anything to do with them, period... and people that specifically marked out for Owen Hart. I've never talked to anyone in real life that would lump Owen Hart into a legend grouping or that he was ever under-rated at all.
Exactly.

Did Owen have some great moments? Sure he did. So did Spike Dudley, but he's probably not heading into the Hall of Fame. Lots of people do awesome things and have awesome moments - its what they get paid to do and why they are still employed. Merely being good at your job doesn't make you Employee of the Year. Could Owen have made World Title Status if he hadn't died? Maybe, but we'll never know because he never did. He died, and the outpour of sympathy elevated him to an epic level of status. But it was out of sympathy. Its the same line of logic and thought that gives Rey Mysterio title runs in the wake of the Eddie Guerrero death.

Owen Hart was a WWE superstar. He entertained, like countless others. By today's standards.. alongside people like Khali and Mark Henry... Owen would look like Steve Austin in terms of stardom. From a 20 year standpoint though, I fail to see justification for the never ending outcry for more and more respect for Owen Hart.
Wonderful post. Well said.
 
Meh, he has to get in line behind Justinsayne, Death Is a Right, Big Wes, Captain Charisma, IrishCanadian, RVDgurl and probably a whole host of others.

I'm a leader, not a follower.

No, I meant that at the very time. Go back and just read the posts concerning Vader, which is why it came up in the first place. Why would I have brought up Vader, and then in your response to how Vader was only successful in WCW and not at all in WWF, mention that other countries don't count, when Vader's greatest successes came in Japan? It would make no sense.

Go back and read. I assure you, it was completely sarcasm.

Yeah. OK.

And my definition of a legend is someone who irreplaceable. Someone who could do something that others could not, and accomplished things beyond what the majority of other professional wrestlers could do. Someone who truly was unique and set himself apart from all others.

EVERYONE IS REPLACEABLE.

This does not describe Owen Hart.

Depends on who you ask.

While I realize this is only part of your justification, I want to point out that scripted titles runs in a scripted entertainment venue is not an indicator of greatness. Especially, when none of those titles claim Owen as the best in the company, at least at one time, such as being the WWF/E champion.

And yet, at NO point in his career did he ever have a match with anyone, save perhaps his brother, that would rival a crowd reaction like Austin, Bruno and Piper got a continual basis.

Same goes for LEGENDS. So there goes that theory in the wind. Whoever gets the best scripts gets to be top dog. Like I have said many times, Vince will shove someone down your throat until you like them alot, or hate them with a passion.

If it didn't matter to you, then why have you spend the last several posts arguing it with me?

Obviously, it matters to you. And, that's fine. It matters to me too.

Here's the difference, I will not stand by or run from someone with the likes of you that try to bully me into eating a shit pie. I will stand up and DEFEND myself from your needless attacks on my personal beliefs and my intellect.

Ignorant is not an insult. It simply means a lack of awareness. It does not mean "stupid" which is what it is commonly misinterpreted as.

And, the "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Pro-Wrestling" is an actual book, written by Lou Albano. I own it myself...somewhere. It is a really good book, and explains pro-wrestling basics. Look it up on Amazon. It is a real book.

That's funny. I could see where the miscommunication came in. I assure you, neither of those were insults.

You can define it that way to suit your needs, thats fine. But I took that as a direct insult on my ability to think for myself and form my own opinions without belittling comments.

But, what he COULD have done has nothing to do with what he DID do. We're not talking about his potential. We're talking about what he accomplished.

I could sit here and tell you that Len Bias had all the ability in the world and was a surefire Hall of Famer. However due to his death, he never got to show it. But, that has nothing to do with whether he was a legend or not. Len Bias is not an NBA legend, despite all the ability and talent in the world. He never accomplished that plateau.

Just like Owen never accomplished that level of greatness. You can't judge a guy on hypothetical success.

Once again, Your putting words in my mouth.

Exactly! Because that's the only way you can judge him. You can't judge a person on "What If". What if Ricky Steamboat hasn't quit the WWF to be with his wife? What if Hogan had never left the AWA? What if Rick Martel has been given the Hulk Hogan push?

You can't judge on "what if". Only on what they did accomplish. A "what if" has nothing to do with determining if they are a legend.

Again, Words in my mouth. I at NO POINT said that I was basing ANY SENTENCE I HAVE WRITTEN on "What If's". I was simply trying to get you to uderstand that you can't say he never won a world title in the WWE so your out of that running. I have based EVERY STATEMENT on what he did while he was ALIVE. PERIOD.

