So Bioware are releasing the "extended cut" of Mass Effect 3 this week. Apparantly this DLC adds epilogue and changes some scenes in the ending.
Here's the question that immediately came to my mind
When was this DLC designed and agreed upon?
Don't get me wrong, whether this is a new idea or an original idea it makes Bioware look bad.
Before:
If the "extended cut" was intended and designed as DLC from the off then effectively they screwed every Day 1 purchaser of the game out of the original and intended ending. Especially since the game has been out for a few months, which, in videogame time is a looong goddamn time to wait before releasing any DLC, let alone gamechaning, story changing DLC.
After:
If it were afterwards then Bioware gave in. They've pandered to the vocal minority that either didn't understand or got upset by the original ending of Mass Effect 3. I'm not judging those people, it was their opinion and they are more than entitled to express it but Bioware should not have given in. If videogames are ever to be taken seriously as art in the way that cinema and television can be videogames need to be uncompromising. If it were designed afterwards then one of the biggest and most well respected studios has played a major hand in setting games back just that little bit further.
Either way Bioware look bad in my opinion. What do you guys think? Is this DLC folly? Why? Does this DLC tarnish Bioware's reputation for you? Would you seriously consider investing in a trilogy they create again knowing that one of the above must be true?
Here's the question that immediately came to my mind
When was this DLC designed and agreed upon?
Don't get me wrong, whether this is a new idea or an original idea it makes Bioware look bad.
Before:
If the "extended cut" was intended and designed as DLC from the off then effectively they screwed every Day 1 purchaser of the game out of the original and intended ending. Especially since the game has been out for a few months, which, in videogame time is a looong goddamn time to wait before releasing any DLC, let alone gamechaning, story changing DLC.
After:
If it were afterwards then Bioware gave in. They've pandered to the vocal minority that either didn't understand or got upset by the original ending of Mass Effect 3. I'm not judging those people, it was their opinion and they are more than entitled to express it but Bioware should not have given in. If videogames are ever to be taken seriously as art in the way that cinema and television can be videogames need to be uncompromising. If it were designed afterwards then one of the biggest and most well respected studios has played a major hand in setting games back just that little bit further.
Either way Bioware look bad in my opinion. What do you guys think? Is this DLC folly? Why? Does this DLC tarnish Bioware's reputation for you? Would you seriously consider investing in a trilogy they create again knowing that one of the above must be true?