Why are so many people convinced that Batista is going to win the title tonight? It doesn't make any sense in my mind.
First off, the feud is primarily Edge/Taker. They used Batista because they needed to have someone challenge Edge at Night of Champions as every title is defended, and the Undertaker is "banned" from the WWE. So they go to their #2 guy, Batista, as he was the last option left considering Mysterio's injury.
Second, Edge JUST won the title back at the last ppv. Why have him lose it already to someone who hasn't been involved in the storyline?
Third, they're still pushing the July 11th wedding. Why would they have Edge lose his title and kill all the momentum leading to the wedding? If he loses it at any time, expect it to be at least at the Great American Bash, but more likely at Summerslam.
Fourth, I know most people will say "because Raw needs a title and Batista's on Raw, and HHH won't want to lose his". But remember, Batista isn't as big of a money maker as Cena is, and if the rumor is true, then they were planning on having Cena beat HHH at Summerslam but decided to move it up to Night of Champions (which would mean "we decided to move up Cena's title reign to start at Night of Champions instead of Summerslam"). Now I'm not a fan of Cena at all, and I think HHH is bland too, but one can't really argue that Batista is by far the worst out of the threesome.
Edge as the top man on Smackdown is receiving a ton of heat. Are they really going to just end it because they'd rather have Batista as WHC on Raw than Cena as WWE champ on Raw? Come on. That's like saying "Matt Hardy was moved to ECW so that he could challenge Edge, beat him, bring the WHC to ECW, and then when the merger happens, bring it to Raw"...wishful thinking on the part of a fan of a particular person (this time being Batista) and not stepping back and seeing that the WWE is a business.