Lets talk about Austin. It took him 16 years to amount to something more than "The Ringmaster". Another 2 to get to the title. Thats 18 years to get to legendary status (By your standards) not to mention the 16 it took just to get off of the mid card status. Owen was only wrestling for about 12 years. Yet here he had been a CHAMPION before and DID carry a company on his back on 3 seperate occasions. In Austins 18 years leading up to his first World Title Reign, he was NEVER the person to carry a company of ANY KIND. So, for what Owen accomplished up until his death, DOES WARRENT RESPECT.

With regards to the discussion of him being given respect and being a legend, tough. Just because he died doesn't mean he gets a free pass.

In my opinion, he HAS done enough at the very least to get the RESPECT he RIGHTFULLY DESERVES. Nobody is saying he deserves a free pass. People that look back at his career, look at the entire picture, not just his WWE days like your doing.

The facts, plain and simple, are that he was never a major draw, never trusted to hold the company's highest title, never was good in promos, never asked to carry the company, and he toiled in the midcard his entire career.

"He toiled in the midcard his entire career". Lets see, hes been Stampede North American Heavyweight Champion TWICE, USWA Unified World Heavyweight Champion, & IWGP Junior Heavyweight Champion. Not bad for a "Career Midcarder".

Um...what? I don't understand what that has to do with this conversation. And, both Spicolli and Candido are completely overrated as well. Well, Candido is, as nobody actually remembers who Louie Spicolli is (understand that "nobody" refers to the majority of wrestling fans).

While I have to agree that the I just spoke Greek to the majority of the wrestling fans, they were used to simply say that they, like Owen died before getting to blossum into something more.

I'm being arrogant because I'm asking you to use facts to support your position?

NO. Your being arrogant in thinking that all your oinions are ABSOLUTE. While mine are "Ignorant" and "Dumb". Also how your constantly putting words in my mouth to try and make me look bad.

Ok, here you go then.

1. When WWF Raw comes on television, the Neilson ratings measures how many fans watch through each quarter hour. Those numbers are compiled by Neilson and the WWF/E reviews them. They can see how many viewers were gained and lost through each segment. So, when they see that a Funaki segment loses 200,000 viewers, and a Steve Austin segment gains 600,000 viewers, they know that Steve Austin is a draw, particularly when it happens time and again.

I never said ANYTHING about TV. Once again, putting words in my mouth. Seems to be the basis of everything in your world. You were talking about people that went to LIVE SHOWS and paid their MONEY to see them. I went to a live RAW show back when Austin was the "Big Draw" not to see him, but to see KANE. Which, at that time, was wearing his mask and destroying everyone in his path.

2. The WWF/E gauges house show attendance to see who are draws. It's a well known fact that the main-eventers are what draw attendance to shows (and I'll explain that in a second). So, when a draw that features John Cena draws better than a show that features a King Booker, they know that John Cena is the bigger draw.

I have been to many live events where during the main event you could hear a pin drop. This all means nothing.

3. Merchandise sales are a great indicator of drawing ability. People, in general, are going to buy the merchandise of their favorite wrestlers. Those who bring in more merchandise money, are the bigger draws.

As of right this minute, Austin owns 3 of the top ten merchandise sales. Can you go see him wrestle? People are buying the hell out of a T-shirt that simply says "DAMN". Can you see Ron Simmons wrestle? That proves nothing.

4. Crowd involvement in matches are another indicator of drawing ability. If a crowd is hot for a wrestler, and remains so throughout a match, it shows the guy is obviously a person that fans want to see, or, in the case of a heel, a guy that crowd wants to see get beat up.

I have seen & heard better responses for midcard wrestlers than main eventers. So that could very easily mean that people came to see them.

5. Those who rate high in those areas are the ones who get the pushes. WWF saw that Steve Austin ratings drew well, house show attendance went up when he was around, he sold merchandise and had great crowd involvement in his matches. So, they pushed him to the main-event, and he became the second greatest draw the business has ever seen.

I am not questioning who gets pushes. But that would raise another question of, when midcarders like Jeff Hardy gets the loudest pop of the night, why is Vince NOT pushing them to the top? BTW, once again, I have never said that AUSTIN was not one of the biggest draws in the business. Nor did I say that he didn't deserve it.


