KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 750 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

Merchandise, TV fees, mainstream appeal. An article came out a few weeks back saying sponsorships are something like 5x what they were five years ago.

It's a hard to grasp concept, but the idea of WWE is booming while WWE itself is kind of meandering along.
 
Than when? 2008? Absolutely. WWE is so diversified now that they can handle almost any hit they take. The product isn't aimed at people my age anymore and there's a large group of fans that are going to grow up watching it like I did. That's a good sign.
 
Than when? 2008? Absolutely. WWE is so diversified now that they can handle almost any hit they take. The product isn't aimed at people my age anymore and there's a large group of fans that are going to grow up watching it like I did. That's a good sign.

Attitude Era. Overall. Also, they have Punk, Bryan, The Wyatts, The Shield, and so many more which I would say the older generation would rather enjoy.
 
What's the probability of Orton snagging the World title and Cena grabbing the WWE title at the same time and keeping this unification angle going?
 
Attitude Era. Overall. Also, they have Punk, Bryan, The Wyatts, The Shield, and so many more which I would say the older generation would rather enjoy.

The Attitude Era was a niche audience and wasn't going to last long term. WWE knew that.

Yeah they do, but the majority is built for younger audiences, which is smart.

What's the probability of Orton snagging the World title and Cena grabbing the WWE title at the same time and keeping this unification angle going?

RAther high.

was unified with IC title in 2002.

Yeah that.
 
Bear "The Hitman" Hug;4684437 said:
Who's in charge of Jimi Hendrix and Bob Dylan's royalties and why are they not sueing the WWE for CJ Parker's theme music?

Jimi's stepsister Janie Hendrix. Don't know about Dylan but he's still alive so maybe him.
 
WWE 2001/2002: No WCW or ECW Championships, massive roster of developmental talents, veterans, ex-WCW/ECW wrestlers, and a shift in programming. Do you keep the European, Hardcore & Light Heavyweight titles, or replace them with another undercard championship. If so, what is that title called?
 
So in some sense, is the WWE in its best position?

From a business standpoint, yes.

WWE 2001/2002: No WCW or ECW Championships, massive roster of developmental talents, veterans, ex-WCW/ECW wrestlers, and a shift in programming. Do you keep the European, Hardcore & Light Heavyweight titles, or replace them with another undercard championship. If so, what is that title called?

Light Heavyweight no. The Cruiserweight Title was fine. European no as it should have been the US Title.
 
Not until about 1991. The WWF was pretty bad in the late 80s from a wrestling perspective. Once WCW hit the 90s though, it got horrible in a hurry. Sting vs. the Dangerous Alliance brought them back to the top in 92 but after that it was more along the lines of who sucked less until about 1996.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top