KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 1046 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

WWE generally does a 2/3 PPV per feud type of booking. However, do you think they overdo it with that formula quite a bit? Clearly there are times when a Single PPV is clearly enough for 2 guys but WWE drags it out for some strange reason and causes the general fanbase to lose interest in the feud altogether and make the fans practically sick of seeing them paired together. After all, shouldn't it be done in a way that fans are left wanting more?


I see people complain about the 50/50 booking most of the roster gets and how a certain superstar doesn't get chance to build momentum, but when someone is booked strongly, the same people complain. Any idea why that is?
 
Following on from my last question:

Ideally, you would think the Wyatt family would be headed for a Survivor Series match, perhaps with Rowan returning to join them and maybe someone else, say a newly turned heel Roman Reigns even.
However, with regards to the upcoming HiaC match between Reigns and Bray Wyatt, surely after the drawn match on RAW, the Cell match has to be the end of their Singles feud at least, right?
Tho, I really can see them facing off at TLC yet again, you know, because WWE won't get the hint that sometimes a decisive winner isn't required(see Ambrose vs Rollins pt.1, which is a feud they really butchered at the second go, lMO).




Also on the 2/3 feud subject, are there any recent feuds you were really looking forward to that WWE have completely destroyed your enthusiasm to the point you would never like to see the 2 guys in the ring together again?
 
There's no reason for the feud to continue after the Cell.

I can't picture it going to TLC. It's just too far away.

Rollins vs. Ambrose. They fought so many times and there's nothing left to see from them.
 
I'm sure you've noticed Cena doesn't have a match yet for HIAC. Do you think he does an open challenge at the PPV and loses it then? Or maybe gets injured and has to relinquish it? It would be a good way to debut someone from NXT.

I'm certainly not one of those posters who predicts a debut every time Cena comes out for a challenge, but if they're going to write him off TV, what better way to give a newcomer a good rub?
 
I think it's Cena as they'll try to set up the 16th title win at Wrestlemania. We'll ignore how much better it would be to have title win #17 there of course.
 
Recently been arguing with another poster over the more likely opponent for Taker at Mania.

Think Sting or Cena is the safer bet?

How would you book a Cena/Taker Mania feud?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top