SOOO, when I see guys who are in the main-event, and being given runs as the top guy in the company, I know that they had to pass all those other stages to get there, as the WWE is not going to put a guy in the main-event slot who does not maximize their financial bottom line.

Once again, I NEVER SAID that guys that are making more money for the company should not get pushed. This has nothing to do whith anything.

That's how a person knows who the crowd came to see.

You have proven nothing to me but that you will change the grounds of this conversation and twist it to your liking and bring up points that do not pertain to past comments. Your whole rant above about how the WWE bases who people want to see and who draws the most money came from a comment saying that EVERYONE pays their money to see a LIVE shows Main eventer. No mention of TV, no mention of merchadise or anything else was made by me. I just countered a comment saying people only go to live shows to see the Main event.

Yeah, that's it. You sure did get the best of me, and I just can't hang with someone of your expertise. You are so much better at flaming people than I am. Congratulations.

This to me is not about flaming. This to me is about me standing up to ignorant people in the world trying to make people feel bad, stupid or not post in this forum at the risk or your ignorant responses with belittling comments. I simply stated my opinion and you jumped all over me calling me Ignorant and Dumb. Should I sit here and take your bullshit like so many people probably have?

Now that we got that out of the way, do you think you can drop the sillyness and just talk about the topic?

I am not the one who left the topic. YOU DID.

*Runs down to ringside in Sly's corner*

Its my opinion, too. The only people I talk to that truly revere the Hart's are either complete Hart fanboys that will praise anything to do with them, period... and people that specifically marked out for Owen Hart. I've never talked to anyone in real life that would lump Owen Hart into a legend grouping or that he was ever under-rated at all.

Did Owen have some great moments? Sure he did. So did Spike Dudley, but he's probably not heading into the Hall of Fame. Lots of people do awesome things and have awesome moments - its what they get paid to do and why they are still employed. Merely being good at your job doesn't make you Employee of the Year. Could Owen have made World Title Status if he hadn't died? Maybe, but we'll never know because he never did. He died, and the outpour of sympathy elevated him to an epic level of status. But it was out of sympathy. Its the same line of logic and thought that gives Rey Mysterio title runs in the wake of the Eddie Guerrero death.

Owen Hart was a WWE superstar. He entertained, like countless others. By today's standards.. alongside people like Khali and Mark Henry... Owen would look like Steve Austin in terms of stardom. From a 20 year standpoint though, I fail to see justification for the never ending outcry for more and more respect for Owen Hart.

:lmao: *Runs down to ringside in Sly's corner* :lmao:

Funny I didn't need LMAO *interference at ringside* AAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Thats your opinion, your entitled to it. I respect your thoughts. When I look at someone as being someone that deserves respect for what they have accomplished in the wrestling world, I don't base my entire outcome on what happened in one promotion. I base it on the legacy he left behind. People in Canada would argue that he did so much more in wrestling as they got to see him all the time in Stampede wrestling.

Look at Flair. While he has been WWE champ, the majority has been in NWA & WCW. Should Flair not count all those title reigns because it wasn't with the WWE? NO. He was a champion everywhere he was and deserves it. From my stand point, a Legend should NEVER be considered by what they did in one promotion. If they did, Hardcore ECW fans or hardcore WCW fans would say, "well, Austin didn't accomplish anything in ECW, so, he doesn't deserve to be recognized as a Legend".

You have to be unbias and look at the big picture. Not pieces of it.
 
Owen Hart is very underrated. He put on amazing promos. He was someone who could always draw heat on the mic. He always just put down his opponent on the mic.

And he was an amazing technical wrestler. I would say he is wayyyy up there for top ten best wrestlers. He had great matches consistently. His matches with Bret and Shawn come to mind. They were great. You could always expect something watchable and enjoyable from him.

Sure his untimely death made him a Legend but still. Tge man does deserve more respect than he gets for being a great wrestler.

He did not get as far as he should have because of his size. Paul hit the nail on the head. Vince has always liked bigger superstars. Andre, Hogan, Warrior, Lashley, hell he even made Khali champion. Owen did not get as far because he had a size disadvantage. At the time he was wrestling the big men were in the title picture.

Owen also doesnt get the respect he deserves because of his brother. Sure Bret was great, and sure he helped pave the way for smaller superstars to be on top, but honestly, I find him somewhat boring at times. Owen was always great at putting on great matches.
 
