So you are telling me that Hansbrough is a better basketball player that Rose or Beasley. If you had to choice to have either Beasley, Rose or Hansbrough, you would choose Hansbrough, that would be rediculous.
Your argument about Hansbrough being on a better team, so having less opportunities doesn't make sense. Yes Beasley's team had less talent, so when Hansbrough was being guarded one on one because his team was so good that they couldn't double as often as Beasley, Beasley had two or even three guys on him. So it is more incredible that Beasley had the numbers he did. Beasley led his team past Kansas during the regular season, look at the talent difference there, it takes a great player to make up for that talent difference.
Regarding Beasley just tossing up shots, he shot 53% from the field this year, so he wasn't just throwing shots up there, he was making his shots.
When it comes to Rose, isn't your argument against Beasley that Hansbrough's team had a better record and made it farther than Beasley's?? Its basically the same argument I have for Rose, his team has a better record and made it farther than Hansbrough's team did. So if that makes Hansbrough better than Beasley, why cant it make Rose better than Hansbrough??