Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Why on earth does Triple H need to beat Cena, Punk, and Del Rio? He's already beaten the first two, first of all. But beyond that, what purpose would that serve? He's now in the role of an authority figure who wrestles occasionally, and that's where he should stay. Having him go on another dominant title reign as a face would serve no purpose and would be counter productive in every possible way. I could accept if he was a heel constantly screwing Punk over, but as a face winning cleanly all the time? No.
I wouldn't necessarily mind another Kane run, but ultimately, what would it accomplish? You have people like Orton and Christian on SmackDown, who have been consistently delivering week after week (not to mention Sheamus who's been fantastic), and you're going to give the belt to a guy who's not that good in the ring and isn't far off from retirement? Furthermore, who would he even feud with? His last reign worked because it revolved around him and The Undertaker. Kane's character isn't really the type to be champion for a long time.Some of you are missing the point of the thread. If someone wants a another Triple H reign then so be it. Argue that he doesn't need it rather then the time isn't right for it. No one said he needs to win the title tomorrow and defend it for months on end. Same with Kane, just because he won the title in 2010 doesn't mean he can't win it again. Seriously? That should be the goal of every active Superstar. There's nothing wrong with a vet holding a top title. When you look at Kane's last run, many would consider it to be very successful. What's the harm in trying that again? Nothing.