Randy Orton Then vs. Dolph Ziggler Now

juggalotus

Whoop whoop!
Let's compare two people with similar personalities, but different gimmicks. Back in around 2006-07ish, Randy Orton was coming to the end of his legend killer gimmick. He was a brash, cocky heel that had beaten the best, and thought it made him better than the best. Now Dolph Ziggler is playing his own cocky heel role. He's oozing confidence as #heel and a showoff. He can out perform anyone else, and thinks its making him better than the best.
Who pulled off the cocky heel better?
 
I'd personally say that Orton was the better heel, but that's considering the age I was when he played that character.

Since it's my personal preference, I was extremely emotionally invested in wrestling when Orton was with Rated-RKO back in late 2006 and 2007. I hated the hell out of Edge and him more than I ever have loathed a tag team even to this day. It wasn't because I thought they sucked it was due to the fact that they were brilliant heels. Also take into account that Orton played the role much longer than Ziggler currently has, so Dolph hasn't had the same amount of time to play this character and really have some great moments as the output. Orton didn't need Vickie, he got over by himself and didn't overplay it as Dolph has. When you take a closer look at it, Ziggler screams "I'm the best" or something similar to that multiple times on a weekly basis, Orton said maybe once a show and let his actions do the rest of the talking. It males Ziggler look like he is beyond absolute obsession with his ability.

However the biggest factor that has kept Ziggler from being as good as Randy was in terms of being a cocky heel in my eyes, is me. Like I said I was very emotionally invested in WWE when Orton was the cocky heel, now that Ziggler is getting a run with it I no longer get to emotional since I have a greater knowledge on wrestling in general. Don't get me wrong Dolph is currently doing a superb job at being an arrogant heel right now, but he doesn't get the same reaction out of me that Orton did, that's not his fault though.

I go with Orton on this one, but who knows maybe Ziggler in the end will be the greater heel as time passes.
 
Evolution made RKO's career accelerate to where he is now, Dolph doesn't have that luxury, he's grouping with Jack Swthwagger and Vickie, not Ric and Trips.
This may seem a little irrelevant, but the evolution story made me CARE a lot about Randy, and in my eyes, I didn't give a crap about Ziggler until a few months ago when he's started putting on 4*+ matches with the best. Ziggler needs something to make the casual fan care about him, because let's be real, those average fans aren't watching the matches, they're just watching the soapopera going on around the stars and seeing a less perfect Mr. Perfect.

Ziggler is growing on me, at a much slower pace than Randy did, but Ziggler has a very good chance in 2012 to make his legacy. (pun intended)

Randy wins this one, but it's because of his work with Evolution, and his heritage, when RKO showed up, we knew he was destined to be good, Ziggles at the same point in his career was NICKY!!!!!!, and that seriously hurt him for anyone who remembers, bad gimmicks follow.

Ask this question again in 12 months, and I think it will be a much more fair one, we've still yet to see how cocky and arrogant he is, and how far it can take him.
 
I'll go with Orton for now but Ziggler has a legit shot to take the spot away.

One of the things I think helps is Orton had been built up as this 3rd generation star with wrestling in his genes and he played that almost to perfection
 
Orton in Evolution was raw talent and potential personified. He always had the corporate machine behind him and even shitting in Divas' suitcases couldn't take him out of it.

Ziggler had to work for this spot and literally had to rip the spotlight away from the main event in the last couple of years. He grew tremendously as a worker thanks to Rey Mysterio and his recent opponents.

Being a cocky heel isnt enough. At this point in their careers, they were quite different characters. But Randy was better, you could see he had "it". Ziggler is only just beginning to show it
 
Randy had way more exposure than Dolph has had so far. In my opinion Dolph is more entertaining, better on the mic, leaps and bounds above Orton as a worker and we have not seen the best of him. I also really like his showoff gimmick. The only thing Randy has over Dolph is his size which allows him to compete with bigger guys in a realistic fashion.
 
