KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 120 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

That people are jumping the gun WAY too far here as there's no telling what could come of this. The crowd ate that up last night. This is a good sign for the Miz. He's no longer a guy that is using others to get pulled up. He's now pulling someone else up. That's a big step.
 
In terms of showing as much of TNA's roster in matches and angles as possible, which is better: A pair of shows 2 hour & 1 hour or a single 3-hour show?

Opinions on Triple H's run on Raw from 2002 to 2005?

And your thoughts on niche championships like the X-Division, Hardcore, etc...
 
I always thought for his size Goldberg was probably stronger. Lesnar > Goldberg in height and muscle mass. That a guy of Goldberg's physique, which was big don't get me wrong but relatively small compared to a lot of guys like Zeke for example, and for him to to Jackhammer The Giant, which is a difficult lift in itself, was astounding. Lesnar was probably stronger in actuality. Anyway, that's just my 2 cents.

My question is why do you not think they went the route of Beth and Kharma. Is it because they don't view Beth as appropriate competition or that they just wanted to do an original storyline with Kharma?
 
In terms of showing as much of TNA's roster in matches and angles as possible, which is better: A pair of shows 2 hour & 1 hour or a single 3-hour show?

Opinions on Triple H's run on Raw from 2002 to 2005?

And your thoughts on niche championships like the X-Division, Hardcore, etc...

2 and 1, definitely. If it's used right that is.

Pretty awful since he wouldn't fight anyone but big power guys and Shawn and the feuds were very boring.

Divas. They have boobs.

I always thought for his size Goldberg was probably stronger. Lesnar > Goldberg in height and muscle mass. That a guy of Goldberg's physique, which was big don't get me wrong but relatively small compared to a lot of guys like Zeke for example, and for him to to Jackhammer The Giant, which is a difficult lift in itself, was astounding. Lesnar was probably stronger in actuality. Anyway, that's just my 2 cents.

My question is why do you not think they went the route of Beth and Kharma. Is it because they don't view Beth as appropriate competition or that they just wanted to do an original storyline with Kharma?

Physique means next to nothing. There's a scene in ne of the Conan movies where Wilt Chamberlain lifts something with ease and has no physique for the most part. Also, some of the stuff Lesnar does is just freaking terrifying. Goldberg Jackhammered him, Lesnar threw him around all over the place. F5, belly to belly, superplex etc.

No idea. That story last night was something interesting. Definitely not a slight on Beth though.
 
Should WWE have another Old School edition of Raw this year after the success that was last year's?

What about an Old School edition of SmackDown!?
 
In a situation where WCW lived on and the WWF was one roster, how do you think John Cena, Randy Orton, Dave Batista, Shelton Benjamin & Brock Lesnar would have done, what with a stronger upper-card of veterans still holding down the fort?
 
Is John Cena just being in an "I Quit" match at a PPV just basically telling everyone come watch Cena get his ass kicked then come back in a few minutes to win?
 
You've reviewed a lot of ECW stuff. What's your opinion on the Unholy Alliance (Taijiri/Mikey Whipwreck), and the team of Roadkill and Danny Doring?
 
How many people have you seen wreck their bodies in places like XPW or CZW?

Now how many of them have New York Times best selling books and three WWF Titles including a spot in the main event of Wrestlemania?

That should answer your question.
 
What was your thoughts on the APA's one night return in 2007/8?

What was the single worst match finish in your opinion?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top