My$terio_Fan
I can do whatever I want
He is completely worth it. Why wouldn't they give such a creative and smart man control of the creative department? He'd definitely put on a hell of a lot better show than Jarrett.
A couple of simple reasons being... one is smart as I already said, he knows what is good for business and he knows what needs to be done. If he gets creative control of course he'll keep himself as the main player on the show, he draws money, so it's not that it owuld be selfish, but good business. He knows what draws, he'll give TNA the direction it needs.
Another reason is I don't know what some of you are readin, but he is more popular among the majority of the wrestlers than Jarrett. Reports are that there are only a few people right now who are loyal and are on Jarrett's side, the rest back Angle, they know he is good for business and they know he'll do what's best for TNA, not himself.
So yes I would say Kurt Angle is very worth it.
Huh? With all this talk about Angle being the best thing since slice bread you would think TNA was making 1.5-2.0 instead of 1.2-1.3. Yes, Angle is greaat, amazing, a wrestling god, blah blah blha.
But to give him creative control when there have been numerous reports, rumors, ect that his ego is larger than my dick? Have people not seen what happened to WCW when they gave their stars creative control?
Honestly how do we even know Angle is a "creative genius"? He's a superb wrestler, but creative genius?
So I guess personally I think Angle is worth it, unless he want's too much control. Angle is not greater than TNA imo, and if his ego get's out of line let him go back to WWE. Vince wouldn't put up with his bullshit, and HHH would burry him anyways.