Why not? Everyone else is doing it.
Let me first say that Im not pushing one side or another with regards to religous convictions, faith, and the concept of Jesus Christ. Ive actually argued in the past the merits of religion myself on this forum. But religion is flawed. Religions often try and force people to be moral by creating rules to remove temptation or punish those who give in to it. In history, we've seen wars fought over religious rights and freedoms, haven't we?
Pascal, a 17th century French writer, phsyicist and Catholic Philosopher, said the following:
If you desire a more updated version, here's Kirk Douglas in a late 90's interview with Esquire:
Ive argued in the past that it was erroueous, man-interpreted religion from Scriptures that have been responsible for war. Flawed human being who mininterpreted God's law and words to deal with those of opposite beliefs through death. But sometimes, it's hard to argue when it came from the mouth of God, right?
Seems a little bit harsh doesn't it? But we've all been there. You're walking along, minding your own business, when a gang of cocky, young bastards start hurling abuse at you. Most of us would just keep walking, or maybe, yell some insults back or flip them the bird. But Elisha instead decides to take it ten step further. Invoking the name of God, he summons motherfriggin bears to come and maul the ignorant little bastards to death. But by Old Testament law, parents could do similar. If their children disrespected them through back-talk, parents could stone their children to death. Think about that for a second. The moral here? Kids, dont mess with God. Or bears will eat you.
I know, I know, when Jesus came, he abolished the OT law. He provided a way for salvation for all men through his death on the cross and subsequent ressurrection. And in place of the judgmental laws in the Old Testament, he instituted principals based on grace, mercy, and forgiveness. The New Testament is the perfect example for all to follow, as all the scriptures surrounding war were outdated Old Testament passages, correct?
When looking at the majority of Jesus' teachings, the emphasis is on turning the other cheek, forgiveness of those who wrong you, and prayer for redemption of those who are in sin. Look at the following passage, for example:
Jesus taught this principles in many scenarios laid out in the Gospels. But on the same note, Jesus was put to death at age 33 by the religious leaders of Jerusalem and Rome for disobeying and blaspheming against God's law. If you look at all 4 gospels, they tell a story of Jesus' triumphant entry into Jerusalem. So where did it all go wrong? Why did the same people who were laying down palms, begging for heeling, and kneeling and worshipping at Jesus' feet just a week later vote to allow a serial killer in Barrabus out of jail, and for Jesus to be executed? Sure, they feared the Saducees and Religious leaders as well as the Romans, but Jesus' true followers followed him until the end, right?
I know Ive gone long here, but Im trying to prove a point. The same Bible that argues for the sword, stoning of children, and the righteous taking things by force in the Old Testament has scriptures of peace, love, mercy and forgiveness in the New Testament. But the man who taught these principles, Jesus, was put to death for them. As for his disciples? Judas sold Jesus to the Pharisees for 30 pieces of silver. He couldn't even get gold for him, so he hung himself. Ten of the twelve were put to death as well, with only Jesus' "beloved disciple", John, dying of natural causes. 1 committed suicide, 10 were executed, and 1 lived a full life. Im no mathematician, but 1/12 doesn't seem to be good odds, do they? Some reward for following, eh?
I think Ive covered many of the complaints about Christianity. Death and war permeated the Old Testament, and the man who came to save us all was put to death, along with most of his followers. Before their deaths, his disciples wrote the New Testament. Paul, in 1 Corinthians 9:11 said this:
Another large complaint. For most of the groups covered under unrighteousness, it fits. Further, it gives the drunkard, the thieve, and the homosexual....whoops....a chance to repent and enter the Kingdom of Heaven. But why is living an "alternative lifestyle" considered to be a sin? Why is the way someone was born, the product of their hormones, unrighteous?
Finally, I look at this. There are so many people in this world that are religious. They live a "God said it, I believe it" type of lifestyle, and believe that common sense and logic defer to the word of God. They say their Amens and Hallelujah's, sing along with the merry praise band, and leave church with a smile on their face. Until they see they're blocked in by other vehicles, and their "Joy of the Lord" turns to rage. Moreso, there are times where religion tramples all semblances of logical thinking. Would you be surprised that one of the great black leaders of our time believed this?
I said at the beginning that this wasn't a religion bashing thread, and I meant it. But after all the examples Ive pointed out, surely it is, correct? Ive given examples of some awful things done in the name of God, some from his own Word. It didnt go so well for those who followed Jesus most earnestly, did it? People die in hurricanes, earthquakes, of hunger and malnutrition every did. Where is God in those situation? But...
The goal of this thread was to get the negatives out of the way. Even for those who don't believe in anything, I want you to give consideration to the following: Religion has done more good then harm to the World. After pointing out so many of the negatives of religion, it's time to give some credence and discussion to the positive aspects of faith, religion, and God.
Religion is highly flawed, of this there can be no doubt. But for every negative, there are positives to be found. What positives spring to mind when dealing with religion?
If you're of religious faith or persuasion, why so? If you're not, why?
Did the way you were raised influence your beliefs one way or the other?
Any other thoughts, discussion or debate surrounding this topic are welcome.
Let me first say that Im not pushing one side or another with regards to religous convictions, faith, and the concept of Jesus Christ. Ive actually argued in the past the merits of religion myself on this forum. But religion is flawed. Religions often try and force people to be moral by creating rules to remove temptation or punish those who give in to it. In history, we've seen wars fought over religious rights and freedoms, haven't we?