Here's the difference, I will not stand by or run from someone with the likes of you that try to bully me into eating a shit pie. I will stand up and DEFEND myself from your needless attacks on my personal beliefs and my intellect.
*sigh* If you really think I'm trying to bully you, by countering your opinions, then I don't know what to tell you.

You can define it that way to suit your needs, thats fine. But I took that as a direct insult on my ability to think for myself and form my own opinions without belittling comments.
Not my fault. The fact is that it was not a flame.

Once again, Your putting words in my mouth.
No, I'm not. You said that we can't judge him simply by what he did, because that's unfair to compare to others.
You said:
So, once again, your basing everything your saying on what happened while he was alive...So, don't sit here acting all godly with your FACTS based on a PARTIAL career.
All I'm saying is that the only thing we CAN judge him on is what he did in that career.

Again, Words in my mouth. I at NO POINT said that I was basing ANY SENTENCE I HAVE WRITTEN on "What If's". I was simply trying to get you to uderstand that you can't say he never won a world title in the WWE so your out of that running. I have based EVERY STATEMENT on what he did while he was ALIVE. PERIOD.

Lets talk about Austin. It took him 16 years to amount to something more than "The Ringmaster". Another 2 to get to the title. Thats 18 years to get to legendary status (By your standards) not to mention the 16 it took just to get off of the mid card status. Owen was only wrestling for about 12 years. Yet here he had been a CHAMPION before and DID carry a company on his back on 3 seperate occasions. In Austins 18 years leading up to his first World Title Reign, he was NEVER the person to carry a company of ANY KIND. So, for what Owen accomplished up until his death, DOES WARRENT RESPECT.
No, it doesn't. Just like Austin was not a legend in the business until his phenomenal run from 1997-2001. Steve Austin was not a legend, until he did something that made him legend worthy.

Owen Hart never had that.
In my opinion, he HAS done enough at the very least to get the RESPECT he RIGHTFULLY DESERVES. Nobody is saying he deserves a free pass. People that look back at his career, look at the entire picture, not just his WWE days like your doing.

"He toiled in the midcard his entire career". Lets see, hes been Stampede North American Heavyweight Champion TWICE, USWA Unified World Heavyweight Champion, & IWGP Junior Heavyweight Champion. Not bad for a "Career Midcarder".
You're right. Not bad for a career midcarder. Doesn't change the fact that he was a career midcarder.

While I have to agree that the I just spoke Greek to the majority of the wrestling fans, they were used to simply say that they, like Owen died before getting to blossum into something more.
Who cares? The fact is that when they died they were relative nobodies in the grand scheme of wrestling legends. I'm not here to debate who could have been what. Simply here to say who did what.

I never said ANYTHING about TV. Once again, putting words in my mouth. Seems to be the basis of everything in your world. You were talking about people that went to LIVE SHOWS and paid their MONEY to see them. I went to a live RAW show back when Austin was the "Big Draw" not to see him, but to see KANE. Which, at that time, was wearing his mask and destroying everyone in his path.
You asked how I knew the reason that most people went to the show to see the big draw. I explained it.

You have proven nothing to me but that you will change the grounds of this conversation and twist it to your liking and bring up points that do not pertain to past comments. Your whole rant above about how the WWE bases who people want to see and who draws the most money came from a comment saying that EVERYONE pays their money to see a LIVE shows Main eventer. No mention of TV, no mention of merchadise or anything else was made by me. I just countered a comment saying people only go to live shows to see the Main event.
You're not getting it. I said that Owen Hart wasn't a draw, and this was proven by the fact that he was never pushed to the main-event.

You asked how I knew, and I explained it to you. The only one who is twisting words and meaning around is you.

This to me is not about flaming. This to me is about me standing up to ignorant people in the world trying to make people feel bad, stupid or not post in this forum at the risk or your ignorant responses with belittling comments. I simply stated my opinion and you jumped all over me calling me Ignorant and Dumb. Should I sit here and take your bullshit like so many people probably have?
I don't know how to explain this any further. Ignorant is not an insult, look up the actual meaning of the word. Pro Wrestling for Dummies is an actual book, look it up. They were not flames, and never intended to be such. I apologize if you took it as that, but the cold hard truth is that it wasn't. I honestly could not give a rat's ass what you feel, or what martyrdom you are trying to accomplish here.