I'm going to go out on a limb, or at least I feel like I'm on a limb, and say Dolph.

You can call me a prisoner of the moment, if you want, but I'm becoming a pretty big fan of Dolph Ziggler. I'm not sure if I believe that Dolph is ready for a title run, but he's definitely put his work in over the last two years and has proven that he has lasting power.

Right now, I think Dolph is a trademark moment away from being a main player. I've always thought that he was one Cena feud away from being a top heel, and now I think he's one Cena feud away from being a big star. I love his new show-off gimmick. He's still a Mr. Perfect clone, but I think he's put his own spin on it. Instead of acting like a world class athlete, he does ab crunches under your dazed body. The bravado Dolph exudes is just great. Honestly, it kind of reminds me of Ric Flair, but in a more genuine way than say, Miz. He could even ditch Vickie and be a show-off by maybe taking other wrestlers' girlfriends away. I mean, it'd be a creative way to turn Eve heel and then Dolph v Ryder could be one of those, "make each other," feuds.

Fantasy booking aside, I do really love Ziggler's character. He's brash, he's still young, and it plays into his natural abilities greatly.

------------------------------------------------------

I might be a little biased against Orton, though, because I didn't like the Legend Killer gimmick. It worked, but I thought that it was too easy.

"Hey, how we fast-track Randy into the main event?"
"I know! Let's strap him with a gimmick where he seeks to destroy anyone who's a legend! Triple H is a legend, Ric Flair is a legend, Mick Foley is a legend, we can always bring previous legends back...we'll call him the LEGEND KILLER!"

It was a smart idea for a young, green talent who didn't have great storytelling abilities, I just disliked the lack of personality.

Right now, I think Dolph has a personality. It comes across on the mic, though he seems a little more constricted in the situation, but he's definitely found his niche. I thought Orton was a project, in his early days. He's finally at a point where I feel like he has an identity. The Viper days were a better foundation for who he was to become. If we're talking about the Viper gimmick, then yeah, I'd probably take Orton.

But, Show-Off v Legend Killer? I'll firmly stand behind Dolph, in that argument.
 
I really like Dolphs work. I think he is one of the better heels on the roster right now and could go on to be the number one heel in the company. I think his potential is far higher than Ortons, but then in all honestly, I just don't like Randy Orton and his matches have never really entertained me a great deal - except for the way he has laid down for some good up and comers, but then he buried basically the entire roster this week saying how there is no-one he is interested in fighting anymore and that he has 15 world titles in him still. I say if there is no-one he wants to fight at Wrestlemania then don't put him on the card. Let him miss out on the pay day flat out. Mania this year is damn near guaranteed a million buys. No-one will miss Orton if he is absent. (went off on one a bit there but I really am not a fan of "The Viper")
 
Dolph has become one of my favorite wrestlers...the new show off gimic works...he is in better shape than cm punk...has a unique character down to the way he speaks and cuts promos...he is very believable and the fans know it...dolph has surpassed my expectations of him...even with jericho back on raw he still hasnt lost his spot. Dolph is the future and his work with zack ryder helped his career allot more than it hurt him.
 
Big fans of both of them. But Orton wins this by far. The Rated RKO stuff was better than anything Dolph has done. Your right they were both cocky but were different. Orton was more of a cocky scumbag and Ziggler currently is a cocky showoff.
 
Not gonna have the popular opinion here but Ziggler is very overrated in my opinion. Almost as much as Zack Ryder. From what we have seen so far it seems to me that Ziggler is only slightly above average wrestling skill wise at best, nothing special on the mic I don't see what people are talking about when they say he is good on the mic and he has been forced down our throats for the past few months even to the point of having a fake WWE title reign for one night until the Count Out=Current Champ Keeps Belt came into play. I am honestly sick of seeing this guy in places and positions he shouldn't be in on shows. So If the answer wasn't obvious Orton was the better cocky heel. He didn't have a generic cardboard personality that all WWE non-gimmick heels seem to have nowadays including Ziggler.
 
