No. If anything, they should have less top tier stars on ECW. It is obvious that the WWE is turning ECW into more of a developmental program, focusing on young guys, unproven wrestlers, to see what they can do with some additional focus. It gives them exposure on TV, without thrusting them into the main spotlight. What the WWE has done with Evan Bourne and Kofi Kingston could be seen as the fruits of that effort. As the WWE signs more wrestlers to developmental contracts, whether they get them from TNA, ROH, or their own FCW, some are simply not ready to appear on RAW or Smackdown. If ECW is used as a middleman, between the smaller promotions they come from and the big time, that is fine with me. Wrestlers like Mark Henry, Matt Hardy and Fit Finlay, who came over from the bigger shows, are always going to be needed to to give ECW a little credibility with name recognition, but, none of them were really true main eventers on either RAW or Smackdown anyway, and being on ECW beats them not having anything for Creative to have for them to do. Further, at least with Finlay, he is a known trainer. The midcard level talent the WWE should send to ECW needs to be those talents who are good at furthering the training the new wrestlers can get. ECW works as a final developmental stage as it is, but, if you add a Batista, Cena, Edge, Undertaker or something, it changes all that. While it would make ECW more legitimate as a 3rd brand in terms of the value of the belt, it would lead to the top guys hogging the spotlight, just like on RAW and Smackdown, and the younger wrestlers get pushed away more. ECW as a minor league system of sorts, where young wrestlers get their chance to shine, is a perfect role for it, one that I think is necessary. Leave the top tier stars on RAW and Smackdown.