Pascal, a 17th century French writer, phsyicist and Catholic Philosopher, said the following:
Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction.
Religion has killed millions of people. Something must be wrong.
II Kings 2:23-24
23And he went up from thence unto Bethel: and as he was going up by the way, there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
24And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the LORD. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and mauled forty and two children of them.
I know, I know, when Jesus came, he abolished the OT law. He provided a way for salvation for all men through his death on the cross and subsequent ressurrection. And in place of the judgmental laws in the Old Testament, he instituted principals based on grace, mercy, and forgiveness. The New Testament is the perfect example for all to follow, as all the scriptures surrounding war were outdated Old Testament passages, correct?
"You have heard that it was said, `Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.' But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also."
"You have heard that it was said, `Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you,"
Jesus, (Matthew 5:38-39,43-44)
John 8
3And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto Jesus a woman taken in adultery. And when they had set her in the midst,
4they said unto Him, "Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act. 5Now Moses in the law commanded us that such should be stoned but what sayest thou?"
6This they said testing Him, that they might have cause to accuse Him. But Jesus stooped down and with His finger wrote on the ground, as though He heard them not.
7So when they continued asking Him, He lifted Himself up and said unto them, "He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her."
8And again He stooped down and wrote on the ground.
9And they who heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning with the eldest even unto the last, and Jesus was left alone with the woman standing in the midst.
10When Jesus had lifted Himself up and saw none but the woman, He said unto her, "Woman, where are those thine accusers? Hath no man condemned thee?"11She said, "No man, Lord." And Jesus said unto her, "Neither do I condemn thee; go, and sin no more."
Jesus taught this principles in many scenarios laid out in the Gospels. But on the same note, Jesus was put to death at age 33 by the religious leaders of Jerusalem and Rome for disobeying and blaspheming against God's law. If you look at all 4 gospels, they tell a story of Jesus' triumphant entry into Jerusalem. So where did it all go wrong? Why did the same people who were laying down palms, begging for heeling, and kneeling and worshipping at Jesus' feet just a week later vote to allow a serial killer in Barrabus out of jail, and for Jesus to be executed? Sure, they feared the Saducees and Religious leaders as well as the Romans, but Jesus' true followers followed him until the end, right?
66 And as Peter, one of the chosen twelve was beneath in the palace, there cometh one of the maids of the high priest: 67 And when she saw Peter warming himself, she looked upon him, and said, And thou also wast with Jesus of Nazareth.
68 But he denied, saying, I know not, neither understand I what thou sayest. And he went out into the porch; and the cock crew. 69 And a maid saw him again, and began to say to them that stood by, This is one of them.
70 And he denied it again. And a little after, they that stood by said again to Peter, Surely thou art one of them: for thou art a Galilaean, and thy speech agreeth thereto. 71 But he began to curse and to swear, saying, I know not this man of whom ye speak.
72 And the second time the cock crew. And Peter called to mind the word that Jesus said unto him, Before the cock crow twice, thou shalt deny me thrice. And when he thought thereon, he wept.
I know Ive gone long here, but Im trying to prove a point. The same Bible that argues for the sword, stoning of children, and the righteous taking things by force in the Old Testament has scriptures of peace, love, mercy and forgiveness in the New Testament. But the man who taught these principles, Jesus, was put to death for them. As for his disciples? Judas sold Jesus to the Pharisees for 30 pieces of silver. He couldn't even get gold for him, so he hung himself. Ten of the twelve were put to death as well, with only Jesus' "beloved disciple", John, dying of natural causes. 1 committed suicide, 10 were executed, and 1 lived a full life. Im no mathematician, but 1/12 doesn't seem to be good odds, do they? Some reward for following, eh?
I think Ive covered many of the complaints about Christianity. Death and war permeated the Old Testament, and the man who came to save us all was put to death, along with most of his followers. Before their deaths, his disciples wrote the New Testament. Paul, in 1 Corinthians 9:11 said this:
"Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, and in the Spirit of our God."
Finally, I look at this. There are so many people in this world that are religious. They live a "God said it, I believe it" type of lifestyle, and believe that common sense and logic defer to the word of God. They say their Amens and Hallelujah's, sing along with the merry praise band, and leave church with a smile on their face. Until they see they're blocked in by other vehicles, and their "Joy of the Lord" turns to rage. Moreso, there are times where religion tramples all semblances of logical thinking. Would you be surprised that one of the great black leaders of our time believed this?
Faith must trample underfoot all reason, sense, and understanding,
and whatever it sees it must put out of sight,
and wish to know nothing but the word of God.
Martin Luther King Jr.
I said at the beginning that this wasn't a religion bashing thread, and I meant it. But after all the examples Ive pointed out, surely it is, correct? Ive given examples of some awful things done in the name of God, some from his own Word. It didnt go so well for those who followed Jesus most earnestly, did it? People die in hurricanes, earthquakes, of hunger and malnutrition every did. Where is God in those situation? But...
The goal of this thread was to get the negatives out of the way. Even for those who don't believe in anything, I want you to give consideration to the following: Religion has done more good then harm to the World. After pointing out so many of the negatives of religion, it's time to give some credence and discussion to the positive aspects of faith, religion, and God.
Religion is highly flawed, of this there can be no doubt. But for every negative, there are positives to be found. What positives spring to mind when dealing with religion?
If you're of religious faith or persuasion, why so? If you're not, why?
Did the way you were raised influence your beliefs one way or the other?
Any other thoughts, discussion or debate surrounding this topic are welcome.