I'm sorry, BRP, but I find it laughable that you say Ziggler is slightly above average, having seen him hang with the best WWE has to offer, and call him overrated, but you list Mark Henry and Kane as two of your favorites.

In any case, you have to go with Randy Orton on the original question. But only based on the fact that he had the massive exposure, and he got to be linked to a legend in Ric Flair and a legend in the making in Triple H. That was an advantage for a young Orton, at the time.

Dolph Ziggler doesn't have that sort of advantage. He's earned his spot the old fashioned way -- Outperforming other wrestlers and showing off what he can truly do. He can really only go up from here. Could he become a better heel than Randy Orton was? Absolutely. But will he? Only time will tell.
 
Its a really tough call for me. Randy was one of my favorites back then when I first started getting into wrestling. I loved the feuds he had with Undertaker and his matches against Benoit as a substitute for Booker. I loved his smugness. But on the other hand, Dolph has a special place in my wrestling heart because I went to the same high school as him, so its a lot easier for me to get into his matches and promos. I think I'm going to lean a tiny bit to Orton back then, but if it was current Orton vs. current Ziggler, I'm going with Ziggles.
 
It is way too early to compare Dolph's "show off" gimmick with Orton's "Legend Killer" gimmick. Though Dolph has certainly exhibited traits of his "show off" gimmick in the past, he has only been fully invested to the gimmick for about two months.

Now, if we're comparing Dolph in the past year to Orton during his legend killer days, then I have to give the nod to Orton in a landslide. I know Dolph is the flavor of the month in the IWC, but can someone PLEASE tell me ONE memorable Dolph Ziggler moment.

I don't want to hear about how he has improved on the mic -or how he is a top-notch performer in the ring ... I want a memorable moment, something that made him stand out to the average fan. All stars have those moments ... Orton's legend killer had those moments ... Ziggler doesn't have any yet. I'm not saying he won't have them in the future, I'm just saying that he doesn't have them yet.
 
It is way too early to compare Dolph's "show off" gimmick with Orton's "Legend Killer" gimmick. Though Dolph has certainly exhibited traits of his "show off" gimmick in the past, he has only been fully invested to the gimmick for about two months.

Now, if we're comparing Dolph in the past year to Orton during his legend killer days, then I have to give the nod to Orton in a landslide. I know Dolph is the flavor of the month in the IWC, but can someone PLEASE tell me ONE memorable Dolph Ziggler moment.

I don't want to hear about how he has improved on the mic -or how he is a top-notch performer in the ring ... I want a memorable moment, something that made him stand out to the average fan. All stars have those moments ... Orton's legend killer had those moments ... Ziggler doesn't have any yet. I'm not saying he won't have them in the future, I'm just saying that he doesn't have them yet.

Yeah I thought the op was just talking about Orton year in 2006. But if you include the legend killer stuff. Ziggler is not even close. Orton had a ton of memorable moments back when he was a midcarder. Great feuds with guys like Foley, Undertaker etc. Summerslam 04 with Benoit.

Ziggler has not really done anything memorable so far. His 5 minute run as champ? I dont think you can compare his midcard run to Orton's.

IMO Ziggler is getting really close to becoming a main eventer. He just needs that one memorable feud to help get him to the next level.

It is kind of funny how they are the same age. I give Ziggler credit for bouncing back from the spirit squad.
 
I honestly liked the Ziggler when he was a goofy heel, before his current cocky gimmick. Because it doesn't make him stand out as much anymore.

Orton plays a better arrogant gimmick even before he wa in Evolution, then once he was in Evolution he just became 2x better.
 
I think it's hard to answer because of the change in programming.

Obviously, Orton is a future HOF'er and a 9 time world champion and a top guy in the company, so he is going to win this question.

What I would say is, how over could Dolph Ziggler be if the TV wasn't so PG and Ziggler could brutalise from top faces the way Orton was allowed to back in the day....
 
