MLB 2014 Hall Of Fame Ballot

The Brain

King Of The Ring
Today the 2014 MLB Hall of Fame ballot was released and it’s getting awfully crowded. Writers are allowed to vote for up to ten players and usually that’s way more than necessary but with so many worthy candidates snubbed last year ten votes may actually not be enough anymore. There are 36 names on the ballot this year and a strong case can be made for more than half the candidates. Here’s the list

Craig Biggio
Jack Morris
Jeff Bagwell
Mike Piazza
Time Raines
Lee Smith
Curt Schilling
Barry Bonds
Roger Clemens
Edgar Martinez
Alan Trammell
Larry Walker
Fred McGriff
Mark McGwire
Don Mattingly
Sammy Sosa
Rafael Palmeiro
Greg Maddux
Frank Thomas
Mike Mussina
Tom Glavine
Jeff Kent
Kenny Rogers
Luis Gonzalez
Moises Alou
Ray Durham
Hideo Nomo
Richie Sexson
Paul Lo Duca
Armando Benitez
Mike Timlin
Sean Casey
Jacque Jones
Eric Gagne
JT Snow
Todd Jones

That’s quite a list. If you were a voter which players would you vote for? Which players do you think will get voted in? Who are the borderline players?
 
Normally there are two or three names I would vote for but this year I would use the full ten votes. Here are my picks

Craig Biggio
Jeff Bagwell
Mike Piazza
Roger Clemens
Barry Bonds
Sammy Sosa
Rafael Palmeiro
Greg Maddux
Frank Thomas
Tom Glavine

Steroid allegations aside these players dominated the 90s and first half of the 00s. Fred McGriff is someone I usually support and I don’t know why he always gets so little votes but with all the big names on the ballot this year I had to leave the Crime Dog off my top ten. Same goes for Mark McGwire.

Mike Mussina, Curt Schilling, Edgar Martinez, and Larry Walker are guys I consider to be borderline candidates. Tim Raines, Jack Morris, Jeff Kent and Alan Trammell get a lot of support from analysts on various shows but I don’t see any of them as Hall of Famers. Lee Smith and Don Mattingly will get their usual support but still fall well short of induction. Moises Alou and Luis Gonzalez are guys I see hovering right around that minimum 5% to remain on the ballot but will probably fall off within a couple years. I don’t see any others returning to the ballot next year.

These are the guys I see actually getting voted in

Greg Maddux
Tom Glavine
Craig Biggio

I think Biggio is considered to be a clean player and just had the unfortunate timing of coming on the ballot the same year as some of the most notorious alleged steroid users. A statement was made with no one getting elected last year but I think Biggio gets the vote this year. I think Maddux and Glavine are also considered clean and for them to dominate as much as they did during a time when offensive numbers were off the charts will be given high consideration among the voters. The rest of the guys on my list will probably still have to wait a little while before getting the call, with some likely never to get it. I think Piazza will move up and maybe Bagwell too. Bonds and Clemens will probably gain a little ground but not much. I don’t expect Sosa and Palmeiro to move much. Frank Thomas should get in on the first ballot but judging by what happened last year and his time spent as a DH I’m not sure he’ll make it. I’m just glad players get 15 years on the ballot so the wounds of the steroid era have time to heel and they have plenty of time to take their rightful spot in the HOF.
 
ESPN ran their poll a few days back and apparently only 70% of the people who voted actually voted Maddux in. The BBWAA requires a 75% vote to have someone elected, so by that measure he wouldn't get it. I can't wrap my head around that at all. Maddux was a 300 game winner, a member of the 3,000 strikeout club, and won 18 gold gloves. How can you look at those numbers and say he isn't a HOFer. Is it because he wore glasses when he wasn't pitching? Was it because he had a physique that looked like he never hit the gym? Was it because he rarely hit 90mph on the radar gun?