If you don't like what I have to say, then don't reply. But, for the third time, I'm asking you to quit attacking me personally, and focus on the thread.

I am not the one who left the topic. YOU DID.
I'm also the one who is trying to get it back on track. So, focus on that.
 
it makes me sick of how people do not respect owen hart, this man was a legend and he provided us with memories when he was a part of the hart foundation, i dont like vince for what he did to owen in his final months, he used him like meat, owen obviously wanted to leave the wwe after the screwjob on bret but vince wouldnt allow it, vince is a selfish bastard, i know owen wouldve went to wcw with bret but i just hope that if he did go to wcw, that wcw wouldnt have treated him like meat but most likely wcw wouldve have done that, so i at least thank god that he didnt experience wcw, RIP Owen, you were a true legend and you should be in the hall of fame next year and if you dont respect owen you should take john cena's advice and FU
 
*sigh* If you really think I'm trying to bully you, by countering your opinions, then I don't know what to tell you.

It's one thing to counter opinions, it's a totally different thing to say they are wrong. Opinions are just that, OPINIONS. Their not right or wrong. EVERONE has their own. You seem to think yours is ABSOLUTE. You can keep sitting here trying to get everyone here to believe that it is me doing it, but bottomline is, I responded to the FACT that you attacked me. Period.

Not my fault. The fact is that it was not a flame.

It was a flame. Anyway you slice it, it WAS a flame.

No, I'm not. You said that we can't judge him simply by what he did, because that's unfair to compare to others.

I'm beginning to see that when your reading, your also not reading it the way it was written. I said, You can NOT compare Owen to Austin, Flair, Vader :lmao:, Bret, Hogan and others. YOUR COMPARING HIM TO THOSE GUYS. NOT ME. Those are ALL unfair as they had FULL CAREERS. So, YES, IT IS UNFAIR. You can NOT compare a partial career to a full one. NOW, IF Owen retired only accomplishing those things, then YES, I could see your point.

All I'm saying is that the only thing we CAN judge him on is what he did in that career.

And I am saying that in the short time he was wrestling, he accomplished enough to be recognized by the wrestling world as more than "The guy that fell and broke his neck" as you put it. Looking through this thread, it seems that Majority feels the same way. I must not be too "Ignorant".

No, it doesn't. Just like Austin was not a legend in the business until his phenomenal run from 1997-2001. Steve Austin was not a legend, until he did something that made him legend worthy.

Owen Hart never had that.

Just like it took Austin more than 16 years to reach it, Owen was denied that oppurtunity. This is not about "WHAT IF'S" like your making me out to be saying. This is simply, HE DESERVES MORE. His career even though it was short, was still impressive. BOTTOMLINE. I am trying to get you to stop thinking that because he was not WWE champion, doesn't mean he still was not worthy of more respect. He DID for FACT accomplish more than Austin in the same time frame comparing both of their careers in a time line. So, Why not say Hey, Owen may have not have won the "BIG ONE" as you put it, but he deserves RESPECT for his accomplishments and his contributions to the wrestling world.

You're right. Not bad for a career midcarder. Doesn't change the fact that he was a career midcarder.

Good one. Your an Owen hater. Period. You can blow smoke up everyone's ass saying you liked him, but everyone in here knows the truth. He was FAR from a CAREER MID-CARDER. I provided the FACTS to you yet you STILL insist that the WWE is the be all end all and if your didn't win it there, your nothing. It also proves my statements about you thinking your opinions are ABSOLUTE as I provided you with your oh so precious FACTS yet you still deny it.

Who cares? The fact is that when they died they were relative nobodies in the grand scheme of wrestling legends. I'm not here to debate who could have been what. Simply here to say who did what.

Either am I. Your the one bringing up Legends and comparing Owen to them. I made one comment on how it was unfair to compare them to Owen and you took that and tried to twist it around. I also said that if Owen had not died, then who knows how his career would end up and THEN you could compare him to the Legends. But, until god sends Owen back to us to have that chance, you need to stop making irrelivent comments comparing him to Legends.

You asked how I knew the reason that most people went to the show to see the big draw. I explained it.

I proved you wrong. Nothing that WWE compiles or TNA, or WCW, Or any of them makes me think that their completely right. They could tell you that just to get more people to like someone. I want hard core numbers from ACTUAL people attending live events. THATS FACT. Everything you said is bias. PERIOD.

