Raw 8/31/09 LD, featuring Cody's Dad | Page 8 | WrestleZone Forums

Raw 8/31/09 LD, featuring Cody's Dad

It's called rhetoric. Answering a question with a question that itself shows the weakness in the original question. I know Gail Kim has had no major feuds, and that was implied by your question. I read between the lines, and skipped to the next question. You see what you did was ask a weak question, because no divas have major feuds. What you did, philosophically, is called begging the question. It means you did a bad.


Okay. Good. You are acknowledging that all 4 of those Divas you brought up were given prominent feuds and mic time to get themselves over ... something Gail Kim has not been given either of. Thank you for proving my point and finally answering the question.

Now, onto Maria and Kelly Kelly.

Maria has been in angles before. She is also in one right now with Dolph Ziggler as the naive girlfriend who is being cheated on. Maria was also given the Kiss Cam segment which originally got her over with the WWE audience. When has Gail Kim been given an opportunity to host a WWE segment?

As far as Kelly Kelly, she was given a weekly segment on ECW TV called Extreme Expose ... and was involved with angles with Mike Knox (abusive relationship) as well as an angle with Randy Orton.

Now, we've already established that Gail Kim has not been involved in any feuds. Now, how many angles, storylines, or weekly segments has Gail Kim been involved in to help introduce her personality to the audience?

How many times has Gail Kim spoken on the mic since even being in WWE?
 
That was a prety good segment implying that the ratings in the WWF went up when Shawn left cuz of his injury; lol actually the week he left after, the day after WM (and shawn michaels dropped the ball) and when x-pac joined DX is when RAW won their first ratings head to head
 
To be fair to HBK, there was no one that was going to stop Hogan and the NWO. Anyone would ahve failed just as badly.
 
See, actually it does since i'm on staff. You treating people like they're beneath you does concern me, and you'll either chill or be infracted. You're no different than anyone else here no matter how smart you are.

It has nothing to do with "treating people as if they are below me". He repeatedly kept asking me and getting frustrated with why I wasn't answering his questions, and all I did was tell him why I wasn't answering his questions. That isn't flaming or anything like that, as I am not ridiculing him, calling him names, attacking him, or anything of the sort.
 
It has nothing to do with "treating people as if they are below me". He repeatedly kept asking me and getting frustrated with why I wasn't answering his questions, and all I did was tell him why I wasn't answering his questions. That isn't flaming or anything like that, as I am not ridiculing him, calling him names, attacking him, or anything of the sort.

The debating/questioning both ways is fine. Just don't tell someone what to say/do and everything is fine. That's all I ask.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top