Isn't their argument that the WHC has the lineage of the WCW title, which itself (claimed it) had the lineage of the NWA title?
Also, since when has anybody expected wrestling promotions, especially WWE to be honest?
They can REALLY stretch and make a case for having the same lineage as the WCW Title (started in 1991) but the NWA Title is a completely separate entity.
No one, but it's annoying for those of us that know the way it actually works.
Bruno stayed in one territory while Andre never stayed long. The fans would come and see Andre when he was on tour because they didn't get to all that often. Bruno sold out MSG all the time, but it was to the same fans over and over which limited the amount of people he could reach. Andre had the entire country to draw. Two very different things.
Can you explain to me where Ryback is dangerous in the ring? Besides hurting Punk in a table spot a few weeks ago, he uses the same style power moves of many guys his size. I know it has more to do with execution, I'm just not sure where it's happening.
What you have to remember is wrestling moves are almost always done in tandem. It's both guys working together to try make the move seem realistic but also safe. If one guy does a move before the other is ready or without letting him know if something strange is coming (calling a spot), it could go badly.
Also there's the simple idea of being good at the moves. There's a technique to how to do any given move and Ryback simply isn't that good at them. Take a powerbomb for instance. You're supposed to lift someone up in the air and have them land as flat on their back as possible (the more of their body that hits the mat at the same time, the less the move actually hurts), but if Ryback pushes down on one side harder than the other, the guy taking the move is going to land at an angle, which can hurt their shoulder, back etc.
A specific example might be the Meat Hook. That's supposed to hit the neck/chest, but if Ryback goes too high with it then it could snap their head back or damage their face.
Could the Survivor Series benefit from a return to not only featuring a traditional main event match, but one in which something of substance is on the line as it was back in 2001 and 2004?
The on the line part is what's missing. When it's just for honor/bragging rights, there isn't much of a reason to watch. It can work (1987) but it's so rarely done.