Now first off, I would like tp point out that my personal opinion on wrestlers, is that I respect them if they are dedicated to the business (that's apart of it anyway). I have come to realise that wrestlers mean that they are really enjoying and bringing everything they can to what they do when they come from behind the curtains and entertain us week in week out.
Which brings me to my point, if a superstar doesn't have passion, does he deserve to get pushed?
For example, a superstar like John Morrison. A star who I used to think was the shit, but now not so much. I remember hearing on ECW one week Matt Striker (or Grish) saying something along the lines of 'having lots of extra cirricular activities, but he finds time in his busy schedule to come here to ECW every week'. Now, that can easily imply that Morrison, while likes the business doens't have the straight out want to do it. Also you can look at his push, it isn't there, and most of the IWC says he has all the talent in the world to go ahead and become and major star. But the fact remains he isn't really dedicated to the business, and that seems to be showing on his push.
On the flip side of that, we have - wait for it - John Cena. Known as one of the most dedicated stars in the history of the WWE. Totally clean, and a representative of what the WWE stands for: Dedication, entertainment - giving up their lives to do it, and a fantastic worker in all areas. Look where he is (err, ignoring the current injurt status): Main Event superstar, a star who still has alot left in his career before he has to retire, a guy who already in his career has acheived more than many others will ever get.
In my opinion, passions matters. Not only does it help with the work ethic of the star, but you know they aren't just doing it because they can. I would give so much to be able to do what they do, because I love wrestling. Because I love wresting so much, I'd like to think the stars do as well - to be honest, I'd be pretty sick knowing some stars just do it because they have the ability to, even if they don't really care.
If you look at the Morrison/Cena situation, it looks like the staff care for dedication as well.
Which brings me to my point, if a superstar doesn't have passion, does he deserve to get pushed?
For example, a superstar like John Morrison. A star who I used to think was the shit, but now not so much. I remember hearing on ECW one week Matt Striker (or Grish) saying something along the lines of 'having lots of extra cirricular activities, but he finds time in his busy schedule to come here to ECW every week'. Now, that can easily imply that Morrison, while likes the business doens't have the straight out want to do it. Also you can look at his push, it isn't there, and most of the IWC says he has all the talent in the world to go ahead and become and major star. But the fact remains he isn't really dedicated to the business, and that seems to be showing on his push.
On the flip side of that, we have - wait for it - John Cena. Known as one of the most dedicated stars in the history of the WWE. Totally clean, and a representative of what the WWE stands for: Dedication, entertainment - giving up their lives to do it, and a fantastic worker in all areas. Look where he is (err, ignoring the current injurt status): Main Event superstar, a star who still has alot left in his career before he has to retire, a guy who already in his career has acheived more than many others will ever get.
In my opinion, passions matters. Not only does it help with the work ethic of the star, but you know they aren't just doing it because they can. I would give so much to be able to do what they do, because I love wrestling. Because I love wresting so much, I'd like to think the stars do as well - to be honest, I'd be pretty sick knowing some stars just do it because they have the ability to, even if they don't really care.
If you look at the Morrison/Cena situation, it looks like the staff care for dedication as well.