You're not getting it. I said that Owen Hart wasn't a draw, and this was proven by the fact that he was never pushed to the main-event.

Once again, your opinion, and while I respect your opinion, He was in MAIN EVENT status in Stampede and USWA. So once again, theres your FACT that you will consistantly deny because you don't like being proven wrong ESPECIALLY when I use a word that you like to toss around but means nothing to you really, FACT.

You asked how I knew, and I explained it to you. The only one who is twisting words and meaning around is you.

I have not twisted one single word of yours. You explained it and I countered your facts intelligently and this is the response I get in return.

I don't know how to explain this any further. Ignorant is not an insult, look up the actual meaning of the word. Pro Wrestling for Dummies is an actual book, look it up. They were not flames, and never intended to be such. I apologize if you took it as that, but the cold hard truth is that it wasn't. I honestly could not give a rat's ass what you feel, or what martyrdom you are trying to accomplish here.

Here you go Sly, since you have posted the meaning of the word ignorant, I will give the COMPLETE DEFINITION since you ONLY posted what you wanted, to justify calling me IGNORANT. ig·no·rant: destitute of knowledge or education <an ignorant society>; also : lacking knowledge or comprehension of the thing specified <parents ignorant of modern mathematics> b: resulting from or showing lack of knowledge or intelligence Since you told me to go get a book about wrestling for dummies, this would fit the way you used the word IGNORANT. FLAME. Once again, YOur PROVEN wrong by the word you cherish. FACTS.

If you don't like what I have to say, then don't reply. But, for the third time, I'm asking you to quit attacking me personally, and focus on the thread.

:lmao: The TRUTH here is, your losing this battle. EVERYONE KNOWS IT. The almighty Sly is being shown up by a noobie to the forum. What a shame. Once again, you started it. If you couldn't handle it, you should have keep your ARROGANT comments to yourself. You should have stayed on TOPIC and NOT belittled me infront of the community and expect me to sit by quietly while you bash me. Think before you speak.

I'm also the one who is trying to get it back on track. So, focus on that.

Other than there being a little offtopic comments in my post defending myself from your arrogant attacks, I have been talking about Owen in everyone of my posts. It's not my fault that your in here talking about a wrestlers respect when you can't give it to me and respect my opinions or challenge them without Flaming or Attacking me.

BTW, Don't even sit here and portray me as attacking you. ANYONE can read back and see it was YOU that started all of this crap. I guess you have yet to meet someone that will not back down. EVER.
 
wow...just wow....

Owen hart is NOWERE NEAR HHH, steve austin, Vader, or even Rick Rude, on ANY thing you could grade a pro wrestler on. He was very technically skilled in the ring (besides that he botched a pile driver and almost fuckin crippled stone cold steve austin), and pretty talented on the mic. but NOWERE NEAR a legend. He never was, and never would be anything than an upper mid carder, and jobber to the stars. It wasnt becuase he wasnt "big and muscular" that he didnt get pushed, he just plain wasnt that good, and no one wanted ot see him very bad. His two memorable feuds were carried by bret hart and steve austin, two of the greatest workers we have seen(btw think about what I just said....Vince only pushs big guys eh? yea Shawn micheals, Austin, and Bret Hart were just fuckin enormous werent they....)

Vader has about ten times as much cred as Owen, and deserves it. They did some of the same moves AND VADER WAS OVER 300 FUCKIN POUNDS!!!!...to say Owen was a "Legend" and Vader isnt, just becuase he died, is absolutely ridiculous.. The post death legend thing is so out of control. The only guys who deserves the praise he gets in the modern era of wrestlers who have died, are Eddie Guerreo and Mr.Perfect (yea I left benoit out)

Dont say that becuase Jim Neidhart was included in a video game that Owen doesnt get respect. 1. Owens wife and family probably would never LET them put him in. 2. Neidhart isnt more respected, it was dumb in general to put him in that game as a legend. Give me the million dollar man, or something for fucks sake. neither Owen OR Neidhart should be put in a fuckin game as a legend. It was a just a dumbass decision by THQ. Thanks.

Owen Hart gets plenty of respect. Probably more than he should.
 
You can keep sitting here trying to get everyone here to believe that it is me doing it, but bottomline is, I responded to the FACT that you attacked me. Period.
You DO realize that YOU were the one who began all of the personal attacks, correct? Go back and read.

Note when you say "Sly, LOL, You got issues bro.". You attacked me first. FACT.

