KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 350 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

How would you feel about CM Punk attacking Lesnar to gain respect, leading to a match?

I guess this leads off my earlier question, but surely it would be smart to use some of the big stars available to boost the full-time roster too.

Do you think the match would draw well??
 
How would you feel about CM Punk attacking Lesnar to gain respect, leading to a match?

I guess this leads off my earlier question, but surely it would be smart to use some of the big stars available to boost the full-time roster too.

Do you think the match would draw well??

No. Punk having any kind of a chance against lesnar would be looked at as a joke.
 
Assuming Brock vs Undertaker happens at Mania...would doing Brock vs Kane at the Chamber or Royal Rumble be worth burning an appearance as an undercard filler match?
 
When was the last time the WWE Title or World Heavyweight title changed hands on Raw or Smackdown, that wasn't a MITB cash in or someone relinquishing the title and it being won in a subsequent battle royal?

Managed to ask this in the right place this time
 
No. Punk having any kind of a chance against lesnar would be looked at as a joke.

To me, that feels like a pretty big problem. This is exactly the point I was trying to make earlier. He's supposed to be the best wrestler there, he's the champ. I agree, us smarty-pants and the smarks/IWC or whatever might think "impossible" or whatever, but the common fan should hardly see it that way too?

He's beaten bigger guys like Show and Henry, along with Cena and Kane (who has beaten brock, lets not forget.) and more technical wrestlers like Bryan and Jericho And had a rumble or two with Triple H and the Undetaker. He shouldnt be seen as being less than atleast a challenge to brock.

If hes top of the food chain, he's beaten Cena, he brings in money. I cant buy that it wouldnt be both financially sound and believable to have those two face off. (excluding that it would be heel vs heel right now).

I get that a loss would very much so tarnish Brocks impact, and that he's only here to wrestle people with visible muscles. And i know youre right, its part of the reason we ask you questions in the first place. I havent even watched RAW in two months and i'm seemingly buying into punks current angle. Apologies for clogging up your thread, spam be damned.
 
To me, that feels like a pretty big problem. This is exactly the point I was trying to make earlier. He's supposed to be the best wrestler there, he's the champ. I agree, us smarty-pants and the smarks/IWC or whatever might think "impossible" or whatever, but the common fan should hardly see it that way too?

He's beaten bigger guys like Show and Henry, along with Cena and Kane (who has beaten brock, lets not forget.) and more technical wrestlers like Bryan and Jericho And had a rumble or two with Triple H and the Undetaker. He shouldnt be seen as being less than atleast a challenge to brock.

If hes top of the food chain, he's beaten Cena, he brings in money. I cant buy that it wouldnt be both financially sound and believable to have those two face off. (excluding that it would be heel vs heel right now).

I get that a loss would very much so tarnish Brocks impact, and that he's only here to wrestle people with visible muscles. And i know youre right, its part of the reason we ask you questions in the first place. I havent even watched RAW in two months and i'm seemingly buying into punks current angle. Apologies for clogging up your thread, spam be damned.

And at the end of the day, no one is going to buy Punk's offense as having a chance against Lesnar. That's where he loses it.
 
Do you think CM Punk bladed during Raw? if so; what's going to be the consequence since that's no longer allowed?

Would Rock vs Taker ever work as a Mania match?

I mean, obviously Rock is "credible" enough to have a shot at beating the streak, but Rock's best ability is talking and working the buildup between them given Taker's limited appearances would be tough
 
Who was to blame, Ryback or Swaggs for that botch on Raw?

I think Swagger but it's almost always hard to know for sure.

Now that you mention that, didn't Mysterio and Evan Bourns start wrestling quite young? Do you think that it is in any way related (All three have had drug issues)?

Rey was like 14. Not sure on Bourne.

Do you think they should have a one night stand for the Attitude era?

I'm not sure what they could have from it. Not many people would buy it though.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top