I think you have your years a little mixed up to make a fair comparison, but I still like the idea of this thread. Dolph Ziggler has only just now started his third real year as a WWE Superstar (I'm not counting his work in Spirit Squad). By 2006/7 Orton was already out of the Legend Killer gimmick, done with Evolution, and had multiple World title victories under his belt. To try and match Ziggler up with that is a bit ridiculous and unfair, in my opinion. Ironically enough, if you took Orton's career and looked at it in the same position as ZIggler is RIGHT NOW, he was about to win his first World Heavyweight title. Many believe Ziggler is on the verge of capturing the World title gold within the next a few months of WrestleMania (if not this weekend!), so that would actually put him right on track in your comparison with Orton! Nice observation, just off by about two years...

So let's compare the 2005 Randy Orton, about to win the World title from Chris Benoit and break out of Evolution...with modern day Dolph Ziggler, who for the second year in a row will battle for a World title at the Royal Rumble.

If we look at pure accomplishments, Orton has this by a landslide. It's nothing against Ziggler, but they gave Orton the greatest rookie push wrestling has EVER seen. Who else can say they were matched up will all the great legends from WWE's long history, and came out on the victorious end almost every single time? The Legend Killer gimmick was just pure brilliance, and without Orton would be nowhere near as popular as he is right now. Now, Ziggler has also done some impressive work. His feud last year with Edge was excellent, and his current work with CM Punk has been almost flawless. But unfortunately, Ziggler just hasn't been given that star treatment and insane push that Orton was granted upon his arrival.

As an in-ring worker, Ziggler wins the contest in my opinion. Trained by Lance Storm, one of wrestling's best trainers (and the guy that helped Jericho become as great as he is), he's probably the third best ring worker currently in WWE, after Punk and Jericho. Orton is great, and if we were comparing both men by today's standards it would be a much closer story. I know many would disagree and say Orton is mechanical and boring, but there is a lot to say about his intensity and how much of a reaction he draws from the crowd... Still, Ziggler takes the in-ring catagory.

In terms of mic ability, I also have to go with ZIggler. He just seems so natural at it, and while he's had his rough patches he's also worked through them and become one of my favorite promo guys to come around in a long time. Orton's early mic work was a bit awkward, and something Evolution definitely helped him with. But he's still just not naturally charismatic in his promo ability. In the ring, and with his look...totally! The Viper oozes charisma as a character, but he just doesn't do it for me when he opens his mouth.

So Ziggler's a better worker and promo man than 2005 Orton. But 2005 Orton had a way better gimmick and had already accomplished things ZIggler very well may never (like getting to face the Undertaker in the Cell)... I guess the only thing it comes down to is the original question the OP asked: who's the better heel? I think part of being a good heel is definitely your ring psychology, and largely your mic work. But at the end of the day it all comes down to the amount of heat you can draw. It's why managers like Vickie Guerrero, Teddy Hart, and Bobby Heenan are the greatest heels of all time. They draw such immense heat and that is what makes matches hot, which ultimately transitions into how we view wrestler's ring-work. It's true that if you are THAT good at the art of promo giving, you can manufacture that heel heat at the snap of your fingers. But Ziggler isn't at that level yet.

I have to go with Randy Orton as the better heel. Because of his gimmick, he was universally hated. Do you remember when he spit in Mick Foley's face, and FOley humbled himself and walked out of the building? I remember literally HATING Randy Orton at that point. I remember my brother's friend, who is quite a bit younger, got into wrestling during the Orton/Triple H feud. When he cuffed Triple H to the ropes and dropped STephanie, my brother's friend went NUTS! His rage at Orton was hilarious! When a fan can scream at the TV in anger and develop genuine emotion against a heel, THAT is the sign of a truly great performer. As much as I LOVE Dolph Ziggler...that's part of the problem. If he's a heel, I shouldn't love him. I shouldn't beg for him to come out and entertain me, I should hate his guts! Orton did that, and while a lot of it was the creative team and mentors like Triple H and Flair, some of that was genuinely Orton's character. Orton is just a much more natural heel, and it's the reason I can't truly buy into his current top face of Smackdown. I just want to see him kick somebody's head off....