That rant over, I think Glavine and Maddux both get in this year, and I suspect Biggio will as well. It was crazy to keep him off last year. As far as a few of the other guys I think will get in/be close over the course of their candidacy


Jack Morris- Morris is an interesting case. He had pretty good numbers. He has 250+ wins in his career, was a 5x All-Star, a 4x World Series Champion, and was just shy of 2,500 strikeouts. This will be his last year of eligibility and he has hovered in the mid 60%, so unless a bunch of voters suddenly feel sympathetic to his cause, I doubt he gets in

Jeff Bagwell- I think if Bags had played in any other era he would get much stronger consideration. He seems clean, he went through the natural progression of slowing down late in his career. He put up solid numbers for a slugger, 400+ HRs, 2000+ hits, and a career batting average just shy of 300. Had he not retired at 37 and stuck around a couple more years to chase #500 I think he would get in sooner, but as it stands I don't see him getting in for a few more years.

Mike Piazza- Piazza put up pretty similar numbers to Bagwell, but he did it from the catcher position instead of first base. He extended his career by moving to the AL and getting to DH, which I think will hurt his cause a little. The bias toward DHs is evident, but I think he will get in within the next couple of years, as he was arguably the best hitting catcher not named Bench.

Tim Raines- Raines has been getting more and more support in recent years, which is fine by me. Raines was a very good contact hitter and a demon on the base paths, but he had such a short prime that it caused him to fall short of the milestone numbers most guys view as automatic for a plaque in Cooperstown. I've heard stories that his drug use is something that a fair amount of BBWAA writers hold against him, so that could very well be delaying his induction.

Lee Smith- Plain and simple, I don't think Smith will ever get in. Had his career taken place ten years later I think he would get much more consideration, but he was really the first dominant one inning closer, so he didn't have many peers to compare him to. I have a feeling that once the great closers of recent years like Rivera and Hoffman get their nods(and truthfully they both deserve it) Smith will be talked about as a guy who should have gotten a nod as well.

Curt Schilling-By his own admission, Schilling isn't a HOFer, as he feels his early years weren't good enough, and I tend to agree. Aside from a great year in '92 at the age of 25, he didn't come into his own as a truly dominant pitcher until he hit his 30s. There is the potential for his postseason heroics with Arizona and Boston to carry him in eventually, but he is one of the guys I would place in the Hall of Very Good, not the Hall of Fame.

Edgar Martinez- I think Edgar should be in, 2200+ hits, 500+ doubles, 300+ HRs, 1200+ RBIs, a career .312 average, two batting titles, and he drew more walks than he struck out in his career. Those are the numbers of a great hitter, and he did it all in one city. You could argue that since Edgar was a DH most of his career he should have put up more impressive numbers at the plate, which is why I think it will take a few years, but for Gar to not get in would be crazy.

Alan Trammell
- Trammell is an odd case, as I don't think his numbers alone get him in, but his work in the field gives him a boost. He has solid numbers for a SS, 2200+ hits and 1000+ RBIs, but injuries hindered the middle part of his career. A lot of sabermetric guys are high on him, Bill James going so far as to call him the 9th best shortstop to ever play the game, but I just can't see him getting in, though if he did he wouldn't be the worst pick.

Larry Walker-Walker is a guy, who like Schilling, was a solid but unspectacular player until he hit age 30. He won seven gold gloves, three batting titles, and an MVP award in his career, as well as putting up good numbers, similar to other guys I've listed, but his real breakout years didn't happen until he hit 30, which was around the time he started playing in Colorado. I think he deserves to be praised as one of the best pure hitters of his time, I don't think he will get the call.

Fred McGriff- I think McGriff should get in for his nickname alone, Crimedog. I'm biased because I grew up with him on the Braves, but I think he should get in. He finished his career seven home runs shy of 500, ten hits shy of 2500, nine doubles shy of 450, and 1550 RBIs. Sadly that was the story of McGriff's career, coming of just short, and I think that will be the story of his candidacy as well.

Frank Thomas- Speaking of 500 home runs, Thomas should get in. I doubt he gets in on the first ballot, but look at his career numbers and tell me he doesn't get in within three years. 2400 hits, 495 doubles, 521 HRs, 1700 RBIs, 300 more walks than strikeouts, a .300 average, 2x MVPs and a batting title. On top of all that, he was regarded as a clean player, speaking out against steroids as far back as '95.