I'm beginning to see that when your reading, your also not reading it the way it was written. I said, You can NOT compare Owen to Austin, Flair, Vader :lmao:, Bret, Hogan and others. YOUR COMPARING HIM TO THOSE GUYS. NOT ME. Those are ALL unfair as they had FULL CAREERS. So, YES, IT IS UNFAIR. You can NOT compare a partial career to a full one. NOW, IF Owen retired only accomplishing those things, then YES, I could see your point.
But, if you want to call Owen a legend, you HAVE to compare them to those guys. Because they are legends. That's the whole point of this debate, as it has stood between the two of us.

Just like it took Austin more than 16 years to reach it, Owen was denied that oppurtunity. This is not about "WHAT IF'S" like your making me out to be saying. This is simply, HE DESERVES MORE. His career even though it was short, was still impressive. BOTTOMLINE. I am trying to get you to stop thinking that because he was not WWE champion, doesn't mean he still was not worthy of more respect. He DID for FACT accomplish more than Austin in the same time frame comparing both of their careers in a time line. So, Why not say Hey, Owen may have not have won the "BIG ONE" as you put it, but he deserves RESPECT for his accomplishments and his contributions to the wrestling world.
For what accomplishments? Meaningless props given to him through management decisions? What contributions did he make?

You keep talking about him like he did something amazing. He didn't. He was a midcarder. He was an Intercontinenetal and Tag Team wrestler. That was all.

Good one. Your an Owen hater. Period. You can blow smoke up everyone's ass saying you liked him, but everyone in here knows the truth.
Well, I'm glad you are here to tell me who I do and do not like. :rolleyes:

Do you even realize how silly it sounds for you to try and tell me who I like and don't?

Why do you not understand that objectivity is what any good debate is based around? And, objectively speaking, Owen is not a legend. Simple fact.

He was FAR from a CAREER MID-CARDER. I provided the FACTS to you yet you STILL insist that the WWE is the be all end all and if your didn't win it there, your nothing. It also proves my statements about you thinking your opinions are ABSOLUTE as I provided you with your oh so precious FACTS yet you still deny it.
Your facts were that he was a heavyweight champ of his father's promotion right before he was signed by the WWF, USWA champ WHILE he was a member of the WWF in the Hart vs. Lawler feud, and an under card champion in NJPW.

Not exactly a ringing endorsement for proving he was more than a midcarder.

Either am I. Your the one bringing up Legends and comparing Owen to them.
Duh? Is that not what we've been talking about?

I made one comment on how it was unfair to compare them to Owen and you took that and tried to twist it around. I also said that if Owen had not died, then who knows how his career would end up and THEN you could compare him to the Legends. But, until god sends Owen back to us to have that chance, you need to stop making irrelivent comments comparing him to Legends.
No, I don't.

Because to consider someone a legend, you have to measure what they accomplish against other legends.

I proved you wrong. Nothing that WWE compiles or TNA, or WCW, Or any of them makes me think that their completely right. They could tell you that just to get more people to like someone. I want hard core numbers from ACTUAL people attending live events. THATS FACT. Everything you said is bias. PERIOD.
HAHAHAHAHA

You proved me wrong by saying that the WWE doesn't try to maximize profits by putting the guys who draw the best in positions to be pushed? That the WWE doesn't know who brings the most people to the shows, and who is the more interesting characters on their show?

Your argument here is like someone covering their face with their hands while simultaneously telling someone they'll only believe it if they see it.

I mean, are you really trying to tell me that more people went to the shows to see Owen Hart than Steve Austin? We KNOW that's untrue. Because, if they had, Owen Hart would have been a main-eventer, feuding with other main-eventers. It would be poor business to not do so.

Once again, your opinion, and while I respect your opinion, He was in MAIN EVENT status in Stampede and USWA. So once again, theres your FACT that you will consistantly deny because you don't like being proven wrong ESPECIALLY when I use a word that you like to toss around but means nothing to you really, FACT.
Being main-event status in minor league promotions does not make one a legend.

