KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 331 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

Do you think the 1000th raw will end with something as big and shocking for a big summer angle like punks shoot promo last year and nexus 2 years ago? And if so then what would be your guess as to what it might be?
 
What are your thoughts about the Open Fight Night and the Gut Check segments TNA are running now. Hell, what are your basic thoughts about the programming in general?
 
I'm not a fan of either.

Open Fight Night serves no purpose. Those matches could all easily be done on any given show. We didn't need to have these people call each other out when they have to face each other anyway in the next six or seven weeks in the BFG Series. Also having it once a month is overdoing it because people remember that it means nothing.

Gut Check is equally as badly thought out. First of all, there should be a guaranteed method of getting a contract, like through a win. Second, mix it up a bit. There's no point in seeing people get beaten every week. Third, have the judging that night. Fourth, I hate reality stuff so it's not for me in the first place.

I like TNA but they've cooled down a bit in the last two or three weeks.
 
Apologies for this mini rant, but why does the IWC want to see young stars go head to head with the veterans so often? I mean what sounds more appealing Triple H vs Brock Lesnar or Brock Lesnar vs Cody Rhodes or Ziggler something like that? Why can't they realize that none of the younger lower card guys are good enough for a big match like that? The WWE is all about the money since day one and guys like Ziggler, Rhodes, Ryder, Sandow etc. are not going to draw money at least not in the foreseeable future (i'd be shocked if ever).

But the ONE question I would like to ask is do you agree that WWE is right in having the veterans face off against each other rather than a lower card undrawable nobody in the hopes it might get them over magically?
 
Mathix said:
Apologies for this mini rant, but why does the IWC want to see young stars go head to head with the veterans so often? I mean what sounds more appealing Triple H vs Brock Lesnar or Brock Lesnar vs Cody Rhodes or Ziggler something like that? Why can't they realize that none of the younger lower card guys are good enough for a big match like that? The WWE is all about the money since day one and guys like Ziggler, Rhodes, Ryder, Sandow etc. are not going to draw money at least not in the foreseeable future (i'd be shocked if ever).

But the ONE question I would like to ask is do you agree that WWE is right in having the veterans face off against each other rather than a lower card undrawable nobody in the hopes it might get them over magically?
Click to expand...

Yes. The veterans have credibility. Guys like Cody and Dolph have nothing on HHH or Cena and no one would buy them as a threat to Brock.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Coco Answers Wrestling Questions
5 6 7
Replies
167
Views
20K
Mr. Artistic guy
M
J
J4L Answers Questions
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Johnny Scumm
J
P
PWF Answers Wrestling Questions
18 19 20
Replies
487
Views
48K
nightmare
N
I
LARIAT'S WORLD
Replies
2
Views
3K
It's...Baylariat!
I
J
Thrash Answers Music Questions!
2 3
Replies
64
Views
6K
El Rev sXe
E

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 0 (members: 0, guests: 0)

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 1,312 (members: 0, guests: 1,312)

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego

Share this page

Back
Top