Jeff Kent- Aside from having arguably the best porn star mustache in my lifetime, you can argue Kent was the best second baseman of his generation. He won the MVP in 2000, playing on the same team as Barry Bonds. He and Bonds played together for six years and it was prolific for Kent. In his career he ended up with 2400+ hits, 560 doubles, 377 HRs(351 of which came while playing 2nd, giving him the most all time), and 1500+ RBIs. He isn't without knocks. For a second baseman he had virtually no speed, and he was a very supbar fielder, which only got worse when he was switched to third late in his career. He also struck out nearly twice as many times as he walked in his career, but despite those drawback I think he will get in, and he likely gets in before Bonds.

Mike Mussina-Moose ended his career with 270 wins, and 2800+ strikeouts, and only twice in his 18 year career did he have a losing record as a pitcher. He was the definition of consistent, and unlike a lot of guys he retired on top. At 39 he had just become the oldest pitcher to win 20 games, then he called it quits. I think had he have stuck around another year or two to reach the 300, 3000 mark he would be guaranteed on his first ballot, but as it stands I think it will take three or four years.

Sean Casey- I wanted to give a special mention to Casey because if you picked HOFers based on their personality, Casey would get in a thousand times over. He had a six year stretch to begin his career where he was one of the best non power hitting first basemen in the game, but injuries derailed his career. Cincinnati did recognize him by inducting him into the team HOF, but sadly we will never get into the actual HOF.
 
I'm a big WAR guy, and so most of my decisions will hinge on WAR. Obviously the stat has some flaws (such as it being calculated 3 different ways), but it's the best one-sum stat in baseball. With that disclaimer, here would be my choices:

Maddux
Glavine
Thomas
Bonds
Clemens
Trammell
Schilling
Biggio

All of those guys have a career WAR of at least 64 (with I believe 60ish being around the average for a HOFer). I'm not big on punishing guys like Clemens and Bonds for roiding it up because a) that was just the era and guys like Mays and Aaron used greenies during their time and that's an illegal drug now and b) they were great before they were suspected of juicing. I couldn't care less that they were assholes off the field either. Ty Cobb was a racist son of a bitch and he made it the first year (as he should've).

Individually speaking, Glavine, Maddux, and Biggio seem like locks to me. Biggio probably (unfairly or not) was punished last year due to going in the same year as the steroid users and the fact that he was a good but not great second baseman. Especially when you compare him to say Lou Whitaker, who was unjustly knocked off the ballot his first year with only 2.4% (had this vote happened 10 years later the online community would've went apeshit on the voters for that). Despite me feeling he was more 'good' than 'great', he's got 3000 hits, which is always a nice stat to point towards the voters.

Bonds and Clemens I feel were two of the 5 best players of their era (if not the top at both position and pitching). Not a whole lot more I need to say on them.

Trammell was one half of the best double play duo in the 80s, and with Barry Larkin making it in two years ago, I don't see how Tram shouldn't be put in. Had he won the MVP in 87 instead of getting 2nd, I think he would've had a lot more support. Just don't see how you can put one in and not the other when they are about as similar of players you will find.

Schilling was a late bloomer, not having his first full pitching season until his age 25 season and not really becoming a dominant pitcher until his 30s. However, 80 WAR puts him firmly above many of the guys already in, and he has some of those postseason moments that are apart of MLB history (if you're into that sort of thing). Don't think he'll make it in this year, but I could see him hovering around 50% after getting 38 last year.

Finally, Thomas was essentially an all bat, no glove, no speed guy, but he had a hell of a bat. Had the steroid era guys not come in early on in his career, he'd probably have many more all-star appearances and it wouldn't look as bad. Still, compared to his contemporaries, he should really be a no doubter. He's probably the one I think could have the highest variance. I could see him squeaking by this first year in the 75-80% range, or I could see him getting something like 50%. It all depends on how the voters look at his body of work compared to the first basemen already in. If they do, then he should get in.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,851
Messages
3,300,884
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top