2005, or 2012...I have to go with Randy Orton, as much as it pains me to do so.
 
One thing that comes to mind when discussing this thread, is a comment made by Batista awhile ago. Batista said that it's difficult for the WWE for put over wrestlers nowadays because to become a champion, wrestlers used to go through hell to get titles. Guys like The Rock, Angle and Stone Cold beat each other to seemingly their final fibre to win champions, the kind of matches that you just don't see these days. It made them look tougher and put them on extremely high pedestals.

Ziggler is awesome, but Orton got over when he was younger by taking on guys like Foley and Undertaker in hardcore matches, and when Orton walked away from these matches bloodied up either winning or taking his opponent to the limit, he looked like he belonged up there. His matches were memorable. When his Hall of Fame induction video plays one day, it will most like feature his matches with Foley, Taker, HHH, etc, even his rko to Hogan because they're so memorable.

Ziggler hasn't had this, and although he is consistently taking on the best in the company, he just hasn't had that feud or that title reign which makes him look like he belongs in the elite of the company, not just of his era, but up there with high competitors of all eras.

It's not just Ziggler though, people don't get on board with alot of new superstars because they look weaker in comparison to alot of the new guys that went through hell to win championships.

Anyway, so in terms of comparing the Ziggler of today with the Orton of 2003-2007, you'd have to go with Randy on this one. Orton had the advantage of being brought into the business with Flair and HHH, and he had much greater opportunities then Ziggler has had. He was the last superstar in the WWE to take on Hogan on a WWE stage!

Plus, back then the whole smug & arrogant/cocky gimmick wasn't as popular, and when used it was rarely pulled off well, yet Orton turned it into something HUGE. Randy had this natural smugness to him which got him over. He was tall, in great shape, he was handsome, and he didn't have to try as hard as Ziggler to let the audience know that he was smug, where as Orton could look like a smug d***head just by walking with his arms by his side.

If Zigglers push keeps on going, and Ziggler keeps up the good work, I certainly believe that by this time next year he will be consistently participating in World title matches/become one of the biggest stars of the last 3-5 years.
 
I'm sorry, BRP, but I find it laughable that you say Ziggler is slightly above average, having seen him hang with the best WWE has to offer, and call him overrated, but you list Mark Henry and Kane as two of your favorites.

In any case, you have to go with Randy Orton on the original question. But only based on the fact that he had the massive exposure, and he got to be linked to a legend in Ric Flair and a legend in the making in Triple H. That was an advantage for a young Orton, at the time.

Dolph Ziggler doesn't have that sort of advantage. He's earned his spot the old fashioned way -- Outperforming other wrestlers and showing off what he can truly do. He can really only go up from here. Could he become a better heel than Randy Orton was? Absolutely. But will he? Only time will tell.

I never said Kane & Mark Henry were the best wrestlers in the world. Their not but what makes them my favorites is their characters are really original and both men portray their characters well. Maybe I should have made this more clear but my main gripe with Ziggler isn't his slightly above average wrestling skills it's his weak paper-thin carboard generic heel character
 
I totally agree that Orton was given one of the hardest pushes ever given in the WWE, while Ziggler has had to put over the woo woo kid. In terms of playing the heel i think randy just had it, he's the first to say how much of an ass he was back in those day's, while Ziggler is definitely making progress as the show off it's not as natural to him. Personally i never understood all the hate Orton gets from the iwc his in ring ability has always been incredible for a man of his stature, especially during his legend killer run (before he limited his moveset) yet he is never mentioned in the same breath as Punk, Bryan or Dolph. So i'm gonna have to go with Randy on this one but throw Dolph a decent feud and the show off will take the WWE by storm.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,849
Messages
3,300,882
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top