KB, I'd like to know what you think of the "addition by subtraction" situation in which WWE (apparently) hires a talent away from TNA in order to weaken the smaller company, even though they don't really need them on their roster.
Specifically, I'm asking about Gail Kim. I believe she was an integral part of TNA's women's division, right? I can understand WWE hiring her to get her away from the other guys, but when they did, do you think they told her they had no real in-ring plans for her? Do you think she chose a higher salary over greater TV exposure? I'm not saying I'd blame her if she did, given that she was in her mid-30's when she switched companies and needed to think about putting away money for her eventual retirement.
Or, do you think WWE lured her, not only with bigger bucks, but with the promise she would be a featured performer?........in effect, lying to her?
Lastly, if WWE did the former, do you think it's worth it simply to weaken TNA? Is it money well spent?