Like, ZOMG, the Hardy angle was so awful :(

Were you ok with the Hardy assailant angle??

  • yes, im a wrestling fan

  • No, I see bad taste in using a website that breaks real life situations blending in with crap kayfab


Results are only viewable after voting.
Don't get why people are making such a big deal still!
The article did not mention any drugs at all and any idiot can work out that it was an angle.
In todays age of technology WWE.com is just an extension of the show, everyone can go on and they can expand a storyline!
And im sure people will buy the PPV to see what happened so a smart move from WWE to make them money and get everyone talking
I think people need to stop taking themselves so seriously
 
Aside from the fact the article didn't mention drugs, since a blood tox would've been done immediately. The article said they weren't sure if he'd compete. Obviously if drugs were involved teh article would've said he's fired or won't be competing. The fact that it said not sure is a huge friggin clue that it was stunt and not real. They just used the wording to their advantage to make controversy since Vince is all about that: Limo explosion, set breaking apart, Matt Hardy/Edge feud, Katie Vic....
 
I loved the angle. While it was obviously kayfabe. WWE is still aware of the fact, that people have Internet these days. They are also aware of the fact that people STILL think wrestling is real. Eventho is obviously not. It got people talking. That was the reason behind the angle. But to think, people actually think, that all this is real. Like KB said, marks....=\ they fail. :D
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,851
Messages
3,300,884
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top