Here you go Sly, since you have posted the meaning of the word ignorant, I will give the COMPLETE DEFINITION since you ONLY posted what you wanted, to justify calling me IGNORANT. ig·no·rant: destitute of knowledge or education <an ignorant society>; also : lacking knowledge or comprehension of the thing specified <parents ignorant of modern mathematics> b: resulting from or showing lack of knowledge or intelligence Since you told me to go get a book about wrestling for dummies, this would fit the way you used the word IGNORANT. FLAME. Once again, YOur PROVEN wrong by the word you cherish. FACTS.
HAHAHAHA :lmao:

You post an entire paragraph on what "Ignorant" means, and you pick ONE word out of the whole entire paragraph to try and make your point, while ignoring the other three definitions which prove mine. That's too funny.

1. destitute of knowledge or education
2. lacking knowledge or comprehension of the thing specified
3. resulting from or showing lack of knowledge
4. or intelligence

So, three definitions prove me right, and one word makes your case. Get over it. It wasn't a flame.

:lmao: The TRUTH here is, your losing this battle. EVERYONE KNOWS IT. The almighty Sly is being shown up by a noobie to the forum. What a shame. Once again, you started it. If you couldn't handle it, you should have keep your ARROGANT comments to yourself. You should have stayed on TOPIC and NOT belittled me infront of the community and expect me to sit by quietly while you bash me. Think before you speak.
When you say "everyone knows it", I suppose your excluding the several people who have repped me who agree with me? Or the numerous PMs I have received laughing about how I have "owned Ogerz" in this thread?

I don't post on wrestling forums for any type of glamor or Internet fame. I could give a fuck less what people think about me and the way I post. I honestly do not care if someone feels I am a bully or I am a sheep. It matters not to me.

It seems to matter much more to you than it ever has to me. "almighty Sly being shown up by a nobbie"..."belittled me infront of the community". Where is this imaginary audience coming from?

Other than there being a little offtopic comments in my post defending myself from your arrogant attacks, I have been talking about Owen in everyone of my posts. It's not my fault that your in here talking about a wrestlers respect when you can't give it to me and respect my opinions or challenge them without Flaming or Attacking me.
*sigh*

Ok. Fine. Whatever you want to think. Now shut up about it, and talk about wrestling.

BTW, Don't even sit here and portray me as attacking you. ANYONE can read back and see it was YOU that started all of this crap. I guess you have yet to meet someone that will not back down. EVER.
Really? Is that so? I started this?

For anyone who wishes to read back and see where the personal attacks started, here are the links to each of our entire posts, up until the first personal attack, and the response afterwards.

Slyfox, Post 7 in thread: http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showpost.php?p=285347&postcount=7

Ogerz, Post 11: http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showpost.php?p=285507&postcount=11

Slyfox, Post 13: http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showpost.php?p=285934&postcount=13

Ogerz, Post 16: http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showpost.php?p=286100&postcount=16

Note in this post, where Ogerz very clearly says "Sly, LOL, you got issues bro". Personal attack.

Slyfox, Post 18: http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showpost.php?p=286238&postcount=18

Note in this post, where Slyfox calls Ogerz ignorant because he says HHH only got to be where he was because of Steph, despite HHH's 4 title reigns before he was with her.

So, who really started this?

You addressed me first. You made personal attacks first.

I'm willing to forget about all that, as your refusal to understand definitions of words is beginning to wear on me. If you wish to say anything else to me, about any attacks you feel I have made on you in this thread, do so in PM. I'll reply.

I'm asking that your next response be regarding Owen, and any sub-topic related to it. Leave the personal stuff for the PM.
 
This Slyfox vs. Ogerz debate is like taking candy from a baby, and Ogerz is the baby.

I've never understood why so many people think Owen Hart deserves so much respect. Sure, he was a good wrestler. But a legend? Come on. He's not even close to being a legend. After his feud with Bret ended, he was stuck in the midcard for the next 5 years until his death. Before he died, there was no indication at all that he was going to be getting a significant push anytime soon.

What exactly did he accomplish in his career that's so significant to label him a legend? One great feud and two great matches with Bret, IC Title, European Title, Tag Title, KOTR? That's not enough for me. And it's completely meaningless to say he would have done more if he didn't die. The fact is, he did die, and you have to base his legendary status on what he did accomplish, not on what he could have accomplished. Dying in the middle of the ring does not automatically make you a legend.

Overall, he

wasn't a draw,
was a midcarder for most of his career,
was never a World Champion,
had one memorable feud,
had two memorable matches,
had average mic skills,
had average charisma,
broke Austin's neck,
and had good wrestling ability.

Obviously Owen Hart deserves SOME respect, he was a talented wrestler. But he simply isn't a legend.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,834
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top