KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 1159 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

ShinChan™;5616379 said:
The stable was a star. Why hasn't any individual out of those 3 become a star yet even after couple of years of split?

None of them are as great on their own.

What do you think of Sanity? Do they have the legs to go far in NXT?

They're good enough but I don't know if they have the talent to make it work. Nikki Cross is the most interesting of the four.
 
They're good enough but I don't know if they have the talent to make it work. Nikki Cross is the most interesting of the four.

I dont see it. I watch her and she feels forced/robotic. Is it her performance before she got to NXT that makes the most interesting or am I missing something? And if so what is it?

And because I cant sleep I spend time thinking about pointless shit, we've now had two dusty classics and both winners are teams that Dusty Rhodes had nothing to do with in terms of development (sure they could have been inspired by him but its not really the same) couldnt they have had the winners (particularly the first winners last year) be someone Dusty actually help mould into the wrestler they are/were? I do understand that they used it to launch Joe's heel turn.
 
Partially because the division is in need of talent and somenoe like Cross could give Asuka a challenge.

Maybe the first one but not so much now. A lot of Dusty's kids are already on the main roster.
 
The Undertaker, Goldberg, Brock Lesnar, Triple H and John Cena are the biggest stars in WWE at present. None of WWE's booking of any of the full-time guys on the roster puts them anywhere close to being as relevant as those mentioned above.
So why are fans in general surprised that None of the full-timers can catch on with a wider audience when they are mere chumps in comparison to even an AE non-wrestler Shane O'Mac?


The SHIELD looked like possible stars because they were treated as such against all who went against them, whilst Daniel Bryan was a different case altogether what with how the fans got behind him.
Can't say the same on either aspect for the present crop.
 
Has Strowman faced Big Show before? If not, I feel like that's a no-brainer along the way of establishing him as a monster. Even if they have before, it would've had to have been in a multi-man match, as I don't think Show's been around, except yesterday, since Strowman came to Raw.
 
Just think it's an obvious starter feud. Squashing jobbers and then another giant comes out to challenge him. What good does destroying Zayn do? Nothing, really.
 
Both. He's the first person to pin Reigns in a singles match and....well just think about the Orton feud from 2014. Not for too long of course as it might make you lose your mind.
 
Kane or Henry could also work. But With Big Show gone for such a long time recently, it would appear to be a bigger deal to beat him. Plus Kane and Henry job to everyone.
 
True. Those three have places on the roster but I'd be fine with Strowman jumping past one of those three and getting on to something more important.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top