I wont bother quoting your whole post since you really didnt make any good points.
First off the Diva, Tag and mid card matches are boring, sloppy or uninteresting because WWE creative puts no effort into building these divisions. During the Attitude Era people cared about these divisions. So it doesnt help when Cole does nothing to promote these divisions with his commentary. Do you really think viewers care about Twitter during the Divas match or if Kofi and R-Truth are facing Ziggler/Swagger?
JR rarely botched, and when he did they were very minor mistakes. So the "he's only human" is a terrible defense to Cole's botches. JR would actually keep his focus on the actual match going on instead of trying to promote something else. In fact when do you really see other commentators botch as much as Cole does?
Why do think the Undertaker requested that JR call his match at Wrestlemania? Because Cole is fucking awful compared to a legend like JR. Why do you think that HBK-Taker II at WM 26 wasnt as good as the first match. Because Cole called the match where JR called the first one at WM 25. The majority of WWE fans hate Cole which is why Vince decided to make him into a heel.
Again, I do not care why the matches regarding divas, mid-carders, and thrown together tag matches are bad. They just are, no question. But the thing is like I said, what the hell can you commentate to try and make them sound exciting? Regal hasn't done that, Matt Strike can't do it. You can't. JR made them sound great because of his presentation and style. It's technically unprofessional, but for a place like WWE, it's perfect. Cole isn't made for a show like WWE, he's made for an actual and professional broadcast. He's very skillful in that scene, and those skills are what my entire post regards.
You say JR rarely botches, but when he does they are minor. Think about what you just said. You admitted he has botched before. Cole also botches, but they're not significant and game-changers. That is the human element I was saying in which you claimed as a terrible point. People will mess up at points, oh well. We move on.
"Cole should focus on the match instead of promoting something else". I remember a time, way back when, when Cole did do this. Yes, I remember he would always keep focus. This was also a time when WWE and Vince were not concerned with relating and staying modern with technology and social media. This was also a time where ratings were great, and the talent was exciting. Cole can do it if he wants to as he's proven, but don't you think he is being told to promote these other things at times? We all hate to see what's trending on Twitter, but think about it. Cole most likely does not have his computer logged onto Twitter mid-match to see what's trending. He's being told this.
So the second match wasn't as good because Cole commentated it? It wasn't because it was a replica of the year before when they first delivered one of the most exciting matches in recent history? Like I said before. Cole is good. People would like him, but he's always and only compared to JR. Compare Cole and Booker T. Oh yeah, nobody does that. JR is a legend, but that's because of his delivery and style. He's not really that talented or great at the actual commentating, but he's entertaining and is what is perfect for WWE. Cole is more of an actual commentator. He's really not made for WWE. But that's not my point. My point is saying that he is actually good at commentating, just isn't made for a show like WWE.