KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 55 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

As for a wrestler he's fine. Everyone wants big and flashy moves but at the end of the day he's beaten just about everyone he's fought so why should he be considered bad?

As for WWE Champion, he's perfect. He's the kind of guy that people will pay to see get beaten up. It works every time and it should work here.
 
As for a wrestler he's fine. Everyone wants big and flashy moves but at the end of the day he's beaten just about everyone he's fought so why should he be considered bad?

As for WWE Champion, he's perfect. He's the kind of guy that people will pay to see get beaten up. It works every time and it should work here.

I couldn't agree more, and im sure yuo've witnessed the Miz arguments in the RAW LD? In my opinion, i think most people like The Miz whether your a mark or not, he's greatly improved over time with his in ring work, he has alot of charisma which is great, his mic work is top notch.

And he deserved the WWE title not only for his hard work but for his improvement.
 
The reason I don't get into those is you can beat on people until the end of time and they'll never admit they're wrong which is a waste of time.
 
So true, and also i think Miz epitomize's now, that if you've been told you can't achieve your dreams that you prove them wrong. That attitude is very good, and im someone who respects The Miz for coming through the way he has to become top dog on RAW but in WWE.
 
Jackson will need a feud soon enough but needs to be heel I think.

Morrison will likely get a match with Miz at Rumble if he's still got the belt.
 
Miz should still have the belt by Royal Rumble, him and JoMo would be good, oh and KB, im repping you for your positive comment on The Miz.
 
Speaking of the rumble, who will be this year's surprise?

I'm assuming Trips won't return until then and costs Sheamus the rumble. Then someone else wins it. Could be wrong.
 
Should HHH vs Sheamus happen at Wrestlemania or before then?

Given the current roster of relitavely inexperienced Main Eventers (Miz, Sheamus, Wade, Alberto and even Kane, not inexperianced but new to the ME scene) and limited experienced main eventers (Cena, Orton, Hunter, Taker and Edge are all that come to mind) can WWE put on a Wrestlemania that people will buy and is worthy of being called a Wrestlemania?
 
It should happen before then.

Given the Rumble, I'm really not sure. Too early to say.

Sure WWE can put on a good Mania. Batista popped in at Elimination Chamber and fir in with Cena perfectly. It just has to be built up right.
 
Definitely.

That's what people i think don't understand is its been a week since he won the title, the match with Lawler was a gift for King, a test for Miz (whether he was shown as a weak champion or not) and for the fan's it was a gift and surprise. To judge probably the best guy in WWE at the moment after 1 title defense is not right, i for one as a soon to be wrestler, Miz's speech about achieving dreams, is something all people should take into mind when wanting to reach a goal.

You improve, you become more confident, come across as charismatic and have good work ethic you can reach your dream, the Miz has done that, and look where he is now.
 
Some people think he is, i can personally see and im sure other's can too, that Miz will really step it up, and down the line will have more WWE Title reigns. As a soon to be wrestler in training someone like The Miz and even John Cena are people i could look up to in terms of work ethic and all those things. It shows anything is possible.
 
Nah. I think people put too much emphasis on this guy looks weak or that guy looks weak. Miz's character has been built up as a guy that is rarely the best wrestler in a match but he finds a way to win. Being successful in a gimmick match where he's vulnerable to something like he was hurt with isn't looking weak.
 
I do think Miz is good in the ring, he has improved greatly with his in ring work, doing new things each time, but he was put in a match that he'd never competed in before, he used the environment to his advantage and came out the winner.
 
Nah. I think people put too much emphasis on this guy looks weak or that guy looks weak. Miz's character has been built up as a guy that is rarely the best wrestler in a match but he finds a way to win. Being successful in a gimmick match where he's vulnerable to something like he was hurt with isn't looking weak.
Thank you. Jesus, I spent 100 posts on that shit in the LD. People didn't get that how the whole match played out kept Miz from looking weak. All it was was 1 fall through the table to give King the shot to win. They just want Miz to be 100% of the offense in every match he's in, which makes no sense. He was about 85% of the offense.

Sadly, that LD flame-fest has been keeping me up all night. Now that I know there are people who agree with me that know what they're talking about I might be able to go to sleep.

One more question. Sheamus the right choice over JoMo for King of the Ring?
 
Exactly. It works fine but people don't like him so it sucks.

Alot of wrestling fans tend to be the one's who suck when they don't realise when a certain wrestler is actually good. But i will always side with the people who share the same opinions on certain things to do with wrestling, whether its got to do with The Miz, John Cena, booking, matches or TNA hate.
 
The majority IWC is stupid and just like to complain.

I don't understand how so many people can stand united and not know what they are talking about, while only a few people make sense and barely can be heard.

Whatever the IWC says, think the opposite because that's more likely to make sense and be logical.
 
Because whether people want to admit it or not, 90%+ of the IWC are people that will repeat whatever is said. Since Meltzer is the biggest name in the IWC and bashes VInce every single chance he gets, they bash Vince and go with whatever theories Meltzer has, most of which make little sense.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top