KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 45 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

In 2006/2007, WWE was pushing Gregory Helm relatively hard, do you think he could have captured a midcard belt or possibly even gone onto eventually win a World Title?
 
I had never heard of Kaval until NXT. As for where he gets pushed, why not push him into a feud with Ziggler? He just finished a feud, but, no, MVP gets the title shot.

Also, I've got some time to waste tonight. Any matches that you recommend?
 
He has a guaranteed title shot. Lord knows when he gets it. I just feel like WWE really screwed up Kaval after NXT Season 2 was over. Only one win to get into Team SD!, and he loses his spot to TYLER FUCKING REKS.
 
He has a guaranteed title shot. Lord knows when he gets it. I just feel like WWE really screwed up Kaval after NXT Season 2 was over. Only one win to get into Team SD!, and he loses his spot to TYLER FUCKING REKS.

Patience Noah. SmackDown is the quality show and has been for at least the last year and a half.

KB, IC wrote an article for the main page about the Rockers' break-up and all subsequent team break-ups since. Is it really necessary for it to happen every time?
 
He has a guaranteed title shot. Lord knows when he gets it. I just feel like WWE really screwed up Kaval after NXT Season 2 was over. Only one win to get into Team SD!, and he loses his spot to TYLER FUCKING REKS.

Well maybe if he expanded his moveset past kick I, kick II and kick IV he'd be pushed a bit better.

Patience Noah. SmackDown is the quality show and has been for at least the last year and a half.

KB, IC wrote an article for the main page about the Rockers' break-up and all subsequent team break-ups since. Is it really necessary for it to happen every time?

No. Shawn and Marty were a rare instance where one was a legit superstar and the other was just pretty good. The Harts were the same but you didn't need a breakup like that for them obviously. Nowadays the tag division is dead anyway because it's two wrestlers that happen to wrestle together rather than, as the Harts used to put it, "Two Harts Beating As One". They're designed to be broken up and no one takes them seriously because of it.
 
With WWE releasing their (controversial) list of the top 50 superstars of all time, who would you rank as the top five of all time and why? Not necessarily your five favorites but the five superstars who were the best and most important to wrestling.
 
1. Hogan. No explanation needed.
2. Austin. The ONLY guy that can give a legit argument to being a bigger star in WWE (not in wrestling as that's not even close).
3. Rock. Big drop off to get to him though as he simply isn't on their level, despite what a lot of people will tell you.
4. Cena. He's been the guy for five years now which is longer than a lot of guys get on top.
5. Sammartino. Selling out MSG that many times cannot be overlooked. This one could be interchangeable with a few others.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top